scholarly journals Frequency-doubling technology perimetry and multifocal visual evoked potential in glaucoma, suspected glaucoma, and control patients

2014 ◽  
pp. 1323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Kanadani ◽  
Paulo Mello ◽  
Syril Dorairaj ◽  
Tereza Cristina Kanadani
Keyword(s):  
Visual Evoked Potential ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Frequency Doubling ◽  
Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential ◽  
Frequency Doubling Technology ◽  
And Control ◽  
Visual Evoked

scholarly journals Effects of acutely lowering intraocular pressure on the results of multifocal visual evoked potential testing

2011 ◽  
Vol 89 (7) ◽  
pp. e550-e554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjana P. Jindal ◽  
David Fleischman ◽  
Ben Leiby ◽  
George L. Spaeth ◽  
Jonathan S. Myers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Visual Evoked Potential ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential ◽  
Visual Evoked

Multifocal visual evoked potential evaluation for diagnosis of acute optic neuritis and for prediction of visual outcome and ganglion cell layer thinning following optic neuritis

2020 ◽  
pp. 135245852097573
Author(s):  
Gorm Pihl-Jensen ◽  
Benedikte Wanscher ◽  
Jette Lautrup Frederiksen
Keyword(s):  
Optic Neuritis ◽  
Ganglion Cell ◽  
Visual Function ◽  
Visual Evoked Potential ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Conduction Block ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential ◽  
Visual Evoked

Background:: While damage to the optic nerve following optic neuritis (ON) is readily quantifiable, the evaluation of prognosis for visual function and neuroaxonal loss in the acute ON is challenging. Objective:: The objective of this study is to investigate the value of multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) in acute ON, diagnostically for acute ON and prognostically for visual outcome and subsequent ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer thickness (GCLIPLt). Methods:: A prospective cohort study of mfVEP and full-field visual evoked potential (ffVEP) in acute, unilateral ON (onset < 31 days) was conducted. Comparisons with healthy controls ( n = 30) and association analysis with follow-up optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements (of the GCLIPLt) and visual function (Sloan low-contrast visual acuity (LCVA)) were conducted. Results:: Seventy-nine ON patients were included (mean: 17 days from onset). Excluding measurements with conduction block, ffVEP ( n = 54) and mfVEP ( n = 44) showed sensitivities of 89% and 84% to a specificity of 97%. 65/79 patients were re-examined (mean: 200 days follow-up). mfVEP amplitude and latency inter-eye asymmetry in acute ON correlated with GCLIPLt ( r = 0.587 and Spearman’s ρ = 0.597, for both, p < 0.001). mfVEP amplitude correlated with LCVA inter-eye asymmetry at follow-up ( r = 0.421, p < 0.001), mfVEP latency did not. Conclusion: mfVEP may support the prognostic evaluation of acute ON patients and prove valuable in future neuroprotective and remyelinating trials. In acute ON, the increase in diagnostic value of mfVEP to ffVEP may be limited due to widespread conduction block.

Improving the quality of multifocal visual evoked potential results by calculating multiple virtual channels

2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 396-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Babac A. E. Mazinani ◽  
Till D. Waberski ◽  
Andreas W. A. Weinberger ◽  
Peter Walter ◽  
Gernot F. Roessler
Keyword(s):  
Visual Evoked Potential ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential ◽  
Virtual Channels ◽  
Visual Evoked

scholarly journals The multifocal visual evoked potential: An objective measure of visual fields?

2005 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
pp. 1155-1163 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Seiple ◽  
Karen Holopigian ◽  
Colleen Clemens ◽  
Vivienne C. Greenstein ◽  
Donald C. Hood
Keyword(s):  
Visual Evoked Potential ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Visual Fields ◽  
Objective Measure ◽  
Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential ◽  
Visual Evoked
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document