scholarly journals Evaluation of femtosecond laser in flap and cap creation in corneal refractive surgery for myopia: a 3-year follow-up

2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 935-942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Nagy Elmohamady ◽  
Walid Abdelghaffar ◽  
Ahmed Daifalla ◽  
Tamer Salem
Keyword(s):  
Femtosecond Laser ◽  
Refractive Surgery ◽  
Corneal Refractive Surgery

Femtosecond Laser Technology in Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Review

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 912-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
George D. Kymionis ◽  
Vardhaman P. Kankariya ◽  
Argyro D. Plaka ◽  
Dan Z. Reinstein
Keyword(s):  
Femtosecond Laser ◽  
Refractive Surgery ◽  
Laser Technology ◽  
Corneal Refractive Surgery

Femtosecond laser corneal refractive surgery

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ron M. Kurtz ◽  
Greg J. R. Spooner ◽  
Karin R. Sletten ◽  
Kimberly G. Yen ◽  
Samir I. Sayegh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femtosecond Laser ◽  
Refractive Surgery ◽  
Corneal Refractive Surgery

scholarly journals Hypersensitivity reactions after femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction: a case report of corneal infiltrates

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaonan Ma ◽  
Lin Zhang ◽  
Mengdi Li ◽  
Yan Wang
Keyword(s):  
Femtosecond Laser ◽  
Refractive Surgery ◽  
Contact Lenses ◽  
Immunoglobulin E ◽  
Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Corneal Scarring ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
History Of ◽  
Corneal Refractive Surgery ◽  
Corneal Infiltrates

Abstract Background Femtosecond laser corneal refractive surgery is generally considered safe and effective; however, this procedure is rarely associated with severe allergic reactions. We reported a rare case of hypersensitivity reactions which caused bilateral peripheral corneal infiltrates after femtosecond laser small incision lenticule (SMILE) surgery in a man with a history of fruits allergy. Case presentation Here we report the case of a young man who developed white, ring-shaped bilateral peripheral infiltrates that appeared 1 day after an uneventful SMILE surgery. The overlying corneal epithelium was intact; the infiltrate was negative for bacterial culture, but high titers of immunoglobulin E was demonstrated in the blood. Symptomatically, a clinical diagnosis of sterile corneal infiltrates was made, and the patient was treated with topical and systemic steroids. The infiltrates were immunogenic in origin, which may be caused by the contact lenses used for suction duration in surgery. It resolved without corneal scarring in the subsequent months following steroid treatment. The patient’s visual acuity improved. Conclusions When patients with a history of allergy who aim to perform corneal refractive surgery, surgeons must consider possible hypersensitivity reactions after treatment. More studies are needed to clarify the relationship between contact glass used in femtosecond laser corneal refractive surgery and IgE mediated hypersensitivity reactions.

New developments in corneal refractive surgery with femtosecond laser pulses

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronan Le Harzic ◽  
Sven Martin ◽  
Rainer Bückle ◽  
Christian Wüllner ◽  
Christof Donitzky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femtosecond Laser ◽  
Refractive Surgery ◽  
Laser Pulses ◽  
Femtosecond Laser Pulses ◽  
New Developments ◽  
Corneal Refractive Surgery

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of the Visual and Refractive Outcomes Following SMILE, FS-LASIK, and T-PRK Surgery: A Retrospective, Non-Blinded Clinical Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junjie PIAO ◽  
Ying Li
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Study ◽  
Femtosecond Laser ◽  
Refractive Surgery ◽  
Laser System ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Refractive Outcomes ◽  
Superior Efficacy ◽  
Department Of Ophthalmology ◽  
Corneal Refractive Surgery ◽  
Efficacy Index

Abstract Background: To comparatively evaluate of the visual and refractive outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK) surgery.Methods: This was a retrospective, case-series, non-blinded clinical study. Consecutive eligible patients underwent SMILE, FS-LASIK, and T-PRK at the Department of Ophthalmology of Peking Union Medical Hospital, a tertiary referral center. All myopic patients were treated with corneal refractive surgery (SMILE, FS-LASIK, and T-PRK) using the VisuMax (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) 500-kHz femtosecond laser system and the Amaris 750S excimer laser platform (SCHWIND eye-tech solutions, Kleinostheim, Germany). Visual and topographic astigmatism changes at 6 months were the main outcome measure. Secondary outcomes were the efficacy index at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.Results: We recruited 75 consecutive patients (mean age, 27.88 ± 5.76 years; 68% women; all Asian) with no significant differences between groups in terms of preoperative demographic data, except in preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) (-5.54 ± 1.86 D, -5.64 ± 1.66 D, and -3.78 ± 1.30 D, respectively; P<0.001), astigmatism (1.24 ± 1.62 D, 1.16 ± 0.75 D, and 0.72 ± 0.42 D, respectively; P=0.008), and residual bed thickness (313.08 ± 32.18 μm, 427.59 ± 30.69 μm, and 427.09 ± 41.07 μm, respectively; P<0.001). A superior efficacy index was shown in SMILE and FS-LASIK compared to T-PRK 1 month after surgery.Conclusions: The results from this retrospective, non-blind, case-series clinical study suggest that all of the corneal refractive surgery options are safe and effective. However, while SMILE and FS-LASIK procedures have equal visual outcomes, they have superior efficacy index values in the early postsurgical period.

VisuMax®femtosecond laser for corneal refractive surgery

2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 385-388
Author(s):  
Robert Montés-Micó ◽  
Alejandro Cerviño ◽  
Teresa Ferrer-Blasco
Keyword(s):  
Femtosecond Laser ◽  
Refractive Surgery ◽  
Corneal Refractive Surgery

scholarly journals Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery After Corneal Refractive Surgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyunmin Ahn ◽  
Ikhyun Jun ◽  
Kyoung Yul Seo ◽  
Eung Kweon Kim ◽  
Tae-im Kim
Keyword(s):  
Femtosecond Laser ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Refractive Surgery ◽  
Previous History ◽  
Refractive Outcomes ◽  
Ocular Residual Astigmatism ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Safety Outcomes ◽  
History Of ◽  
Corneal Refractive Surgery

Abstract Cataract is the leading cause of blindness worldwide, and advanced cataract techniques such as femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) have been commercially available. Corneal refractive surgery (CRS) is one of the most popular surgeries for the correction of refractive errors. CRS changes the cornea not only anatomically but also pathophysiologically. However, there has been no clinical research analyzing the refractive and safety outcomes of FLACS after CRS. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether FLACS after CRS is more effective and safe than conventional PCS. Participants with a previous CRS history who underwent FLACS or conventional PCS were included in this study. The visual outcomes and the refractive outcomes including refractive, corneal, and ocular residual astigmatism were compared. The safety outcomes were then studied intraoperatively and postoperatively. A total of 102 patients with age-related cataract were enrolled. At 3 months postoperatively, UCVA, BCVA, and predictive error were not significantly different between the FLACS and conventional PCS groups. Reduction of refractive astigmatism was higher in FLACS. Postoperative ORA was significant lower in FLACS. Reduction of ORA was higher in FLACS. The intraoperative and postoperative complications were also not significantly different between the two groups. FLACS was found to be effective in patients with a previous history of CRS in terms of vision and refractive outcomes and was free from adverse effects. The competitive edge of FLACS in postoperative ORA, with the reduction of refractive astigmatism and ORA, may provide better visual quality than conventional PCS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document