A SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FOR THE PRACTICE OF SOME MODERN TECHNIQUES OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION (RICE-STRAW RECYCLING) IN SHARKIA GOVERNORATE – EGYPT التحلیل الاجتماعی والاقتصادی لممارسة بعض الأسالیب الحدیثة لصیانة البیئة المتعلقة بتدویر قش الأرز بمحافظة الشرقیة-مصر

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (11) ◽  
pp. 1077-1093
Author(s):  
محمد إبراهیم ◽  
أیمن عکرش
Keyword(s):  
Economic Analysis ◽  
Rice Straw ◽  
Environmental Conservation

Profitable biomethane production from delignified rice straw biomass: the effect of lignin, energy and economic analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (22) ◽  
pp. 8024-8035
Author(s):  
S. Kavitha ◽  
R. Yukesh Kannah ◽  
S. Kasthuri ◽  
M. Gunasekaran ◽  
Arulazhagan Pugazhendi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Analysis ◽  
Rice Straw ◽  
Time Saving ◽  
Biomethane Production

A cost and time saving strategy for the recovery of biomethane from rice straw using a novel phase-separated pretreatment.

scholarly journals An economic analysis of rice straw microwave pyrolysis for hydrogen-rich fuel gas

RSC Advances ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (84) ◽  
pp. 53396-53400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuhui Li ◽  
Kunquan Li ◽  
Chunlei Geng ◽  
Hamed El Mashad ◽  
Hua Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Analysis ◽  
Rice Straw ◽  
Fuel Gas ◽  
Microwave Pyrolysis ◽  
Biomass Resource ◽  
Potential Applications

Rice straw is an abundant biomass resource, and it can produce hydrogen-rich fuel gas through microwave pyrolysis, so it has many potential applications.

scholarly journals Techno-economic analysis of bioethanol production from rice straw by liquid-state fermentation

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 012048 ◽  
Author(s):  
M H M Hidayata ◽  
S F Salleh ◽  
T M I Riayatsyahb ◽  
H B Aditiyac ◽  
T M I Mahliaa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Analysis ◽  
Rice Straw ◽  
Liquid State ◽  
Bioethanol Production

scholarly journals Foraging Wild Resources and Sustainable Economic Development

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serge Svizzero
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Economic Analysis ◽  
Economic System ◽  
Poverty Alleviation ◽  
Environmental Conservation ◽  
Intensive Exploitation ◽  
Wild Resources ◽  
Mode Of Production ◽  
Marginal Trade

<p><em>As exemplified by the MDGs’ adoption in 2000, it was recently thought that poverty alleviation, hunger reduction and environmental conservation should be tackle simultaneously. For that purpose, forests people had to intensively exploit and to commercialize the wild resources (NTFPs) they usually foraged from the nature for their self-consumption and for marginal trade. After a first wave of optimism, most studies have however concluded that such outcome was dubious, i.e.</em><em>,</em><em> that foraging was not able to sustain economic development. We consider a theoretical framework and provide an economic analysis explaining such result. We identify four cases, according to two distinctions. First, foraged wild resources can be used either for self-consumption or traded on the market. Second, foraging can be either an exclusive mode of production or be combined with farming. However, an economic development based on the intensive exploitation of wild resources (through specialized foraging and trade) is not sustainable in the long-term. When considered as an economic system, the persistence of foraging wild resources is only consistent with self-consumption or with marginal trade. Intensive foraging dedicated to trade and market extension lead to the disappearance of sharing (or cooperation) between foragers; wild resources as well as most foragers are likely to get worse in such situation even though some counter-examples can be identified.</em></p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document