scholarly journals Systolic Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Mortality, and All-Cause Mortality in Normoglycemia, Prediabetes, and Diabetes

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 2375-2388
Author(s):  
Chao-Lei Chen ◽  
Lin Liu ◽  
Jia-Yi Huang ◽  
Yu-Ling Yu ◽  
Kenneth Lo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
All Cause Mortality

scholarly journals Blood Pressure Variability and Prognosis in Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Yuliang Zhao ◽  
Letian Yang ◽  
Shaobin Yu ◽  
Stephen Salerno ◽  
Yi Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Coefficient Of Variation ◽  
Blood Pressure Variability ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
The Cochrane Library ◽  
Stratified Analysis

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The prognostic value of blood pressure variability (BPV) in patients receiving hemodialysis is inconclusive. In this study, we aimed to assess the association between BPV and clinical outcomes in the hemodialysis population. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Pubmed/Medline, EMBASE, Ovid, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science databases were searched for relevant articles published until April 1, 2020. Studies on the association between BPV and prognosis in patients receiving hemodialysis were included. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 14 studies (37,976 patients) were included in the analysis. In patients receiving hemodialysis, systolic BPV was associated with higher all-cause (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07–1.19; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) and cardiovascular (HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.10–1.22; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) mortality. In the stratified analysis of systolic BPV, interdialytic systolic BPV, rather than 44-h ambulatory systolic BPV or intradialytic systolic BPV, was identified to be related to both all-cause (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.05–1.17; <i>p</i> = 0.001) and cardiovascular (HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.06–1.22; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) mortality. Among the different BPV metrics, the coefficient of variation of systolic blood pressure was a predictor of both all-cause (<i>p</i> = 0.01) and cardiovascular (<i>p</i> = 0.002) mortality. Although diastolic BPV was associated with all-cause mortality (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.01–1.17; <i>p</i> = 0.02) in patients receiving hemodialysis, it failed to predict cardiovascular mortality (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.52–1.42; <i>p</i> = 0.56). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This meta-analysis revealed that, in patients receiving hemodialysis, interdialytic systolic BPV was associated with both increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Furthermore, the coefficient of variation of systolic blood pressure was identified as a potentially promising metric of BPV in predicting all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. The use of 44-h ambulatory systolic BPV, intradialytic systolic BPV, and metrics of diastolic BPV in the prognosis of the hemodialysis population require further investigation (PROSPERO registry number: CRD42019139215).

Abstract 14652: Systolic Blood Pressure Trajectories and Cardiovascular Outcomes in SPRINT

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles A German ◽  
Tali Elfassy ◽  
Matthew J Singleton ◽  
Carlos J Rodriguez ◽  
Walter T Ambrosius ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Latent Class ◽  
Stable Group ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Average Blood Pressure ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Over Time

Introduction: Blood pressure trajectories have been associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) in observational studies. It is unclear whether these associations are independent of average blood pressure over time. Methods: We used data from SPRINT to identify systolic blood pressure (SBP) trajectories among a cohort of 8901 participants by incorporating SBP measures during the first 12 months of the trial post randomization. Trajectories were identified using latent class based modeling. Study outcomes included incident CVD, defined as myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome not resulting in myocardial infarction, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure, or death attributable to CVD, and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate associations between SBP trajectories and our outcomes of interest. Results: Four distinct SBP trajectories were identified: ‘low decline’ (40%), ‘high decline’ (6%), ‘low stable’ (48%), and ‘high stable’ (5%) (Figure 1). Relative to the low decline group, the low stable group was associated with a 29% increased risk of CVD (HR: 1.29, 95%CI: 1.06-1.57) and the high stable group was associated with a 76% increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.76, 95%CI: 1.15-2.68) after baseline multivariable adjustment. Relative to the low stable group, the high stable group was associated with a 54% increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.54, 95%CI: 1.05-2.28). When adjusting for average blood pressure across the 12 month time period, there were no significant differences in outcomes. Conclusion: We identified 4 SBP trajectories using data from SPRINT and found differences in the risk of CVD and all-cause mortality after baseline adjustment. However, there were no differences in the risk of these outcomes after adjusting for average blood pressure over time. These results suggest that the pattern of blood pressure control may not be relevant as long as the target blood pressure is achieved.

scholarly journals Workload-indexed blood pressure response is superior to peak systolic blood pressure in predicting all-cause mortality

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 978-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristofer Hedman ◽  
Nicholas Cauwenberghs ◽  
Jeffrey W Christle ◽  
Tatiana Kuznetsova ◽  
Francois Haddad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Exercise Testing ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Metabolic Equivalents ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Clinical Exercise Testing

Aims The association between peak systolic blood pressure (SBP) during exercise testing and outcome remains controversial, possibly due to the confounding effect of external workload (metabolic equivalents of task (METs)) on peak SBP as well as on survival. Indexing the increase in SBP to the increase in workload (SBP/MET-slope) could provide a more clinically relevant measure of the SBP response to exercise. We aimed to characterize the SBP/MET-slope in a large cohort referred for clinical exercise testing and to determine its relation to all-cause mortality. Methods and results Survival status for male Veterans who underwent a maximal treadmill exercise test between the years 1987 and 2007 were retrieved in 2018. We defined a subgroup of non-smoking 10-year survivors with fewer risk factors as a lower-risk reference group. Survival analyses for all-cause mortality were performed using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs (95% confidence interval)) adjusted for baseline age, test year, cardiovascular risk factors, medications and comorbidities. A total of 7542 subjects were followed over 18.4 (interquartile range 16.3) years. In lower-risk subjects ( n = 709), the median (95th percentile) of the SBP/MET-slope was 4.9 (10.0) mmHg/MET. Lower peak SBP (<210 mmHg) and higher SBP/MET-slope (>10 mmHg/MET) were both associated with 20% higher mortality (adjusted HRs 1.20 (1.08–1.32) and 1.20 (1.10–1.31), respectively). In subjects with high fitness, a SBP/MET-slope > 6.2 mmHg/MET was associated with a 27% higher risk of mortality (adjusted HR 1.27 (1.12–1.45)). Conclusion In contrast to peak SBP, having a higher SBP/MET-slope was associated with increased risk of mortality. This simple, novel metric can be considered in clinical exercise testing reports.

scholarly journals The Relationship Between Visit-to-Visit Variability in Systolic Blood Pressure and All-Cause Mortality in the General Population

Hypertension ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Muntner ◽  
Daichi Shimbo ◽  
Marcello Tonelli ◽  
Kristi Reynolds ◽  
Donna K. Arnett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
General Population ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
The Relationship

Modifying Effect of Statins on Fatal Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial: A Post Hoc Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Rivera ◽  
Leonardo Tamariz ◽  
Maritza Suarez ◽  
Gabriel Contreras
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Statin Group ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Modifying Effect ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Event Rates

Background: Management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients includes efforts directed toward modifying traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Such efforts include optimal management of hypertension together with the initiation of statin therapy. Methods: In this observational study, we determine the modifying effect of statins on the relationship of systolic blood pressure (SBP) goal with mortality and other outcomes in patients with CKD participating in a clinical trial. At baseline, 2,646 CKD patients (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) were randomized to an intensive SBP goal < 120 mm Hg or standard SBP goal <140 mm Hg. One thousand two hundred and seventy-three were not on statin, 1,354 were on a statin, and in 19 the use of statin was unknown. The 2 primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. Results: The relationships of SBP goal with all-cause mortality (interaction p = 0.009) and cardiovascular (CV) mortality (interaction p = 0.021) were modified by the use of statin after adjusting for age, gender, race, CVD history, smoking, aspirin use, and blood pressure at baseline. In the statin group, targeting SBP to < 120 mm Hg compared to SBP < 140 mm Hg significantly reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.44 [0.28–0.71]; event rates 1.16 vs. 2.5 per 100 patient-years) and CV mortality (aHR 0.29 [0.12–0.74]; event rates 0.28 vs. 0.92 per 100 patient-years) after a median follow-up of 3.26 years. In the non-statin group, the risk of all-cause mortality (aHR 1.07 [0.69–1.66]; event rates 2.01 vs. 1.94 per 100 patient-years) and CV mortality (aHR 1.42 [0.56–3.59]; event rates 0.52 vs. 0.41 per 100 patient-years) were not significantly different in both SBP goal arms. Conclusion: The combination of statin therapy and intensive SBP management leads to improved survival in hypertensive patients with CKD.

scholarly journals Association between different methods of assessing blood pressure variability and incident cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-192
Author(s):  
Toby O Smith ◽  
Julia Ann Sillito ◽  
Choon-Hian Goh ◽  
Abdel-Rahman Abdel-Fattah ◽  
Alice Einarsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Blood Pressure Variability ◽  
Moderate Quality ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Potential Association ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Incident Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Quality Evidence

Abstract Background Blood pressure variability (BPV) is a possible risk factor for adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality. There is uncertainty as to whether BPV is related to differences in populations studied, measurement methods or both. We systematically reviewed the evidence for different methods to assess blood pressure variability (BPV) and their association with future cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality. Methods Literature databases were searched to June 2019. Observational studies were eligible if they measured short-term BPV, defined as variability in blood pressure measurements acquired either over a 24-hour period or several days. Data were extracted on method of BPV and reported association (or not) on future cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality. Methodological quality was assessed using the CASP observational study tool and data narratively synthesised. Results Sixty-one studies including 3,333,801 individuals were eligible. BPV has been assessed by various methods including ambulatory and home-based BP monitors assessing 24-hour, “day-by-day” and “week-to-week” variability. There was moderate quality evidence of an association between BPV and cardiovascular events (43 studies analysed) or all-cause mortality (26 studies analysed) irrespective of the measurement method in the short- to longer-term. There was moderate quality evidence reporting inconsistent findings on the potential association between cardiovascular mortality, irrespective of methods of BPV assessment (17 studies analysed). Conclusion An association between BPV, cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular events and/or all-cause mortality were reported by the majority of studies irrespective of method of measurement. Direct comparisons between studies and reporting of pooled effect sizes were not possible.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document