scholarly journals Effect of Additional Pain Neuroscience Education in Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy on Current Pain. A Non-Randomized, Controlled Intervention Study

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 2947-2957
Author(s):  
Michael Richter ◽  
Christian Rauscher ◽  
Alexander Kluttig ◽  
Joachim Mallwitz ◽  
Karl-Stefan Delank
Keyword(s):  
Pain Therapy ◽  
Intervention Study ◽  
Multimodal Pain Therapy ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Neuroscience Education ◽  
Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy

Longitudinal resting-state electroencephalography in chronic pain patients undergoing interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy

Pain ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrik Heitmann ◽  
Cristina Gil Ávila ◽  
Moritz M. Nickel ◽  
Son Ta Dinh ◽  
Elisabeth S. May ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Resting State ◽  
Pain Therapy ◽  
Multimodal Pain Therapy ◽  
Chronic Pain Patients ◽  
Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy ◽  
Pain Patients

scholarly journals Impact of treatment dose on patient outcomes after Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Baumbach ◽  
Maria Richter ◽  
Johannes Schneider ◽  
Ulrich Christian Smolenski ◽  
Thomas Weiss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Pain Therapy ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Multimodal Pain Therapy ◽  
Average Pain Intensity ◽  
Average Pain ◽  
Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Objectives The impact of duration and intensity on outcomes after Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy (IMPT) is poorly researched. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of low dose (LD, avg. 25 hours) and high dose IMPT (HD, avg. 110 hours).Methods Patients completed pain-related questionnaires at the beginning (T1), at the end of therapy (T2) and at 3-month follow-up (T3) and were matched according to age, sex, presence of back-pain and pain-related disability at T1, resulting in 32 patients per group. Primary endpoint was the difference in pain-related disability and average pain intensity at T3 between both groups. In addition, early treatment effects and group differences at T2 were analyzed.Results Both groups showed significant improvements in pain-related disability and average pain intensity between T1 and T2. These positive effects persisted in the HD group until the 3-month follow-up, whereas outcomes in the LD group patients deteriorated and were significantly poorer compared to HD at T3.Discussion Within a widely comparable therapeutic setting, high-dose IMPT was associated with longer lasting improvements compared to low-dose IMPT in chronic pain patients, indicating that the “dose” of therapy is a relevant factor for clinical outcomes and should be further investigated.

scholarly journals Developing a core outcome domain set to assessing effectiveness of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy

Pain ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 159 (4) ◽  
pp. 673-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrike Kaiser ◽  
Christian Kopkow ◽  
Stefanie Deckert ◽  
Katrin Neustadt ◽  
Lena Jacobi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Therapy ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
Multimodal Pain Therapy ◽  
Outcome Domain ◽  
Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy

scholarly journals Effect of a Multidomain Lifestyle Intervention on Estimated Dementia Risk

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Alina Solomon ◽  
Ron Handels ◽  
Anders Wimo ◽  
Riitta Antikainen ◽  
Tiina Laatikainen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lifestyle Intervention ◽  
Intervention Study ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Dementia Risk ◽  
Geriatric Intervention ◽  
Prevention Potential ◽  
Post Hoc

We investigated the effect of a multidomain lifestyle intervention on the risk of dementia estimated using the validated CAIDE risk score (post-hoc analysis). The Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER) is a 2-year randomized controlled trial among 1,260 at-risk older adults (60–77 years). Difference in the estimated mean change in CAIDE score at 2 years in the intervention compared to the control group was –0.16 (95 %CI –0.31 to 0.00) (p = 0.013), corresponding to a relative dementia risk reduction between 6.04–6.50%. This could be interpreted as a reflection of the prevention potential of the intervention.

Intravenous Iron Sucrose in Anemic and Non-anemic Iron Deficient Patients with CHF: A Randomized, Controlled, Observer-blinded Intervention Study (FERRIC-HF)

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. S179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan D. Anker ◽  
Darlington O. Okonko ◽  
Agnieszka Grzeslo ◽  
Tomasz Witkowski ◽  
Constantinos G. Missouris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intervention Study ◽  
Intravenous Iron ◽  
Iron Sucrose ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Iron Deficient

Multimodal pain therapy in chronic noncancer pain—gold standard or need for further clarification?

Pain ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 158 (10) ◽  
pp. 1853-1859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrike Kaiser ◽  
Rolf-Detlef Treede ◽  
Rainer Sabatowski
Keyword(s):  
Gold Standard ◽  
Pain Therapy ◽  
Multimodal Pain Therapy ◽  
Chronic Noncancer Pain ◽  
Noncancer Pain
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document