scholarly journals A Novel, Easy-to-Use Staple Line Reinforcement for Surgical Staplers

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 23-29
Author(s):  
Jordan B Wong ◽  
Dwight D Henninger ◽  
Jeffrey W Clymer ◽  
Crystal D Ricketts ◽  
Raymond S Fryrear II
Keyword(s):  
Staple Line ◽  
Surgical Staplers ◽  
Staple Line Reinforcement

scholarly journals Staple-line reinforcement using barbed sutures in 1008 sleeve gastrectomies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Görkem Özgen ◽  
İsmail Çalıkoğlu ◽  
Bülent Acunaş ◽  
Mehmet Ali Yerdel
Keyword(s):  
Staple Line ◽  
Staple Line Reinforcement ◽  
Barbed Sutures

scholarly journals Short-Term Outcomes of Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: Does Staple Line Reinforcement Matter?

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 1109-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ertugrul Kemal Durmush ◽  
Goktug Ermerak ◽  
Deniz Durmush
Keyword(s):  
Morbid Obesity ◽  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Staple Line ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Staple Line Reinforcement

Cost effectiveness of Staple Line Reinforcement in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Highet ◽  
Emily Hazel Johnson ◽  
Aaron J. Bonham ◽  
David W. Hutton ◽  
Shuhao Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Staple Line ◽  
Staple Line Reinforcement

Meta-analysis of Bioabsorbable Staple Line Reinforcement and Risk of Fistula Following Pancreatic Resection

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric H. Jensen ◽  
Pamela R. Portschy ◽  
Jessica Chowaniec ◽  
Ming Teng
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Resection ◽  
Staple Line ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Staple Line Reinforcement

Risk Factors for Pancreatic Fistula after Stapled Gland Transection

2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (8) ◽  
pp. 965-970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Preeti D. Subhedar ◽  
Sameer H. Patel ◽  
Peter J. Kneuertz ◽  
Shishir K. Maithel ◽  
Charles A. Staley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Pancreatic Fistula ◽  
Staple Line ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Fistula Formation ◽  
Staple Line Reinforcement ◽  
Mesh Reinforcement ◽  
Included Patient ◽  
Pancreatic Transection ◽  
Clinically Significant

The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for pancreatic fistula (PF) after stapled transection in distal pancreatectomy (DP). Patients undergoing DP using a stapler for transection between 2005 and 2009 were identified from a pancreatic resection database. Variables examined included patient and tumor characteristics, staple size, and the use of mesh reinforcement. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for postoperative PF. One hundred forty-nine had stapled transection, and of these, 25 (17%) had mesh reinforcement. The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 28 per cent and less than 1 per cent; 34 (23%) were diabetic. The rate of clinically significant PF was 14 per cent. On univariate analysis, diabetes ( P = 0.04), a firm pancreas ( P = 0.03), use of mesh staple line reinforcement ( P = 0.02), use of a 4.1-mm staple cartridge ( P = 0.01), and blood loss greater than 100 mL ( P = 0.01) were associated with higher pancreatic fistula rates. On multivariate analysis, only the presence of diabetes (OR, 4.17; 95% CI, 1.1-15.3; P = 0.03) and the use of a 4.1-mm cartridge (OR, 8.57; 95% CI, 1.2-60.2; P = 0.03) were independently associated with pancreatic fistula formation. Stapled pancreatic transection provides an acceptable PF rate after DP. Diabetes and staple size influence PF rates. In our experience, use of mesh staple line reinforcement did not reduce the incidence of PF after stapled transection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document