WORLD RISKS ENDING UP WITHOUT A NUCLEAR ARMS REDUCTION TREATY: U.S. HAS YET TO DECIDE WHETHER TO EXTEND THE NEW START TREATY

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (014-015) ◽  
pp. 17-20
Author(s):  
Yury Paniyev
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Arms

Time for the Abolition of Nuclear Arms

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (12) ◽  
pp. 23-28
Author(s):  
Drew Christiansen
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Arms

New ''Cold War''

2020 ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Vladimir Batiuk
Keyword(s):  
Cold War ◽  
Nuclear Weapons ◽  
Armed Conflict ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Arms Race ◽  
Ideological Struggle ◽  
Nuclear Arms Race ◽  
The Cold War ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Nuclear Arms

In this article, the ''Cold War'' is understood as a situation where the relationship between the leading States is determined by ideological confrontation and, at the same time, the presence of nuclear weapons precludes the development of this confrontation into a large-scale armed conflict. Such a situation has developed in the years 1945–1989, during the first Cold War. We see that something similar is repeated in our time-with all the new nuances in the ideological struggle and in the nuclear arms race.

scholarly journals Russell on technology and common sense

Human Affairs ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 518-525
Author(s):  
Stephen Leach
Keyword(s):  
Common Sense ◽  
Arms Race ◽  
Nuclear Arms Race ◽  
Nuclear Arms

AbstractThis article examines the distinction that Russell drew between his work as a philosopher and his work as a journalist. It explains why, when warning against the threat posed by a nuclear arms race, Russell thought it better to write as a journalist (speaking on behalf of common sense) rather than as a philosopher. It is argued that to put aside philosophy in favour of common sense is, in this instance, a mistake.

Nuclear arms for Iraq

1995 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-33
Author(s):  
Richard Lawson
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Arms

Regional nuclear arms control in Latin America

1975 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 415-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Redick
Keyword(s):  
Latin America ◽  
Mexico City ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Nuclear Weapons ◽  
Nuclear Energy ◽  
Control Mechanism ◽  
Arms Control ◽  
Free Zone ◽  
Nuclear Arms Control ◽  
Nuclear Arms

The Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America (Treaty of Tlatelolco) was signed in 1967 and is now in force for eighteen Latin American nations (the important exceptions being Argentina and Brazil). Under the terms of the treaty the Organization for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America (OPANAL) was established in 1969. With headquarters in Mexico City, OPANAL is a sophisticated control mechanism composed of three principal organs: a General Conference, Council and Secretariat. This article examines the effort to establish regional nuclear weapons free zone in Latin America and analyzes the ability of the Tlatelolco Treaty to provide the legal and political framework for containment of the growing military potential of Latin American nuclear energy programs. Particular attention is given to the positions of key Latin American nations within the region, nuclear weapons states, and those nations retaining territorial interest within the nuclear weapons free zone. In addition several policy options are advanced which could facilitate the more complete implementation of regional nuclear arms control in Latin America.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document