scholarly journals Current Use, Perceived Barriers, and Learning Preference of Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in the Emergency Medicine in Qatar – A Mixed Design

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 177-182
Author(s):  
Khalid Bashir ◽  
Aftab Mohammad Azad ◽  
Ayman Hereiz ◽  
Mohammed Talha Bashir ◽  
Maarij Masood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Perceived Barriers ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Mixed Design ◽  
Learning Preference

scholarly journals Use of a Refresher Course Increases Confidence in Point-of-Care Ultrasound Skills in Emergency Medicine Faculty

Cureus ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madeline Schwid ◽  
Owen Harris ◽  
Adaira Landry ◽  
Andrew Eyre ◽  
Patricia Henwood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound

Perception of point-of-care ultrasound performed by emergency medicine physicians

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. 408-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Whitney Hansen ◽  
Carl E. Mitchell ◽  
Bikash Bhattarai ◽  
Napatkamon Ayutyanont ◽  
Jeffrey R. Stowell
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound

Barriers to reporting guideline adherence in point-of-care ultrasound research: a cross-sectional survey of authors and journal editors

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjebm-2020-111604
Author(s):  
Ross Prager ◽  
Luke Gagnon ◽  
Joshua Bowdridge ◽  
Rudy R Unni ◽  
Trevor A McGrath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Reporting Quality ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Research Reporting ◽  
Journal Editors

ObjectiveAlthough the literature supporting the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) continues to grow, incomplete reporting of primary diagnostic accuracy studies has previously been identified as a barrier to translating research into practice and to performing unbiased systematic reviews. This study assesses POCUS investigator and journal editor attitudes towards barriers to adhering to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015 guidelines.Design, setting, participantsTwo separate surveys using a 5-point Likert scale were sent to POCUS study investigators and journal editors to assess for knowledge, attitude and behavioural barriers to the complete reporting of POCUS research. Respondents were identified based on a previous study assessing STARD 2015 adherence for POCUS studies published in emergency medicine, anaesthesia and critical care journals. Responses were anonymously linked to STARD 2015 adherence data from the previous study. Written responses were thematically grouped into the following categories: knowledge, attitude and behavioural barriers to quality reporting, or other. Likert response items are reported as median with IQRs.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the median Likert score for the investigator and editor surveys assessing knowledge, attitude and behavioural beliefs about barriers to adhering to the STARD 2015 guidelines.ResultsThe investigator survey response rate was 18/69 (26%) and the editor response rate was 5/21 (24%). Most investigator respondents were emergency medicine practitioners (13/21, 62%). Two-thirds of investigators were aware of the STARD 2015 guidelines (12/18, 67%) and overall agreed that incomplete reporting limits generalisability and the ability to detect risk of bias (median 4 (4, 5)). Investigators felt that the STARD 2015 guidelines were useful, easy to find and easy to use (median 4 (4, 4.25); median 4 (4, 4.25) and median 4 (3, 4), respectively). There was a shared opinion held by investigators and editors that the peer review process be primarily responsible for ensuring complete research reporting (median 4 (3, 4) and median 4 (3.75, 4), respectively). Three of 18 authors (17%) felt that the English publication language of STARD 2015 was a barrier to adherence.ConclusionsAlthough investigators and editors recognise the importance of completely reported research, reporting quality is still a core issue for POCUS research. The shared opinion held by investigators and editors that the peer review process be primarily responsible for reporting quality is potentially problematic; we view completely reported research as an integral part of the research process that investigators are responsible for, with the peer review process serving as another additional layer of quality control. Endorsement of reporting guidelines by journals, auditing reporting guideline adherence during the peer review process and translation of STARD 2015 guidelines into additional languages may improve reporting completeness for the acute POCUS literature.Trial registration numberOpen Science Framework Registry (https://osf.io/5pzxs/).

The abdomen

2019 ◽  
pp. 89-106
Author(s):  
Justin Bowra ◽  
Osama Loubani ◽  
Paul Atkinson
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Bowel Obstruction ◽  
Peritoneal Fluid ◽  
Renal Colic ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Clinical Situation ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Quadrant Pain ◽  
Diagnosis And Management ◽  
Rule Out

Abdominal point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) for intra-peritoneal fluid in trauma is one of the earliest, and now most accepted, uses of PoCUS in emergency medicine and resuscitation. It is an essential part of the e-FAST (Extended Focused Assessment in Trauma) examination. Abdominal PoCUS can also guide diagnosis and management of right upper quadrant pain and renal colic. PoCUS can also ‘rule in’ (but not ‘rule out’) bowel obstruction and appendicitis. Regardless of the clinical situation, PoCUS is used to answer specific binary questions, rather than to perform an exhaustive survey of the abdomen.

scholarly journals 238 Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Morbidity and Mortality Cases in Emergency Medicine

2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. S92
Author(s):  
A. Goldsmith ◽  
H. Shokoohi ◽  
M. Loesche ◽  
N. Duggan ◽  
R. Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound

Credentialing Pediatric Emergency Medicine Faculty in Point-of-Care Ultrasound

2019 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyssa M. Abo ◽  
Kiyetta H. Alade ◽  
Rachel G. Rempell ◽  
David Kessler ◽  
Jason W. Fischer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Pediatric Emergency ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Pediatric Emergency Medicine

scholarly journals Point-of-care Ultrasound in Morbidity and Mortality Cases in Emergency Medicine: Who Benefits the Most?

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Goldsmith ◽  
Hamid Shokoohi ◽  
Michael Loesche ◽  
Ravish Patel ◽  
Heidi Kimberly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document