scholarly journals “EFFECT OF APPLICATION OF REMINERALIZATION AGENTS ON MICROHARDNESS & SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF THE ENAMEL SURFACE AFTER INTERPROXIMAL STRIPPING – IN VIVO STUDY”.

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 922-931
Author(s):  
Hina Desai ◽  
Pooja Yadav ◽  
Sarvesh Agrawal ◽  
Kalpesh Patel ◽  
Malhar Oza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Enamel Surface ◽  
In Vivo Study

scholarly journals Evaluation of enamel roughness after the removal of brackets bonded with different materials: In vivo study

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 34-40
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Vieira Caixeta ◽  
Sandrine Bittencourt Berger ◽  
Murilo Baena Lopes ◽  
Eloisa Aparecida Carlesse Paloco ◽  
Élcio Mário Faria-Júnior ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Initial Conditions ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Enamel Surface ◽  
In Vivo Study ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Orthodontic Patients

Abstract The aims of this in vivo study were to evaluate the effect of bonding with resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and to assess enamel surface roughness before and after the removal of brackets bonded with composite or RMGIC from the maxillary central incisors. Fifteen orthodontic patients were selected for the study. For each patient, the teeth were rinsed and dried, and brackets were bonded with composite (Transbond XT) and RMGIC (Vitremer Core Buildup/Restorative). At the conclusion of orthodontic treatment, their brackets were removed. Dental replicas were made of epoxy resin in initial conditions (before bonded) and after polishing with an aluminum oxide disc system. Adhesive remnant index (ARI) and surface roughness was measured on the dental replicas and data were evaluated statistically by Mann-Whitney and paired t-test, respectively. No bracket debonding occurred during patients’ treatment periods. It was verified that the ARI values of the two maxillary central incisors were similar (p = 0.665). For both bonding materials, the ARI value of 3 was predominant. After polishing, surface roughness was similar in the composite and RMGIC groups (0.245 μm and 0.248 μm, respectively; p = 0.07). In both groups, enamel surface roughness values were significantly lower after polishing compared with the initial condition (p < 0.001). RMGIC promoted efficiency in cementing brackets without fail during treatment; the choice of composite or RMGIC materials was not a factor that influenced the roughness of the enamel surface, however, polishing led to smoother surfaces than those found at the beginning of the treatment.

scholarly journals Remineralization and repair of enamel surface by biomimetic Zn-carbonate hydroxyapatite containing toothpaste: a comparative in vivo study

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Lelli ◽  
Angelo Putignano ◽  
Marco Marchetti ◽  
Ismaela Foltran ◽  
Francesco Mangani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enamel Surface ◽  
In Vivo Study ◽  
Carbonate Hydroxyapatite

The influence of surface free energy and surface roughness on early plaque formation. An in vivo study in man

1990 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 138-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Quirynen ◽  
M. Marechal ◽  
H. J. Busscher ◽  
A. H. Weerkamp ◽  
P. L. Darius ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Free Energy ◽  
Surface Free Energy ◽  
Plaque Formation ◽  
In Vivo Study

Surface Roughness of Acrylic and Silicone-Based Soft Liners: In Vivo Study in a Rat Model

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Bail ◽  
Janaina Habib Jorge ◽  
Vanessa Migliorini Urban ◽  
Nara Hellen Campanha
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Rat Model ◽  
In Vivo Study

Effect of Two In-office Whitening Agents on the Enamel Surface In Vivo: A Morphological and Non-contact Profilometric Study

10.2341/07-89 ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Cadenaro ◽  
L. Breschi ◽  
C. Nucci ◽  
F. Antoniolli ◽  
E. Visintini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Structural Damage ◽  
Enamel Surface ◽  
In Vivo Study ◽  
Repeated Applications ◽  
Reliable Procedure

Clinical Relevance This in vivo study supports the hypothesis that the use of in-office bleaching agents is a safe and reliable procedure, inducing no structural damage to the enamel surface, even after prolonged and repeated applications.

Titanium release from implants prepared with different surface roughness. An in vitro and in vivo study

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 505-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Wennerberg ◽  
Ari Ide-Ektessabi ◽  
Shino Hatkamata ◽  
Takashi Sawase ◽  
Carina Johansson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
In Vivo Study

scholarly journals Bionic effects of nano hydroxyapatite dentifrice on demineralised surface of enamel post orthodontic debonding: in-vivo split mouth study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Purva Verma ◽  
Srirengalakshmi Muthuswamy Pandian
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Enamel Surface ◽  
Roughness Parameters ◽  
Force Microscopy ◽  
Atomic Force ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Envelope Method ◽  
Group Ii

Abstract Background Orthodontic debonding procedure produces inevitable enamel surface alterations, sequelae to which are enamel demineralization, sensitivity and retention of pigments. Several agents have been employed to counterbalance the same. The purpose of this study was (1) To evaluate the hypothesis that no significant difference exists in the remineralising potential of nano hydroxyapatite (NanoHAP) dentifrice and fluoridated dentifrice after orthodontic debonding, (2) To estimate the enamel topographic parameters following use of nano HAP dentifrice, post orthodontic debonding. Methods Sixty upper first bi-cuspids (30 subjects) planned for therapeutic extraction for the orthodontic treatment were bonded with a light cured adhesive. Envelope method of randomisation was followed in this prospective in-vivo study. In each subject, one of the first premolar brackets was debonded using a debonding plier and polished following standard protocols. Envelope method of randomisation was used to determine the side of the premolar to be debonded first. Patient was advised to use fluoridated (Group I) dentifrice for the first 15 days, then the first premolar was covered with a heavy-bodied putty cap, extracted and subjected to atomic force microscopy (AFM). Contralateral first premolar was then debonded and polished using similar protocol, and patient was advised to use nano hydroxyapatite dentifrice (Group II) for next 15 days. The premolar was then extracted and analyzed for surface roughness using AFM. The remineralizing potential of dentifrices was assessed by evaluating surface roughness parameters of the two groups and were compared using a two-sample t test. Results A significant difference was found amongst Group I (Fluoridated dentifrice) and Group II (NanoHAP dentifrice) (p > 0.001***) for enamel surface roughness variables which reflect remineralising potential of dentifrices. Group II showed significantly lesser value of surface roughness characteristics. Conclusions NanoHAP dentifrice was shown, after 15 days, to be superior to fluoridated dentifrice in remineralising enamel post orthodontic debonding.

An in vivo Study of the Influence of the Surface Roughness of Implants on the Microbiology of Supra- and Subgingival Plaque

1993 ◽  
Vol 72 (9) ◽  
pp. 1304-1309 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Quirynen ◽  
H.C. Van Der Mei ◽  
C.M.L. Bollen ◽  
A. Schotte ◽  
M. Marechal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
In Vivo Study ◽  
Subgingival Plaque
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document