scholarly journals Challenges to detect glaucomatous visual field loss with pupil perimetry [Corrigendum]

2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 1749-1750
Author(s):  
Ken Asakawa ◽  
Nobuyuki Shoji
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual Field Loss ◽  
Pupil Perimetry

scholarly journals Pupil Perimetry in the Diagnosis of Functional Visual Field Loss

2002 ◽  
Vol 95 (10) ◽  
pp. 498-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
M S Rajan ◽  
F D Bremner ◽  
P Riordan-Eva
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual Loss ◽  
Light Stimulus ◽  
Visual Field Loss ◽  
Stimulus Size ◽  
Visual Performance ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Objective Evidence ◽  
Pupil Perimetry

The diagnosis of functional visual loss—reduced visual performance in the absence of an organic cause—is usually made by exclusion. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate pupil perimetry in three patients (aged 14, 43 and 50) with visual field loss presumed to be functional on clinical grounds and having no cause identified by visual electro-physiology or magnetic resonance imaging. A modified automated perimeter was used to examine visual and pupil responses to a light stimulus (size 1.7°) presented at five locations in the visual field (fixation and in each of the four quadrants). In each patient, the pupil responses were normal in those test quadrants which showed apparent visual field loss. Pupil perimetry provides objective evidence for a diagnosis of functional visual field loss in selected patients and may circumvent the need for other investigations.

scholarly journals Pupil perimetry in the diagnosis of functional visual field loss

2002 ◽  
Vol 95 (10) ◽  
pp. 498-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
M S Rajan ◽  
F D Bremner ◽  
P Riordan-Eva
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual Field Loss ◽  
Pupil Perimetry

scholarly journals Challenges to detect glaucomatous visual field loss with pupil perimetry

2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 1621-1625
Author(s):  
Ken Asakawa ◽  
Nobuyuki Shoji
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual Field Loss ◽  
Pupil Perimetry

scholarly journals What do patients with glaucoma see: a novel iPad app to improve glaucoma patient awareness of visual field loss

2020 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2020-317034
Author(s):  
Meghal Gagrani ◽  
Jideofor Ndulue ◽  
David Anderson ◽  
Sachin Kedar ◽  
Vikas Gulati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Vision Loss ◽  
Peripheral Vision ◽  
Glaucoma Patient ◽  
Visual Field Loss ◽  
Sensitivity Threshold ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Ipad App ◽  
Field Defects

PurposeGlaucoma patients with peripheral vision loss have in the past subjectively described their field loss as ‘blurred’ or ‘no vision compromise’. We developed an iPad app for patients to self-characterise perception within areas of glaucomatous visual field loss.MethodsTwelve glaucoma patients with visual acuity ≥20/40 in each eye, stable and reliable Humphrey Visual Field (HVF) over 2 years were enrolled. An iPad app (held at 33 cm) allowed subjects to modify ‘blur’ or ‘dimness’ to match their perception of a 2×2 m wall-mounted poster at 1 m distance. Subjects fixated at the centre of the poster (spanning 45° of field from centre). The output was degree of blur/dim: normal, mild and severe noted on the iPad image at the 54 retinal loci tested by the HVF 24-2 and was compared to threshold sensitivity values at these loci. Monocular (Right eye (OD), left eye (OS)) HVF responses were used to calculate an integrated binocular (OU) visual field index (VFI). All three data sets were analysed separately.Results36 HVF and iPad responses from 12 subjects (mean age 71±8.2y) were analysed. The mean VFI was 77% OD, 76% OS, 83% OU. The most common iPad response reported was normal followed by blur. No subject reported dim response. The mean HVF sensitivity threshold was significantly associated with the iPad response at the corresponding retinal loci (For OD, OS and OU, respectively (dB): normal: 23, 25, 27; mild blur: 18, 16, 22; severe blur: 9, 9, 11). On receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the HVF retinal sensitivity cut-off at which subjects reported blur was 23.4 OD, 23 OS and 23.3 OU (dB).ConclusionsGlaucoma subjects self-pictorialised their field defects as blur; never dim or black. Our innovation allows translation of HVF data to quantitatively characterise visual perception in patients with glaucomatous field defects.

Long-term visual outcome after microsurgical removal of occipital lobe cavernomas

2012 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juri Kivelev ◽  
Elina Koskela ◽  
Kirsi Setälä ◽  
Mika Niemelä ◽  
Juha Hernesniemi
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual Fields ◽  
Visual Field Loss ◽  
Occipital Lobe ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Visual Field Deficit

Object Cavernomas in the occipital lobe are relatively rare. Because of the proximity to the visual cortex and incoming subcortical tracts, microsurgical removal of occipital cavernomas may be associated with a risk of visual field defects. The goal of the study was to analyze long-term outcome after operative treatment of occipital cavernomas with special emphasis on visual outcome. Methods Of the 390 consecutive patients with cavernomas who were treated at Helsinki University Central Hospital between 1980 and 2011, 19 (5%) had occipital cavernomas. Sixteen patients (4%) were surgically treated and are included in this study. The median age was 39 years (range 3–59 years). Seven patients (56%) suffered from hemorrhage preoperatively, 5 (31%) presented with visual field deficits, 11 (69%) suffered from seizures, and 4 (25%) had multiple cavernomas. Surgery was indicated for progressive neurological deterioration. The median follow-up after surgery was 5.25 years (range 0.5–14 years). Results All patients underwent thorough neuroophthalmological assessment to determine visual outcome after surgery. Visual fields were classified as normal, mild homonymous visual field loss (not disturbing the patient, driving allowed), moderate homonymous visual field loss (disturbing the patient, driving prohibited), and severe visual field loss (total homonymous hemianopia or total homonymous quadrantanopia). At the last follow-up, 4 patients (25%) had normal visual fields, 6 (38%) had a mild visual field deficit, 1 (6%) complained of moderate visual field impairment, and 5 (31%) had severe homonymous visual field loss. Cavernomas seated deeper than 2 cm from the pial surface carried a 4.4-fold risk of postoperative visual field deficit relative to superficial ones (p = 0.034). Six (55%) of the 11 patients presenting with seizures were seizure-free postoperatively. Eleven (69%) of 16 patients had no disability during the long-term follow-up. Conclusions Surgical removal of occipital cavernomas may carry a significant risk of postoperative visual field deficit, and the risk is even higher for deeper lesions. Seizure outcome after removal of these cavernomas appeared to be worse than that after removal in other supratentorial locations. This should be taken into account during preoperative planning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document