scholarly journals Scoping Review of Off-Label Topical Analgesia in Palliative, Hospice and Cancer Care: Towards Flexibility in Evidence-Based Medicine

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 3003-3009
Author(s):  
Baraa O Tayeb ◽  
Jennifer A Winegarden ◽  
Rawabi A Alashari ◽  
Moudi M Alasmari ◽  
Jonathan Winegarden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Evidence Based Medicine ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Based Medicine ◽  
Topical Analgesia

scholarly journals What are the links between evidence-based medicine and shared decision-making in training programs for junior doctors? A scoping review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. e037225
Author(s):  
Mary Simons ◽  
Frances Rapport ◽  
Yvonne Zurynski ◽  
Jeremy Cullis ◽  
Andrew Davidson
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Evidence Based Medicine ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Junior Doctors ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centred Care ◽  
Based Medicine

IntroductionPatient-centred care is pivotal to clinical practice and medical education. The practice of evidence-based medicine (EBM) and shared decision-making (SDM) are complementary aspects of patient-centred care, but they are frequently taught and reported as independent entities. To effectively perform all steps of EBM, clinicians need to include patients in SDM conversations, however, the uptake of this has been slow and inconsistent. A solution may be the incorporation of SDM into EBM training programmes, but such programmes do not routinely include SDM skills development. This scoping review will survey the literature on the kinds of EBM and SDM educational programmes that exist for recently qualified doctors, programmes that incorporate the teaching of both EBM and SDM skills, as well as identifying research gaps in the literature.Methods and analysisLiterature searches will be conducted in the databases Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library. Bibliographies of key articles and their citing references will also be hand-searched and assessed for inclusion. Selected grey literature will be included. Papers must be written in English, or provide English abstracts, and date from 1996 to the present day.Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts, check full texts of selected papers for eligibility and extract the data. Any disagreement will be resolved, and consensus reached, if necessary, with the assistance of a third reviewer. Qualitative and quantitative studies that address educational interventions for either EBM, SDM or both will be included. Data extraction tables will present bibliographic information, populations, interventions, context and outcomes. Data will be summarised using tables and figures and a description of findings.Ethics and disseminationThis review will synthesise information from publicly available publications and does not require ethics approval. The results will be disseminated via conference presentations and publications in medical journals.

scholarly journals Nudging healthcare professionals towards evidence-based medicine: A systematic scoping review

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosanna Nagtegaal ◽  
Lars Tummers ◽  
Mirko Noordegraaf ◽  
Victor Bekkers
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Evidence Based Medicine ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Information Overload ◽  
Reference Points ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Social Reference ◽  
Based Medicine

Translating medical evidence into practice is difficult. Key challenges in applying evidence-based medicine are information overload and that evidence needs to be used in context by healthcare professionals. Nudging (i.e. softly steering) healthcare professionals towards utilizing evidence-based medicine may be a feasible possibility. This systematic scoping review is the first overview of nudging healthcare professionals in relation to evidence-based medicine. We have investigated a) the distribution of studies on nudging healthcare professionals, b) the nudges tested and behaviors targeted, c) the methodological quality of studies and d) whether the success of nudges is related to context. In terms of distribution, we found a large but scattered field: 100 articles in over 60 different journals, including various types of nudges targeting different behaviors such as hand hygiene or prescribing drugs. Some nudges – especially reminders to deal with information overload – are often applied, while others - such as providing social reference points – are seldom used. The methodological quality is moderate. Success appears to vary in terms of three contextual characteristics: the task, organizational, and occupational contexts. Based on this review, we propose future research directions, particularly related to methods (preregistered research designs to reduce publication bias), nudges (using less-often applied nudges on less studied outcomes), and context (moving beyond one-size-fits-all approaches).

scholarly journals Evidence-based medicine curricula and barriers for physicians in training: a scoping review

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 101-124
Author(s):  
Alexandra Halalau ◽  
Brett Holmes ◽  
Andrea Rogers-Snyr ◽  
Teodora Donisan ◽  
Eric Nielsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Evidence Based Medicine ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Based Medicine

scholarly journals Tranexamsäure und Endoprothetik: zwischen „off label use“ und „evidence-based medicine“

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heiko Lier ◽  
Tobias Kammerer ◽  
Jürgen Knapp ◽  
Stefan Hofer ◽  
Marc Maegele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Evidence Based Medicine ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Off Label Use ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Based Medicine ◽  
Label Use
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document