scholarly journals Locator versus Ball and Socket Attachment Systems for Single Implant Retained Mandibular Overdenture (Retention -Oral health related quality of life)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-115
Author(s):  
Mostafa Fayad ◽  
M Osman ◽  
D Haddad ◽  
M Quassemc
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Mandibular Overdenture ◽  
Single Implant

Bite Force, Masseter Thickness, and Oral Health–Related Quality of Life of Elderly People with a Single-Implant Mandibular Overdenture

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 503-508
Author(s):  
Camilla do Amaral ◽  
Mayara Pinheiro ◽  
Mariana Câmara-Souza ◽  
Talita Carletti ◽  
Renata Rodrigues Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Elderly People ◽  
Bite Force ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Mandibular Overdenture ◽  
Single Implant

scholarly journals Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Single Implant Mandibular Overdenture Retained by CM LOC versus Ball Attachment: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (21) ◽  
pp. 3642-3646
Author(s):  
Marwa AbdelAal ◽  
Ahmed Fayyad ◽  
Nora Sheta ◽  
Nouran AbdelNabi ◽  
Mahmoud Mokhtar ELFar
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Edentulous Patients ◽  
Mandibular Overdenture ◽  
Single Implant

AIM: This randomised clinical study aimed to detect whether CMLOC attachment could improve Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQOL) when compared to ball attachment. METHODS: Eighty edentulous patients were recruited to receive a single symphyseal implant for mandibular overdenture, after three months, randomisation was done to divide them into two groups; Dalbo ball (control group) and Cendres and Metaux locator (CM-LOC) (intervention) attachments respectively, oral health impact profile for edentulous patients (OHIP-EDENT)questionnaire was recorded before implant placement, two weeks after pick up, at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. RESULTS: Results revealed a lack of statistical significance between the two groups except for psychological discomfort at 2 weeks after pick-up (p-value = 0.029) CONCLUSION: Single implant overdenture is a simple, reliable treatment modality for treating edentulous mandible and both CM LOC and Ball attachments are good alternatives for such treatment modality.

scholarly journals Oral Health Related Quality of Life of Patients Using Conventional Dentures versus Implant-Supported Overdentures

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramtin Azar ◽  
Hassan Semyari ◽  
Mohamad Javad Kharazifard
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Mandibular Overdenture

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL) of patients using conventional dentures versus implant-supported overdentures. Materials and Methods: This study evaluated the OHRQoL of 90 patients between 35 to 75 years who were selected from several public and private dental clinics in Tehran in 2018. Of all, 45 had conventional dentures of both jaws, and 45 had a mandibular overdenture supported by two implants at the site of mandibular canine teeth and a conventional maxillary denture. The OHRQoL of patients was determined using the Oral Health Impact Prfile-20 (OHIP-20). The questionnaire was translated to Persian, and its content validity and internal consistency were confirmed. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, Mann-Whitney test, and independent t-test. Results: In the conventional denture group, 46.7% had good, 46.7% had moderate, and 6.6% had poor OHRQoL. These values were 55.6%, 37.8% and 6.6% in the overdenture group, respectively. Level of education had a significant correlation with the total score of OHIP-20 in both groups (P<0.05). But no significant association was noted between the residential status and gender of patients with different domains of OHRQoL (P>0.05) except for the psychological disability domain, which had a higher mean value in males with conventional dentures (P<0.05). Conclusion: Patients with a mandibular overdenture supported by two implants at the site of canine teeth and a conventional maxillary denture had higher OHRQoL than patients with conventional dentures of both jaws.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Oral Health Related Quality of Life in Different Telescopic Two-implant Supported Mandibular Overdenture

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (D) ◽  
pp. 210-214
Author(s):  
Diana K. Shehata ◽  
Emad M. Agamy ◽  
Gihan F. Mohammed
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Great Satisfaction ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Mandibular Overdenture

AIM: The purpose of the study was to evaluate patient’s oral health related quality of life using oral health impact profile (OHIP14) in rigid and non-rigid telescopic two-implant supported mandibular overdenture patients. METHODS: Twelve completely edentulous patients received two mandibular interforaminal implants to retain telescopic overdenture opposed by maxillary complete denture. Group I (six patients) had rigid telescopic connection and Group II (six patients) received non-rigid telescopic attachments. OHIP14 questionnaire was translated in Arabic and orally asked the patients, answers were collected soon after denture insertion and use (within 1 week), 6 and 12 months after using the overdenture to assess patient’s quality of life. RESULTS: There was no statistical significant difference regarding quality of life using OHIP14 questionnair between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Telescopic two-implant mandibular overdenture showed high quality of life, great satisfaction, and acceptance among patients; regardless to the type of attachments rigid or non-rigid.

Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Among Sudanese Children Treated for Cleft Lip and Palate

2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562098769
Author(s):  
Mecheala Abbas Ali ◽  
Alwaleed Fadul Nasir ◽  
Shaza K. Abass
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Arabic Version ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Objective: This study compared the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among children with a cleft lip with or without a cleft palate (CL±P) and a group of their peers. The reliability of the Arabic version of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile Questionnaire (COHIP) was also assessed. Design: A cross-sectional study. Settings: Cleft clinic in a private dental college in Omdurman City, Sudan. Patients: In all, 75 children (mean age 11.3 ± 2.5 years) with a history of CL±P and a group of 150 school children without CL±P (mean age 11.4 ± 2.6 years). Main Outcome Measures: Overall and subscale scores on the Arabic version of the COHIP. Results: Test–retest reliability of COHIP in Arabic was high with an interclass correlation coefficient >0.8. Cronbach α value internal consistency was 0.8 for the total scale and between 0.7 and 0.8 for the subscales. The COHIP score was 89.41 ± 19.97 in children with CL±P and 122.82 ± 9.45 for the control group. Children with CL±P had significantly lower scores on the overall and all subscales when compared to children without CL±P ( P ≤ .001). Among the children with CL±P, there were no statistically significant differences on the COHIP based on age and/or gender ( P ≥ .05). Conclusions: Children with CL±P had a relatively high OHRQoL, which was lower than that of their peers without CL±P in both the overall scale and all subscales. Gender and age differences had no significant impact on the OHRQoL. The COHIP Arabic version showed appropriate reliability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document