scholarly journals Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of CRAFFT Substance Abuse Screening Test among adolescents

2015 ◽  
pp. 1505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasan Kandemir ◽  
Ömer Aydemir ◽  
Suat Ekinci ◽  
Salih Selek ◽  
Sultan Basmacı Kandemir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Substance Abuse ◽  
Screening Test ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Turkish Version ◽  
Substance Abuse Screening

Validity of the ‘crafft‘ substance abuse screening test among general adolescent clinic outpatients

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 97 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R Knight ◽  
Lon Sherritt ◽  
Lydia A Shrier ◽  
Sion Kim Harris ◽  
Grace Chang
Keyword(s):  
Substance Abuse ◽  
Screening Test ◽  
Adolescent Clinic ◽  
Substance Abuse Screening

scholarly journals Validity of the CRAFFT Substance Abuse Screening Test Among Adolescent Clinic Patients

2002 ◽  
Vol 156 (6) ◽  
pp. 607 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Knight ◽  
Lon Sherritt ◽  
Lydia A. Shrier ◽  
Sion Kim Harris ◽  
Grace Chang
Keyword(s):  
Substance Abuse ◽  
Screening Test ◽  
Adolescent Clinic ◽  
Substance Abuse Screening

Identifying young adult substance abusers: the Rutgers Collegiate Substance Abuse Screening Test.

1993 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 522-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
M E Bennett ◽  
B S McCrady ◽  
W Frankenstein ◽  
L A Laitman ◽  
D H Van Horn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Substance Abuse ◽  
Young Adult ◽  
Screening Test ◽  
Substance Abusers ◽  
Substance Abuse Screening

Substance-Abuse Screening in Mental Health

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loretta L. Ransom ◽  
Suzanne Spear ◽  
Shaquita Tilman ◽  
Colby Moss ◽  
Elizabeth Gong-Guy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Substance Abuse ◽  
Substance Abuse Screening

Turkish Adaptation of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale–Short Form

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
İsmail Toygar ◽  
Sadık Hançerlioğlu ◽  
Selden Gül ◽  
Tülün Utku ◽  
Ilgın Yıldırım Şimşir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Short Form ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Turkish Version ◽  
Patient Identification ◽  
Validity Index ◽  
Content Validity Index

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Diabetic Foot Scale–Short Form (DFS-SF). The study was cross-sectional and conducted between January and October 2019 in a diabetic foot council of a university hospital. A total of 194 diabetic foot patients participated in the study. A Patient Identification Form and DFS-SF were used for data collection. Forward and backward translations were used in language validity. Expert opinions were obtained to determine the Content Validity Index. To determine construct validity, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used. Cronbach’s α internal consistency coefficient, item-scale correlation, and test-retest reliability were used to evaluate reliability. It was found that Content Validity Index was 0.97 (0.86-1.00), the factor loading of scale varied from 0.378 to 0.982, Cronbach’s α value varied from 0.81 to 0.94, and item-total correlations were between 0.30 and 0.75. The Turkish version of the DFS-SF was found valid and reliable to measure the quality of life of diabetic foot patients.

Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Patient Dignity Inventory

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Yasemin Eskigülek ◽  
Sultan Kav
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Turkish Version ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Fit Index ◽  
Turkish Society

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) in the Turkish society, which was developed to evaluate dignity-related distress in palliative care patients. Methods One hundred and twenty-seven adults with advanced cancer hospitalized in several clinics of two university hospitals were included in the study. The patients whose Palliative Performance Scale score was at least 40% were recruited to study. The data were collected with a patient demographic form, the Turkish version of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-TR), and the Turkish version of the PDI (PDI-TR). The PDI-TR was finalized and back-translated after translating into Turkish and obtaining 10 expert opinions. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency, concurrent validity, and test–retest reliability analysis were performed. Results The Cronbach's α coefficient of PDI-TR was 0.94. Factor analysis resulted in a five-factor solution, and all items were loaded on factors. Factors were labeled as symptom distress, existential distress, self-confidence, dependency, and supportive care needs and accounted for 68.70% of the overall variance. The model's normed fit index, comparative fit index, and X2/SD were found between acceptable range (0.90, 0.93, and 2.64, respectively). A positive and strong correlation was found between subdimension scores of HADS-TR and the total score of PDI-TR (r = 0.70 for anxiety subdimension; r = 0.73 for depression subdimension). The test–retest reliability was conducted with 32 patients within the sample two weeks after the first application, and no significant difference was found between the two application scores as the result of paired-sample t-test (p > 0.05). An intraclass correlation coefficient of test–retest reliability was r = 0.855. Significance of results PDI-TR was found to be a valid and reliable tool in palliative care patients in Turkish society.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document