scholarly journals Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of the Hoarding Rating Scale-Self-Report (HRS-SR-J)

2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 1235-1243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aki Tsuchiyagaito ◽  
Satoshi Horiuchi ◽  
Toko Igarashi ◽  
Yoshiya Kawanori ◽  
Yoshiyuki Hirano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Structure Reliability

scholarly journals Factor structure, reliability and validity of a Japanese version of the stress mindset measure

2017 ◽  
Vol 81 (0) ◽  
pp. 3C-029-3C-029
Author(s):  
Kenichiro Yoneda ◽  
Akira Tsuda ◽  
Satoshi Horiuchi ◽  
Ayumi Fusejima ◽  
Kengo Mihara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Structure Reliability

scholarly journals Preliminary Analysis of the Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity of an Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Screening Tool for Use with Adults in Malaysia

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (23) ◽  
pp. 4763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Normah Che Din ◽  
Liana Mohd Nawi ◽  
Shazli Ezzat Ghazali ◽  
Mahadir Ahmad ◽  
Norhayati Ibrahim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Obsessive Compulsive Disorder ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
High Reliability ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Obsessive Compulsive ◽  
Compulsive Disorder ◽  
Structure Reliability

This is a preliminary study to examine the factor structure, reliability, and validity of an obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) screening tool for use in the Malaysian setting. A total of 199 Malaysian adults were recruited for this study. After cleaning and normalizing the data, 190 samples were left to be analyzed. Principle component analysis using varimax rotation was then performed to examine various factors derived from psychometric tools commonly used to assess OCD patients. The screening tool exhibited three factors that fit the description of obsessions and compulsions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders—5th Edition (DSM 5), as well as other common symptoms that co-morbid with OCD. The labels given to the three factors were: Severity of Compulsions, Severity of Obsessions, and Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety. Reliability analysis showed high reliability with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.94, whereas convergent validity of the tool with the Yale Brown Obsessive-compulsive Scale—Self Report demonstrated good validity of r = 0.829. The three-factor model explained 68.91% of the total variance. Subsequent studies should focus on OCD factors that are culturally unique in the Malaysian context. Future research may also use online technology, which is cost-efficient and accessible, to further enhance the screening tool.

Development of a Japanese Version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule for Children

2006 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 535-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuyuki Yamasaki ◽  
Risa Katsuma ◽  
Akiko Sakai
Keyword(s):  
Negative Affect ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Positive And Negative Affect ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Two Factors ◽  
Promax Rotation

In this paper, the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule for Children originally developed in 1999 by Laurent, et al. was adapted for use in Japan. In Study 1, a total of 763 children in Grades 4 to 6 completed this Schedule, and 103 of them completed it again about three months later. Principal factor analysis with promax rotation identified two factors, positive and negative affect, in the Japanese version, whose alphas (over .80) and test-retest correlations (over .50) were sufficient to indicate internal consistency and stability over time. In Study 2, a total of 328 children completed the Japanese version, the Depression Self-rating Scale for Children, and the Trait Form of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children. Intercorrelations showed convergent and discriminant validity using these self-report measures of depression and anxiety. Overall these data support the reliability and validity of this Japanese version.

Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Therapist Response Questionnaire.

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annalisa Tanzilli ◽  
Antonello Colli ◽  
Franco Del Corno ◽  
Vittorio Lingiardi
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Structure Reliability ◽  
Therapist Response
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document