scholarly journals IRRIGATION SCHEDULING ASSESSMENT FOR SNAP BEAN AND SQUASH UNDER DRIP IRRIGATION CONDITIONS IN NORTH NILE DELTA.

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 4999-5008
Author(s):  
G. Labeeb ◽  
M.A.M. Ibrahim ◽  
A.A. Abdel-khalek
Keyword(s):  
Drip Irrigation ◽  
Nile Delta ◽  
Irrigation Scheduling ◽  
Snap Bean

scholarly journals Response of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) to fertigation by irrigation scheduling in drip irrigation system

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 1170-1175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ankush Ankush ◽  
Vikram Singh ◽  
S. K. Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Nutrient Uptake ◽  
Solanum Lycopersicum ◽  
Drip Irrigation ◽  
Maximum Yield ◽  
Foliar Spray ◽  
Irrigation Scheduling ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Treatment Combination ◽  
Urea Phosphate ◽  
Solanum Lycopersicum L

Drip irrigation technique has proved its superiority over other methods of irrigation due to direct application of water and nutrient in the vicinity of root zone. A field study was conducted to evaluate the effect of irrigation and fertigation scheduling through drip irrigation in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) during Rabi season of 2015-16 at Rajasthan College of Agriculture, MPUAT, Udaipur. There were three irrigation levels and five fertilization levels in split-plot design with three replications. Nutrient content in plant and fruit was found higher under the application of drip irrigation at 100 % PE (I1) and at 100 % RDF through fertigation (F1). Maximum nutrient uptake by tomato i.e. nitrogen (166.83 kg ha-1), phosphorus (41.59 kg ha-1) and potassium (183.08 kg ha-1) was recorded with treatment combination of drip irrigation at 75 % PE (I2) + 75 % RDF through fertigation + 2 foliar spray of 1 % urea phosphate (F3). Similarly, significantly maximum yield and growth attributes i.e. fruit yield (201.25 q ha-1), plant height (67.43 cm) and number of branches (12.33) were registered with treatment combination of drip irrigation at 75 % PE and 75 % RDF through fertigation + 2 foliar spray of 1 % urea phosphate. Drip fertigation method has proved to be very significant in improving nutrient uptake which finally resulting in enhancement of growth and yield of tomato crop.

scholarly journals Potential and Actual Water Savings through Improved Irrigation Scheduling in Small-Scale Vegetable Production

Agronomy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Studer ◽  
Simon Spoehel
Keyword(s):  
Water Use ◽  
Irrigation Water ◽  
Drip Irrigation ◽  
Water Productivity ◽  
Irrigation Scheduling ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Vegetable Production ◽  
Usual Practice ◽  
Irrigation Water Use ◽  
Small Scale Farmers

Appropriate irrigation scheduling for efficient water use is often a challenge for small-scale farmers using drip irrigation. In a trial with 12 farmers in Sébaco, Nicaragua, two tools to facilitate irrigation scheduling were tested: the Water Chart (a table indicating required irrigation doses) and tensiometers. The study aimed at evaluating if and to what extent simple tools can reduce irrigation water use and improve water productivity in drip-irrigated vegetable (beetroot; Beta vulgaris L.) production compared with the farmers’ usual practice. Irrigation water use was substantially reduced (around 20%) when farmers irrigated according to the tools. However, farmers did not fully adhere to the tool guidance, probably because they feared that their crop would not get sufficient water. Thus they still over-irrigated their crop: between 38% and 88% more water than recommended was used during the treatment period, resulting in 91% to 139% higher water use than required over the entire growing cycle. Water productivity of beetroot production was, therefore, much lower (around 3 kg/m3) than what can be achieved under comparable conditions, although yields were decent. Differences in crop yield and water productivity among treatments were not significant. The simplified Water Chart was not sufficiently understandable to farmers (and technicians), whereas tensiometers were better perceived, although they do not provide any indication on how much water to apply. We conclude that innovations such as drip irrigation or improved irrigation scheduling have to be appropriately introduced, e.g., by taking sufficient time to co-produce a common understanding about the technologies and their possible usefulness, and by ensuring adequate follow-up support.

scholarly journals Evapotranspiration data to determine agro-climatic zones in Egypt

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samiha A. H. Ouda ◽  
Tahany A. Norledin
Keyword(s):  
Nile Delta ◽  
Reference Evapotranspiration ◽  
Irrigation Scheduling ◽  
Weather Data ◽  
Climatic Zones ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Scheduling Model ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Difference Test ◽  
Climatic Zoning

Abstract The objective of this paper was to compare between agro-climatic zones developed from 10-year interval of weather data from 2005-2014, 20-year interval of weather data from 1995-2014 and the zoning developed by [NORELDIN et al. 2016] using 30-year interval from 1985-2014 in the old cultivated land of Egypt in the Nile Delta and Valley. Monthly means of weather data were calculated for each year, and then monthly values for 10-year and 20-years were calculated for each governorate. Basic Irrigation scheduling model (BISm) was used to calculate reference evapotranspiration (ETo). Analysis of variance was used and the means was separated and ranked using least significant difference test (LSD0.05). Our results showed that agro-climatic zoning using 20-year values of ETo was similar to the zones developed with 30-year values of ETo, with different values of average ETo in each zone. Furthermore, using 10-year values of ETo resulted in higher values of ETo in each zone, compared to 20-year and 30-year ETo values. However, the average value of ETo over the three classifications was close to each other. Thus, depending on the availability of weather data, either zoning can be sufficient to develop agro-climatic zones.

Irrigation scheduling of maize based on plant and soil indices with surface drip irrigation subjected to different irrigation regimes

2019 ◽  
Vol 224 ◽  
pp. 105740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afshin Khorsand ◽  
Vahid Rezaverdinejad ◽  
Hossein Asgarzadeh ◽  
Abolfazl Majnooni-Heris ◽  
Amir Rahimi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drip Irrigation ◽  
Irrigation Scheduling ◽  
Irrigation Regimes ◽  
Soil Indices ◽  
Surface Drip Irrigation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document