scholarly journals Novel stroke risk reduction in atrial fibrillation: left atrial appendage occlusion with a focus on the Watchman closure device

2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 81-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arash Alipour ◽  
Lisette I S Wintgens ◽  
Martin J Swaans ◽  
Jippe C Balt ◽  
Benno JWM Rensing ◽  
...  
Kidney360 ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 10.34067/KID.0004082021
Author(s):  
Srikanth Vallurupalli ◽  
Tanya Sharma ◽  
Subhi Al'Aref ◽  
Subodh R. Devabhaktuni ◽  
Gaurav Dhar

Anticoagulation to reduce thromboembolic stroke risk due to nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in ESRD is associated with increased bleeding. Existing debate in ESRD centers around the pros and cons of anticoagulation. We propose percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion as a third alternative to balance thrombosis and bleeding risks in this high risk population.


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon O Armstrong ◽  
Stacey L Amorosi ◽  
Susan S Garfield ◽  
Ken Stein

Introduction: Strokes associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) are estimated to cost Medicare $8 billion annually. Advancements in stroke prevention are aimed at improving clinical outcomes and reducing healthcare costs. This analysis quantifies the budget impact to Medicare and Medicare beneficiaries of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with the Watchman Device compared to warfarin, the standard of care, and rivaroxaban, the most commonly prescribed new oral anticoagulant in the US, for stroke risk reduction in non-valvular AF. Methods: A budget impact model was developed from a Medicare perspective using 2.3-year data from PROTECT AF and relative risks from ROCKET AF. The model captured all costs of treatment and associated complications. Costs for stroke included acute, direct costs as well as long-term disability costs. Cost data were from 2014 US DRGs. Medicare deductibles and co-insurance rates were used in the patient analysis. Results: In addition to better net clinical outcomes (table), LAAC is cost neutral to Medicare relative to warfarin and rivaroxaban by year 5, and one third less costly than both by year 10. Treatment-related complications comprised 33% of LAAC total costs compared to 65% for rivaroxaban and 87% for warfarin at year 5. Patient out-of-pocket costs for LAAC were lower than warfarin and rivaroxaban at 2 and 3 years, respectively. Conclusions: Upfront LAAC procedural costs are offset by ongoing therapy and complication costs associated with warfarin and rivaroxaban. LAAC with Watchman represents an opportunity for improved clinical outcomes and substantial savings to both Medicare and Medicare beneficiaries.


2003 ◽  
Vol 42 (7) ◽  
pp. 1249-1252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph L Blackshear ◽  
W.Dudley Johnson ◽  
John A Odell ◽  
Vickie S Baker ◽  
Mary Howard ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. e044695
Author(s):  
Mu Chen ◽  
Qunshan Wang ◽  
Jian Sun ◽  
Peng-Pai Zhang ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
...  

IntroductionIt is the common clinical practice to prescribe indefinite aspirin for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) post left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). However, aspirin as a primary prevention strategy for cardiovascular diseases has recently been challenged due to increased risk of bleeding. Therefore, aspirin discontinuation after LAAO in atrial fibrillation (ASPIRIN LAAO) trial is designed to assess the uncertainty about the risks and benefits of discontinuing aspirin therapy at 6 months postimplantation with a Watchman LAAO device in NVAF patients.Methods and analysisThe ASPIRIN LAAO study is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled non-inferiority trial. Patients implanted with a Watchman device within 6 months prior to enrollment and without pre-existing conditions requiring long-term aspirin therapy according to current guidelines are eligible for participating the trial. Subjects will be randomised in a 1:1 allocation ratio to either the Aspirin group (aspirin 100 mg/day) or the control group (placebo) at 6 months postimplantation. A total of 1120 subjects will be enrolled from 12 investigational sites in China. The primary composite endpoint is stroke, systemic embolism, cardiovascular/unexplained death, major bleeding, acute coronary syndrome and coronary or periphery artery disease requiring revascularisation at 24 months. Follow-up visits are scheduled at 6 and 12 months and then every 12 months until 24 months after the last patient recruitment.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai, China (reference number XHEC-C-2018-065-5). The protocol is also submitted and approved by the institutional Ethics Committee at each participating centre. Results are expected in 2024 and will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international conferences.Trial registration numberNCT03821883.


Author(s):  
Sven Möbius-Winkler ◽  
Marcus Sandri ◽  
Norman Mangner ◽  
Phillip Lurz ◽  
Ingo Dähnert ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document