scholarly journals Comparing Effectiveness of Three Different Anti-VEGF Treatment Regimens for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Two Years’ Real-World Clinical Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 15 ◽  
pp. 1703-1713
Author(s):  
Faye Horner ◽  
Peck Lin Lip ◽  
Bashar R Mohammed ◽  
William Fusi-Rubiano ◽  
Eesha Gokhale ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Gun Park ◽  
Hyun Wook Rhu ◽  
Seungbum Kang ◽  
Young Jung Roh

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of visual loss in older population. Angiogenesis is an important factor associated with the development of CNV due to AMD. Treatment of CNV with intravitreal anti-VEGF monotherapy is currently the standard of care. However, not all patients respond to monotherapy, and modified anti-VEGF treatment regimen and combination therapy may target reducing treatment frequency or improving visual outcome. This paper reviews the many clinical trials that have been performed utilizing several treatment regimens. While many trials have shown that this variable therapy is justifiable, further study is required to determine correct regimens and dosage.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. e0254569
Author(s):  
Igor Kozak ◽  
Avinash Gurbaxani ◽  
Ammar Safar ◽  
Prasan Rao ◽  
Amal Masalmeh ◽  
...  

Objectives To characterize the pattern of approved anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatments among patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME) in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Method This was a retrospective, nonrandomized, observational cohort analysis of the Dubai Real-world Claims Database with a 360-day follow-up period. Adult patients diagnosed with nAMD or DME treated with ranibizumab or aflibercept for the first time were included. The primary objective was to evaluate anti-VEGF treatment patterns with respect to the proportion of patients receiving ranibizumab and aflibercept for nAMD and DME separately. Results Of the 451 patients included in the final study cohort, 83.6% and 16.4% had a diagnosis of DME (ranibizumab: 48.5%; aflibercept: 51.5%) and nAMD (ranibizumab: 40.5%; aflibercept: 59.5%), respectively, at baseline. Treatment frequency of ranibizumab/aflibercept was similar for nAMD (mean: 2.4/2.9 injections; p = 0.2389) with fewer injections in the ranibizumab cohort for DME (mean: 1.9/2.5 injections; p = 0.0002). Most patients received ≤3 anti-VEGF injections during the 360-day follow-up period. The time between consecutive treatments was large (nAMD: 73.6 days/10.5 weeks; DME: 80.5 days/11.5 weeks). Approximately 10%–13.5% of patients switched their anti-VEGF therapy. Most patients (83.8%) had a diabetes diagnosis during the follow-up period. Conclusions This real-world study provides an initial understanding of anti-VEGF treatment patterns in patients with nAMD and DME in the UAE. Treatment frequency of the 2 anti-VEGF agents assessed was similar in both patient populations. Both treatments were infrequently administered with large dosing intervals.


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 212
Author(s):  
Saadet Gültekin Irgat ◽  
Safiye Yiğit Dıvarcı ◽  
Mustafa Doğan ◽  
Fatih Özçura

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-33
Author(s):  
Sergey Yu. Astakhov ◽  
Svyatoslav L. Plavinskii

The issues of endpoints selection for regulatory requirements and real-world clinical practice using the example of anti-VEGF therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) are discussed in the article. New technologies (optical coherent tomography) introduction are shown to change clinical practice but not regulatory requirements on the endpoints. In the same time for regulatory purpose clinical trials design is changed from superiority to non-inferiority. The changes in the approach to primary endpoint selection are not anticipated due to regulators conservatism but there is a requirement to the comparison with best treatment alternative (i.e. same class comparator in case of anti-VEGF therapy) due to ethical reasons. To satisfy real-world clinicians need, the secondary endpoints are analyzed, but multiple testing problem appears. Statistical methods developed in recent years allow using specified comparison to be made without inflating Type I error. HAWK and HARRIER clinical trials demonstrated an example how superiority of brolucizumab over aflibercet on anatomical endpoints was reliably found.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document