scholarly journals PERFORMANCE OF SOME GENOTYPES OF COTTON UNDER CONVENTIONAL AND LATE PLANTING DATES

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 336-352
Keyword(s):  
Planting Dates ◽  
Late Planting

scholarly journals Impact of Row Spacing and Planting Date on the Canopy Environment, Abundance of Lesser Cornstalk Borer and Other Arthropods, and Incidence of Aflatoxigenic Fungi in Peanuts

1997 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-59
Author(s):  
S. D. Stewart ◽  
K. L. Boweri ◽  
T. P. Mack ◽  
J. H. Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Climatic Conditions ◽  
Planting Date ◽  
Row Spacing ◽  
Planting Dates ◽  
Canopy Development ◽  
Late Planting ◽  
Elasmopalpus Lignosellus ◽  
Soil Temperatures ◽  
Lepidoptera Pyralidae ◽  
Wide Row Spacing

Abstract Three row spacings and two planting dates for peanuts, Arachis hypogaea L., were examined in 1993 and 1994 to determine the influence of the canopy environment on lesser cornstalk borer, Elasmopalpus lignosellus (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), other arthropods, and alflatoxigenic fungi. Climatically, 1993 and 1994 were disparate years. Decreasing row spacing increased relative leaf area and light interception by the canopy but, compared to difference between planting dates or years, had a relatively small impact on soil temperatures and relative humidity within the canopy. Late planting produced smaller plants, retarded canopy development, and reduced yield in both years, but especially in 1993 when it was hot and dry. The wide row spacing did not yield as well as twin and normal row spacings in either year. Lesser cornstalk borer damage and aflatoxin concentration were higher in the late planting than in the early planting of 1993, but were unaffected by row spacing. Fewer predatory arthropods were caught as row spacing decreased in both beat and pitfall samples, but planting date had variable effects. Prevailing climatic conditions and planting date appeared to be more important in influencing the canopy environment and pest densities than was row spacing.

Growth dynamics of determinate soybean in narrow and wide rows at late planting dates

1990 ◽  
Vol 25 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 203-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.E. Board ◽  
B.G. Harville ◽  
A.M. Saxton
Keyword(s):  
Growth Dynamics ◽  
Planting Dates ◽  
Late Planting

scholarly journals Integrated Management of Haricot Bean Foliage Beetle in Northeastern Ethiopia

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Setu Bazie ◽  
Yohannes Ebabuye ◽  
Sang Woo Kim ◽  
Youn Su Lee
Keyword(s):  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Integrated Management ◽  
Maximum Yield ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Planting Dates ◽  
Late Planting ◽  
Seed Dressing ◽  
Net Profit ◽  
Beetle Damage ◽  
The Cost

A field experiment was conducted to determine the integrated effect of planting dates, insecticides, and their interaction on the reduction of yield and yield related components of haricot bean caused by haricot bean foliage beetle damage at Sirinka Agriculture Research Center, Ethiopia. Planting dates were normal planting (NP) and late planting (10 days after normal planting) (LP), while insecticides comprised Apron star seed dressing (A) and without insecticide (WI). The combined analysis revealed that late planting combined with Apron star seed dressing (LPA) resulted in the highest yield (1223.7 Kg/ha). On the other hand, normal planting date without insecticide application (NPWI) gave the lowest yield (209.6 kg/ha) and the maximum yield loss (209.6%). The cost-benefit analysis showed that use of LPA gave by far better high net profit over control. Thus, LPA are recommended for haricot bean foliage beetle management in northeastern Ethiopia.

EFFECTIVE FLOWERING TIME VARIATIONS IN UPLAND COTTON (GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM) AT DIFFERENT PLANTING DATES AND STAND DENSITIES IN BENIN

2007 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
EMMANUEL SEKLOKA ◽  
BERNARD HAU ◽  
ERIC GOZÉ ◽  
SYLVIE LEWICKI ◽  
GRÉGOIRE THOMAS ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gossypium Hirsutum ◽  
Flowering Time ◽  
Growth Cycle ◽  
Planting Dates ◽  
Flower Opening ◽  
Late Planting ◽  
Breeding Programmes ◽  
Cycle Lengths ◽  
Time Variations ◽  
The Difference

Effective flowering time in Gossypium hirsutum cotton plants was studied with the aim of enhancing decision making on the best varieties to plant according to the planting date under rainfed cropping conditions. Trials were conducted at two sites in a cotton-growing area of Benin in 2002 and 2003. A split-split plot design with three replicates was used to compare 10 cotton varieties, with different growth cycle lengths and morphology, at three stand densities (42 000, 125 000, 167 000 plants ha−1) and two planting dates (standard planting in June and late planting). The flowering period was characterized by the mean first flower opening date (FF), which is an indicator of flowering earliness, and by the opening date of the last flower giving rise to a first-position boll on fruiting branches (LFP1). Effective flowering time (EFT) was calculated as the difference between LFP1 and FF. EFTs differed markedly in the 10 cotton varieties tested and this parameter could not be predicted on the basis of flowering earliness. Late planting and high planting rates delayed first-flower opening, accelerated last-boll development and reduced the effective flowering time. This latter factor should be taken into account in cotton breeding programmes so that varieties adapted to local rainfall constraints can be recommended to growers while also enhancing crop management sequences.

scholarly journals THE INFLUENCE OF PLANTING DATES AND DOSES OF FERTILIZERS ON THE INFECTION OF POTATO SPROUTS WITH RHISOCTONIA SOLANI KUHN AND MISCELLANEUS ROT TYPES

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 68-72
Author(s):  
R. V. Ilchuk ◽  
L. A. Ilchuk
Keyword(s):  
Mineral Fertilizers ◽  
Planting Dates ◽  
Manure Application ◽  
Late Planting ◽  
Early Planting ◽  
Planting Material ◽  
Early Maturing ◽  
Maturity Groups

The infection of potato planting material depends on the planting timing, doses of fertilizers and maturity groups of varieties. The largest (2.8–3.7 %) amount of tubers infected with Phisoctonia Solani Kuhn was observed in the variants with early planting dates. At late planting the reduced tubers infection with the black scab was observed, along with the increased moldering of planting tubers from 0.4 % to 7.2 % especially for early maturing varieties. Higher tubers infection (2.2–2.6 %) with black scab was noticed in variants with manure application (40 t/ha). Application of mineral fertilizers on manure background had resulted in the decrease of black scab infection of tubers by 0.8–0.9 %.

scholarly journals NC 98-608: MANAGING THE POTENTIAL NEW SWEETPOTATO (Ipomea batatas) CLONE RELEASE

HortScience ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 869b-869
Author(s):  
Allan C. Thornton ◽  
Jonathan R. Schultheis
Keyword(s):  
Yield Potential ◽  
Row Spacing ◽  
Harvest Time ◽  
Planting Dates ◽  
Late Planting ◽  
Early Planting ◽  
Ipomea Batatas ◽  
Early Harvest ◽  
Over Time ◽  
Made In

The goal of this research was to determine the effects of in-row spacing and planting time on yield and root grade of NC 98-608 over time. Two plantings were made in two grower locations (four total). An early planting was made 19 and 25 May and a late planting 19 and 24 June. NC 98-608 was evaluated at the following in-row spacings; 23, 31, 38, and 46 cm. `Beauregard' spaced at 23 cm in-row and was used as the standard comparison. Roots were harvested and graded into canner, number one, jumbo and cull grades 90, 105, and 120 days after planting for each of the planting dates and locations. Each grade was weighed. An early planting in late May resulted in roots reaching the highest percentage grade of U.S. number one roots as early as 100 days after planting, while the late planting in June resulted in roots never reaching their full number one yield potential in some cases. For an early harvest after planting (90 days after planting) the 38 cm in-row spacing produced the most marketable number one yields compared with the 23, 31, and 46 cm in-row spacings. For a later harvest time after planting (105 days or later), it appeared as though the 31 cm in-row spacing was the most economical spacing to use. Roots from the early plantings (late May) and finer textured soils appeared to have shorter roots than roots harvested from later plantings (after 15 June) or coarser textured soil. Root shape and yield was more uniform with NC 98-608 than with the Beauregard clone. With yields comparable to Beauregard, the NC 98-608 clone provides an excellent opportunity to produce a quality sweetpotato with consistent shape.

scholarly journals Effect of planting date on the incidence of eggplant aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover and yield of eggplant

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-194
Author(s):  
M. Matiur Rahman ◽  
Pankoj Kumar Sarker ◽  
Bidhan Chandra Das
Keyword(s):  
Aphis Gossypii ◽  
Planting Date ◽  
Aphid Population ◽  
Planting Dates ◽  
Plant Yield ◽  
Late Planting ◽  
Aphis Gossypii Glover ◽  
Crops Yield

Impact of planting dates on Aphis gossypii Glover infestation and yields of eggplants was studied in the field. The aphid population was very low (4.75-31.05 aphids/plant) on the first planted crops. Yield of first planting dates were higher (1.56-3.58 kg/plant), however; aphid population on the successive late planting crops gradually increased and reached to peaks at third planting dates (15.51- 96.46 aphids/plant). Yield of eggplant gradually decreased on successive late planting crops and lowest yield recorded for third planting crops (1.06-1.88 kg/plant).DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjz.v39i2.10585 Bangladesh J. Zool. 39(2): 187-194, 2011   

scholarly journals Effects of planting time on growth, development and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-50
Author(s):  
Jiban Shrestha ◽  
Manoj Kandel ◽  
Amit Chaudhary
Keyword(s):  
Growth And Development ◽  
Crop Production ◽  
Disease Incidence ◽  
Grain Filling ◽  
Planting Date ◽  
Crop Modeling ◽  
Planting Dates ◽  
Late Planting ◽  
Maize Growth ◽  
Growth Development

Planting date plays important role in the growth, development and yield of maize. Optimum planting date has becomes a prime importance for higher crop production. The plant establishment as well as pest and disease incidence are affected by planting dates. Crop varieties respond differently to planting dates. Early or late planting dates on maize causes an array of morpho-anatomical, physiological and biochemical changes in plants, which affect plant growth and development and such changes may lead to a drastic reduction in yield. Maize growth and development involves numerous biochemical reactions which are sensitive to variance in weather parameters as affected by planting dates. Delayed planting dates affect traits namely anthesis silking interval, photosynthesis, physiological maturity and dry matter production due to reduction in cumulative interception of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). Late planting dates cause higher non-structural carbohydrate concentration in stems at mid-grain filling stages due to low temperature exposure of crop limiting kernel growth and photosynthesis. The adverse effects of delayed planting dates can be mitigated by forecasting optimum planting dates through crop modeling experiments. This article summarizes various effects of planting dates on maize growth, development and yield parameters. This information may be useful for maize growers and researchers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document