scholarly journals Effects of antihypertensive drugs on carotid intima-media thickness: Focus on angiotensin II receptor blockers. A review of randomized, controlled trials

2009 ◽  
Vol Volume 2 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesare Cuspidi
Keyword(s):  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Antihypertensive Drugs ◽  
Intima Media Thickness ◽  
Carotid Intima Media Thickness ◽  
Angiotensin Ii Receptor Blockers ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Angiotensin Ii Receptor ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Receptor Blockers

The Impact of Angiotensin-II Receptor Blockers on Cardiovascular Events in Hypertensive Patients – Evidence from Real-life Databases

2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Robert J Petrella ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Antihypertensive Drugs ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Angiotensin Ii Receptor Blockers ◽  
Angiotensin Ii Receptor ◽  
Real World Setting ◽  
Actual Experience ◽  
Receptor Blockers ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
The Impact

It is widely recognised that hypertension is a major risk factor for the development of future cardiovascular (CV) events, which in turn are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Blood pressure (BP) control with antihypertensive drugs has been shown to reduce the risk of CV events. Angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs) are one such class of antihypertensive drugs and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown ARB-based therapies to have effective BP-lowering properties. However, data obtained under these tightly controlled settings do not necessarily reflect actual experience in clinical practice. Real-life databases may offer alternative information that reflects an uncontrolled real-world setting and complements and expands on the findings of clinical trials. Recent analyses of practice-based real-life databases have shown ARB-based therapies to be associated with better persistence and adherence rates and with superior BP control than non-ARB-based therapies. Analyses of real-life databases also suggest that ARB-based therapies may be associated with a lower risk of CV events than other antihypertensive-drug-based therapies.

Abstract 17683: LCZ696 vs. ACEI/ARB for Hypertension: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdulah Alrifai ◽  
shadi Al Halabi ◽  
Robert Chait
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Essential Hypertension ◽  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Angiotensin Ii Receptor ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Introduction: LCZ696 is a first-in-class inhibitor of the angiotensin II receptor and Neprilysin. The use of LCZ696 in Heart Failure is promising compared to ACEI or ARB. The use of LCZ696 for blood pressure has been studied but controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LCZ696 to ACEI/ARB for lowering systolic blood pressure effect. Objectives: To assess the efficacy of LCZ696 on systolic blood pressure in comparison to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/Angiotensin II receptor antagonist (ARB). Methods: We searched PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane for prospective RCTs that compared LCZ696 versus ACEI or ARB in patients with established diagnosis of essential hypertension. Trials that included patients with essential hypertension with or without heart failure were randomized to either LCZ696 or ACEI or ARB, and that also reported at least one of the studied outcomes were included. Study quality was assessed using the Jadad score. Heterogeneity of the studies was analyzed by Cochran’s Q statistics. Mean differences were calculated using the random effect model. Results: Three RCTs met our inclusion criteria and included 8996 patients who had mild-moderate essential hypertension and were between18-75 years. They were randomized to LCZ696 versus ACEI or ARB. The use of LCZ696 was associated with improved systolic blood pressure control when compared to the control group (MD -3.89; 95% CI -7.75, -0.04; P=0.05). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the use of LCZ696 in hypertensive patients provides better reduction of blood pressure when compared to an ACEI or an ARB.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document