scholarly journals HE USE OF SOME ORGANIC AND BIO-FERTILIZERS FOR EARLIGRANDE PEACH TREES FERTILIZATION UNDER NORTH SINAI CONDITIONS b: Fruiting and fruit quality

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-130
Author(s):  
Abdaallah El-Kharafen ◽  
Hany El-Alakmy ◽  
Roqia Ahmed ◽  
Mohamed Sourour ◽  
Mohamed ElDeep
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-114
Author(s):  
Abdaallah El-Kharafen ◽  
Hany El-Alakmy ◽  
Roqia Ahmed ◽  
Mohamed Sourour ◽  
Mohamed ElDeep

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (4Supl1) ◽  
pp. 2815
Author(s):  
André Luiz Kulkamp de Souza ◽  
Márcia Wulff Schuch ◽  
Samila Silva Camargo ◽  
Robson Rodrigues Pereira ◽  
Edson Luiz de Souza ◽  
...  

Worldwide, peach propagation has been performed mainly by grafting scions of desirable cultivars on rootstocks obtained from seeds. There are, however, other potential propagation methods not widely adopted due to the limited reports on the field performance of the resultant trees. This study addressed this knowledge gap and investigated the field performance of peach trees of the cultivar Maciel that were established in an orchard (5.0 m × 1.4 m spacing) in 2011. The trees were trained in a "Y" system, with seedlings from three propagation techniques: 1) Conventional System (CS) - vegetative bud grafting of the scion on the rootstock of the Okinawa cultivar obtained from seed; 2) Rootstock by Minicutting (RM) - vegetative bud grafting of the scion on the rootstock of the Okinawa cultivar obtained by minicutting in a semi-hydroponic system; 3) Self-Rooting (SR) - self-rooting of the scion in a semi-hydroponic system. The vegetative, productive, and fruit quality parameters were assessed during 2012 and 2013. The Maciel peach trees that were propagated by the SR technique were found to have similar or even superior field performance to those propagated by the CS. The RM propagation method was also found to be an important potential alternative to peach propagation, since this it combines two techniques (cutting and grafting) to reduce tree vigor, especially if the goal is high-density planting.


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (39) ◽  
pp. 2933-2939
Author(s):  
Farias Barreto Caroline ◽  
Batalha Moreno Kirinus Marines ◽  
Santos da Silva Pricila ◽  
Braga Andrade Suelen ◽  
Valmor Rombaldi Cesar ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shao‐Hua Li ◽  
Xue‐Ping Zhang ◽  
Zhao‐Qing Meng ◽  
Guo‐Jie Liu
Keyword(s):  

HortScience ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 815A-815
Author(s):  
Stephen Miller* ◽  
Ralph Scorza

Peach trees with a pillar (P) (columnar) or upright (UP) growth habit were planted at four in-row spacings (1.5, 2.0, 4.0, and 6.0 m) in 1999 and trained to a central leader or multiple leader system to evaluate their performance in an orchard environment. A standard (S) form peach cultivar (`Harrow Beauty') was included for comparison. In this replicated study using a split-split-split plot design, one-half of the trees were summer pruned (SP) 6 weeks before harvest in each growing season from 2001 to 2003. Growth habit, tree spacing, and SP had a significant effect on tree growth and time necessary for dormant pruning. Growth habit and spacing also affected time required to summer prune. Total pruning time for all growth habits was significantly greater for SP trees compared to non-SP trees. Cumulative yields per tree were greater for UP and S habit trees than P trees over the first four seasons. Per tree yields increased as the in-row spacing increased but were decreased slightly by SP. UP trees consistently produced larger size fruit than P or S trees. Potential yields per ha and pruning times based on projected best tree spacings will be presented. UP form trees provide a good transition for growers going from low-density to high-density peach systems, with significant advantages in yield and fruit quality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document