scholarly journals Impact of data from recent clinical trials on strategies for treating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

2010 ◽  
pp. 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pasquale Palumbo ◽  
Jonathan Wert
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

scholarly journals Impact of timing of randomization after an acute coronary syndrome and subsequent events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an analysis of the EXAMINE trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Elharram ◽  
A Sharma ◽  
W White ◽  
G Bakris ◽  
P Rossignol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The timing of enrolment following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may influence cardiovascular (CV) outcomes and potentially treatment effect in clinical trials. Using a large contemporary trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) post-ACS, we examined the impact of timing of enrolment on subsequent CV outcomes. Methods EXAMINE was a randomized trial of alogliptin versus placebo in 5380 patients with T2DM and a recent ACS. The primary outcome was a composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction [MI], or non-fatal stroke. The median follow-up was 18 months. In this post hoc analysis, we examined the occurrence of subsequent CV events by timing of enrollment divided by tertiles of time from ACS to randomization: 8–34, 35–56, and 57–141 days. Results Patients randomized early (compared to the latest times) had less comorbidities at baseline including a history of heart failure (HF; 24.7% vs. 33.0%), prior coronary artery bypass graft (9.6% vs. 15.9%), or atrial fibrillation (5.9% vs. 9.4%). Despite the reduced comorbidity burden, the risk of the primary outcome was highest in patients randomized early compared to the latest time (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.47; 95% CI 1.21–1.74) (Figure 1). Similarly, patients randomized early had an increased risk of recurrent MI (aHR 1.51; 95% CI 1.17–1.96) and HF hospitalization (1.49; 95% CI 1.05–2.10). Conclusion In a contemporary cohort of T2DM with a recent ACS, early randomization following the ACS increases the risk of CV events including recurrent MI and HF hospitalization. This should be taken into account when designing future clinical trials. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Takeda Pharmaceutical

Mobile App Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence Among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials

2021 ◽  
pp. 193229682110600
Author(s):  
Tarani Prakash Shrivastava ◽  
Shikha Goswami ◽  
Rahul Gupta ◽  
Ramesh K. Goyal
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Medication Adherence ◽  
Mobile Apps ◽  
Mobile App ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Improve Medication Adherence

Background: Medication adherence in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients is often suboptimal resulting in complications. There has been a growing interest in using mobile apps for improving medication adherence. Objective: The objective of this work was to systematically review the clinical trials that have used mobile app–based interventions in T2DM patients for improving medication adherence. Methodology: A systematic search was performed to identify published clinical trials between January 2008 and December 2020 in databases—PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. All studies were assessed for risk of bias using quality rating tool from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Results: Seven clinical studies having 649 participants were studied. The median sample size was 58 (range = 41-247) and the median age of participants was 53.2 (range = 48-69.4) years. All studies showed improvements in adherence; however, only three studies reported statically significant improvements in adherence measures. Selected studies were deemed as unclear in their risk of bias and the most common source of risk of bias among the studies was the absence of objective outcome assessment. Conclusions: Mobile apps appear to be effective interventions to help improve medication adherence in T2DM patients compared with conventional care strategies. The features of the App to improvise medical adherence cannot be defined based on the meta-analysis because of heterogeneity of study designs and less number of sample size. Systematically planned studies would set up applicability of mobile apps in the clinical management of T2DM.

M1193 Risk of Recurrence of Colorectal Neoplasia Among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Randomized to Placebo in the Polyp Prevention Clinical Trials

2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (5) ◽  
pp. S-351
Author(s):  
Marcia R. Cruz-Correa ◽  
Alejandro Acevedo ◽  
Yaritza Diaz-Algorri ◽  
Maria V. Grau ◽  
John A. Baron
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Colorectal Neoplasia ◽  
Risk Of Recurrence

scholarly journals Periodontal Therapy for Improving Lipid Profiles in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (15) ◽  
pp. 3826 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siddharth Garde ◽  
Rahena Akhter ◽  
Mai Anh Nguyen ◽  
Clara K. Chow ◽  
Joerg Eberhard
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Lipid Profiles ◽  
Periodontal Therapy ◽  
Inflammatory Disorder

Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disorder often seen in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Individuals with diabetes are at a greater risk of developing cardiovascular complications and this may be related, in part, to lipid abnormalities observed in these individuals. The objective of this systematic review is to compile the current scientific evidence of the effects of periodontal treatment on lipid profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Through a systematic search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science, 313 articles were identified. Of these, seven clinical trials which met all inclusion criteria were chosen for analysis. Between baseline and 3-month follow-up, there was a statistically significant reduction in the levels of total cholesterol (mean differences (MD) −0.47 mmol/L (95% confidence interval (CI), −0.75, −0.18, p = 0.001)), triglycerides (MD −0.20 mmol/L (95% CI −0.24, −0.16, p < 0.00001)) favouring the intervention arm, and a statistically significant reduction in levels of high density lipoprotein (HDL) (MD 0.06 mmol/L (95% CI 0.03, 0.08, p < 0.00001)) favouring the control arm. No significant differences were observed between baseline and 6-month follow-up levels for any lipid analysed. The heterogeneity between studies was high. This review foreshadows a potential benefit of periodontal therapy for lipid profiles in patients suffering from type 2 DM, however, well designed clinical trials using lipid profiles as primary outcome measures are warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document