scholarly journals Durable complete remission of poor performance status metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patient treated with second-line erlotinib: a case report

2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 10 ◽  
pp. 4347-4354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dragana Jovanovic ◽  
Ruza Stevic ◽  
Marta Velinovic ◽  
Milica Kontic ◽  
Dragana Maric ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Metastatic Lung ◽  
Lung Adenocarcinoma Patient

Modified FOLFIRINOX as a second-line treatment in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients with poor performance status.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15796-e15796
Author(s):  
Adarsh Das ◽  
Andrew Peter Dean ◽  
Domenic Higgs
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

e15796 Background: FOLFIRINOX is well known to be a highly effective treatment in pancreatic cancer for young patients with good performance status. As the original ACCORD study was carried out with patient’s performance status 0 or 1, many oncologists feel uncertain administering modified dose FOLFIRINOX (m-FOLFIRINOX) as a second-line therapy. We have previously reported our experience in 35 patients (aged 27 – 85) where we concluded that m-FOLFIRINOX can be administered safely with appropriate dose reductions. More recently, the systematic review and meta-analysis by Tong et al. concluded that m-FOLFIRINOX is a good choice of therapy even for those with poor performance status. This retrospective analysis assessed the efficacy of m-FOLFIRINOX in second-line treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: Using an electronic database, patients with either locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were identified who had received first-line gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, followed by second-line m-FOLFIRINOX between January 2013 and July 2018. All patients had an ECOG performance status of 2 or less. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Fifty-two patients were identified, with 65% of the patients having metastatic pancreatic disease. Median age of patients was 75 (range, 27 – 86). Dose intensity of m-FOLFIRINOX was 65% for oxaliplatin, 68% for irinotecan, 18% for bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and 68% for infusional 5-FU. From diagnosis, the median OS of all patients was 45.0 months (95% CI, 25.0 – 63.0). The median OS of the locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma was 63.0 months (95% CI, 45.0 – 70.0) and 22.5 months (95% CI, 18.0, 38.0), respectively. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of m-FOLFIRINOX as a second-line therapy after gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel failure. These findings correlate with the findings of Tong et al.’s findings of the benefits of m-FOLFIRINOX for advanced pancreatic cancer in patients with poor performance status.

Oral chemotherapy as second-line treatment option for gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer with poor performance status.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 405-405
Author(s):  
Se Jun Park ◽  
Myung Ah Lee
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Median Dose ◽  
Gemcitabine Refractory

405 Background: There is few data for effective second-line treatment in advanced pancreatic cancer, and most patients have poor performance status after progressive disease. We evaluated the efficacy, toxicity, and median dose intensity of oral chemotherapy, capecitabine, or TS-1 in gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer for second-line treatment. Methods: Patients who have progressive disease after first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed between Jan. 2011 and Nov. 2017. These patients were treated with capecitabine or TS-1 as second-line treatment. Capecitabine were administered as 2,500 mg/m2 divided dose on day 1-14, followed by one week rest. In TS-1 group, TS-1 was taken orally based on patient’s BSA (60mg twice daily in BSA > 1.5, 50mg twice daily in BSA 1.25-1.5, and 40mg twice daily in BSA < 1.25) through 28 days, by two week rest. Median dose intensity was compared by calculating a percent of target dose achieved in the average cycle for each patient. Results: Of the total 62 patients, 41 patients were treated with capecitabine and 21 patients were treated with TS-1. The median age was 61 years for the capecitabine group compared with 62 years for the TS-1 group. In capecitabine group, males were 56%, and in TS-1 group, males were 66%. 29% of capecitabine group received prior fluorouracil base therapy, and 47% of TS-1 group were receiving such therapy. The objective response rate was similar in the two groups: 12.2% with capecitabine and 4.8% with TS-1 (p = 0.358). There was no difference in median progression free survival between capecitabine and TS-1 (2.1 months vs. 2.7 months, p = 0.102), however, TS-1 group showed better median overall survival time than capecitabine group (6.9 months vs. 4.6 months, p = 0.048). Most of the adverse events were similar in both group, except that grade 3 or 4 mucositis was more common in TS-1 group. There was no significant difference in median dose intensity between two groups. (Capecitabine 91.5% vs. TS-1 90.1%, p = 0.216). Conclusions: Oral agents such as TS-1 or capecitabine can be second-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer patients with poor performance status after progression to gemcitabine-based regimen.

scholarly journals Short remission durations in therapy-related leukemia despite cytogenetic complete responses to high-dose cytarabine

Blood ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 1333-1339
Author(s):  
RA Larson ◽  
M Wernli ◽  
MM Le Beau ◽  
KM Daly ◽  
LH Pape ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Complete Remission ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Bone Marrow Cells ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine

Seventeen patients with therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (t- MDS) or therapy-related acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (t-ANLL) were treated with single-agent high-dose cytarabine (HDAC; 1 to 3 g/m2 every 12 hours for 12 doses). The initial neoplasm was still present in eight patients when t-MDS/t-ANLL developed. Fifteen of the 16 patients with chromosomal abnormalities in bone marrow cells had loss or rearrangement of chromosomes 5 and/or 7. One patient had a t(15;17), and one had inadequate material for cytogenetic analysis. Twelve patients had normal metaphase cells (3% to 71%). Indications for HDAC therapy were progressive pancytopenia in 13 patients or rising blast count in four. Five patients died of marrow hypoplasia following therapy. Four others had refractory t-ANLL and died within the subsequent 5 months. Only one of ten patients with a poor performance status (PS greater than or equal to 2 using the ECOG scale) achieved a complete remission, but all seven patients with a good performance status (PS less than or equal to 1) had a complete remission. Hematologic remissions were achieved in 8 patients (47%) after one (6 patients) or two (2 patients) induction courses and were confirmed by recovery of a 100% normal marrow karyotype in six of the seven patients who were retested. Patients in remission received one to four consolidation courses with HDAC alternating with cytarabine/doxorubicin, but seven relapsed within 8 months (median remission duration, 5 months). In every case, the original chromosomal abnormality reappeared at relapse. HDAC has a high response rate for good-performance patients with t-MDS/t-ANLL, but complete remissions are short even when confirmed cytogenetically and consolidated intensively.

scholarly journals Case Report: Identification of Two Rare Fusions, PDK1-ALK and STRN-ALK, That Coexist in a Lung Adenocarcinoma Patient and the Response to Alectinib

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Zeng ◽  
Yalun Li ◽  
Ye Wang ◽  
Meijuan Huang ◽  
Yan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Alk Inhibitors ◽  
Metastatic Lung ◽  
Lung Adenocarcinoma Patient ◽  
Promising Treatment

Several double ALK fusions coexisting in one patient have been reported. However, few studies have reported the clinical efficacy of ALK inhibitors in rare double ALK fusions. Here, we described a rare PDK1-ALK, STRN-ALK double-fusion variant in a patient with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. The patient responded well to alectinib (600 mg) twice daily. This case shows a promising treatment option for patients with rare ALK double-fusion variants.

scholarly journals Frequency of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Among Patients With High- or Intermediate-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Complete Remission

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (31) ◽  
pp. 3883-3888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raya Mawad ◽  
Ted A. Gooley ◽  
Vicky Sandhu ◽  
Jack Lionberger ◽  
Bart Scott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Early Relapse ◽  
First Complete Remission ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose To determine the frequency of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1). Patients and Methods Between January 1, 2008, and March 1, 2011, 212 newly diagnosed patients with AML received treatment at our center. Ninety-five patients age less than 75 years with intermediate- or high-risk AML achieved a complete remission, and 21 patients achieved a morphologic remission with incomplete blood count recovery. Results Seventy-eight (67%; 95% CI, 58% to 76%) of 116 patients received HCT at a median of 2.8 months (range, 0.5 to 19 months) from their CR1 date. The median age was 57 years in both the HCT patient group (range, 18 to 75 years) and the non-HCT patient group (range, 24 to 70 years; P = .514). Between the HCT patients and the non-HCT patients, the mean Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 1.1 compared with 1.5, respectively (P = .005), and the average HCT comorbidity score within 60 days of CR1 was 1.7 and 2.1, respectively (P = .68). Twenty-nine (76%) of 38 non-HCT patients were HLA typed, and matched donors were found for 13 of these 29 patients (34% of all non-HCT patients). The most common causes for patients not receiving transplantation in CR1 were early relapse (within 6 months) in 12 patients (32%), poor performance status in eight patients (21%), and physician decision in five patients (13%). Conclusion HCT can be performed in CR1 in the majority of patients with AML for whom it is currently recommended. The main barriers to HCT were early relapse and poor performance status, highlighting the need for improved therapies for patients with AML of all ages.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document