Contemporary Automotive Infotainment Solutions to Empower Front-Seat Passengers

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guzin Sen ◽  
◽  
Bahar Sener ◽  
Mike Jump
Keyword(s):  
Front Seat

Stories from the Front Seat

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (CSCW) ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin N. Brewer ◽  
Amy M. Austin ◽  
Nicole B. Ellison
Keyword(s):  
Front Seat

scholarly journals Accommodating Taste and Scale Heterogeneity for Front-Seat Passenger’ Choice of Seat Belt Usage

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahdi Rezapour ◽  
Khaled Ksaibati
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Model ◽  
Seat Belt ◽  
Model Fit ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Extended Model ◽  
Random Parameters ◽  
Front Seat ◽  
Scale Heterogeneity ◽  
Error Terms ◽  
The Cost

There is growing interest in implementation of the mixed model to account for heterogeneity across population observations. However, it has been argued that the assumption of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d) error terms might not be realistic, and for some observations the scale of the error is greater than others. Consequently, that might result in the error terms’ scale to be varied across those observations. As the standard mixed model could not account for the aforementioned attribute of the observations, extended model, allowing for scale heterogeneity, has been proposed to relax the equal error terms across observations. Thus, in this study we extended the mixed model to the model with heterogeneity in scale, or generalized multinomial logit model (GMNL), to see if accounting for the scale heterogeneity, by adding more flexibility to the distribution, would result in an improvement in the model fit. The study used the choice data related to wearing seat belt across front-seat passengers in Wyoming, with all attributes being individual-specific. The results highlighted that although the effect of the scale parameter was significant, the scale effect was trivial, and accounting for the effect at the cost of added parameters would result in a loss of model fit compared with the standard mixed model. Besides considering the standard mixed and the GMNL, the models with correlated random parameters were considered. The results highlighted that despite having significant correlation across the majority of the random parameters, the goodness of fits favors more parsimonious models with no correlation. The results of this study are specific to the dataset used in this study, and due to the possible fact that the heterogeneity in observations related to the front-seat passengers seat belt use might not be extreme, and do not require extra layer to account for the scale heterogeneity, or accounting for the scale heterogeneity at the cost of added parameters might not be required. Extensive discussion has been made in the content of this paper about the model parameters’ estimations and the mathematical formulation of the methods.

scholarly journals Using Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System (CODES) to examine injury in front vs. rear-seated infants and children involved in a motor vehicle crash in New York State

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Bauer ◽  
Leah Hines ◽  
Emilia Pawlowski ◽  
Jin Luo ◽  
Anne Scott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Evaluation System ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
New York State ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Crash Severity ◽  
Front Seat ◽  
York State ◽  
Child Restraint ◽  
Ed Visits

Abstract Background In New York State (NYS), motor vehicle (MV) injury to child passengers is a leading cause of hospitalization and emergency department (ED) visits in children aged 0–12 years. NYS laws require appropriate child restraints for ages 0–7 years and safety belts for ages 8 and up while traveling in a private passenger vehicle, but do not specify a seating position. Methods Factors associated with injury in front-seated (n = 11,212) compared to rear-seated (n = 93,092) passengers aged 0–12 years were examined by age groups 0–3, 4–7 and 8–12 years using the 2012–2014 NYS Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System (CODES). CODES consists of Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) crash reports linked to ED visits and hospitalizations. The front seat was row 1 and the rear rows 2–3. Vehicle towed from scene and air bag deployed were proxies for crash severity. Injury was dichotomized based on Maximum Abbreviated Injury Severity (MAIS) scores greater than zero. Multivariable logistic regression (odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI) was used to examine factors predictive of injury for the total population and for each age group. Results Front-seated children had more frequent injury than those rear-seated (8.46% vs. 4.92%, p < 0.0001). Children in child restraints experienced fewer medically-treated injuries compared to seat belted or unrestrained children (3.80, 6.50 and 13.62%, p < 0.0001 respectively). A higher proportion of children traveling with an unrestrained vs. restrained driver experienced injury (14.50% vs 5.26%, p < 0.0001). After controlling for crash severity, multivariable adjusted predictors of injury for children aged 0–12 years included riding in the front seat (1.20, 1.10–1.31), being unrestrained vs. child restraint (2.13, 1.73–2.62), being restrained in a seat belt vs. child restraint (1.20, 1.11–1.31), and traveling in a car vs. other vehicle type (1.21, 1.14–1.28). Similarly, protective factors included traveling with a restrained driver (0.61, 0.50–0.75), a driver aged < 25 years (0.91, 0.82–0.99), being an occupant of a later vehicle model year 2005–2008 (0.68, 0.53–0.89) or 2009–2015 (0.55, 0.42–0.71) compared to older model years (1970–1993). Conclusions Compared to front-seated children, rear-seated children and children in age-appropriate restraints had lower adjusted odds of medically-treated injury.

scholarly journals Factors associated with chest injuries to front seat occupants in frontal impacts

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (sup2) ◽  
pp. S37-S42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karthikeyan Ekambaram ◽  
Richard Frampton ◽  
James Lenard
Keyword(s):  
Front Seat ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Frontal Impacts ◽  
Chest Injuries

Upper Extremity Injuries in Restrained Front-Seat Occupants After Motor Vehicle Crashes

2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 838-844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Chong ◽  
Guy Broome ◽  
Dhirendra Mahadeva ◽  
Stewart Wang
Keyword(s):  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Motor Vehicle Crashes ◽  
Vehicle Crashes ◽  
Front Seat ◽  
Extremity Injuries

scholarly journals Mechanisms of Fractures in Ankle and Hind-Foot Injuries to Front Seat Car Occupants - An In-Depth Accident Data Analysis

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Morris ◽  
Pete Thomas ◽  
Andrew M. Taylor ◽  
W. Angus Wallace ◽  
Andrew M. Taylor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Front Seat ◽  
Foot Injuries ◽  
Accident Data ◽  
Hind Foot

Severe-to-Fatal Injury Risks in Crashes With Two Front-Seat Occupants by Seat Belt Use

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 294-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Viano ◽  
Chantal S. Parenteau
Keyword(s):  
Seat Belt ◽  
Front Seat ◽  
Fatal Injury ◽  
Seat Belt Use

CHILDREN IN TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 847-854
Author(s):  
G. Anthony Ryan
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Traffic Accidents ◽  
The United States ◽  
Rear Seat ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Front Seat ◽  
Severe Injuries ◽  
Rural Highways ◽  
Points Of View ◽  
Seating Position

The part that children play in traffic accidents has been studied by numerous workers from differing points of view. Slätis,1 in a study of 5,291 persons injured in traffic accidents and receiving medical treatment in Sweden, found that 16.3% were less than 15 years of age. An examination by Mackay2 of a series of 250 accidents investigated at the scene in Birmingham, England, found that children less than 16 years of age formed 6.2% of the 464 persons involved. In Brisbane, Australia, Jamieson and Tait3 found that children less than 15 years old formed 10.9% of a group of 1,000 admissions or deaths from traffic accidents. Gädeke4 in Germany, found children less than 15 years old were injured more often in rural accidents, that traffic accidents formed 35 to 40% of all fatal accidents in children, and that injuries to the head and lower limb were most common. In Sweden, Ekström, et al.5 found that the majority of children involved in accidents they studied were pedestrians or pedal cyclists, and 40% were between 5 and 9 years old. Moore and Lilienfeld6 reported on 31,001 occupants of known age in 14,520 automobiles involved in injury-producing accidents on rural highways in the United States. They found that children less than 12 years of age formed 9%, adolescents age 12 to 18 years formed 16%, and adults of more than 18 years formed 75%. They found that children received fewer and less severe injuries than adolescents or adults, in each seating position. Front seat passengers in each age group were injured more often and more severely than rear seat passengers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document