scholarly journals The Impact of Medication Reviews Conducted in Primary Care on Hospital Admissions and Mortality: An Observational Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Veronica Milos Nymberg ◽  
Cecilia Lenander ◽  
Beata Borgström Bolmsjö
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Medication Reviews ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Does a tailored intervention to promote adherence in patients with chronic lung disease affect exacerbations? A randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Gregoriano ◽  
Thomas Dieterle ◽  
Anna-Lisa Breitenstein ◽  
Selina Dürr ◽  
Amanda Baum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Ambulatory Setting ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Phone Calls ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Inhaled Medication

Abstract Background Poor medication-adherence is common in chronic lung patients, resulting in reduced health-outcomes and increased healthcare-costs. This study aimed to investigate the impact of an acoustic reminder and support calls on adherence to inhaled therapy in asthma and COPD patients and to determine their effect on exacerbations. Methods This single-blinded randomized controlled trial investigated asthma and COPD patients during 6 months in an ambulatory setting. The intervention consisted of daily alarm clock and support phone calls, whenever use of rescue medication doubled or inhaled medication was not taken as prescribed. Primary outcome was time to next exacerbation. Frequency of exacerbations, adherence to inhaled medication and quality of life scores were secondary outcomes. Cox and Poisson regression were used to determine intervention effect on time to exacerbation and frequency of exacerbations, respectively. Results Seventy-five participants were assigned to the intervention group and 74 to usual follow-up care. During a median follow-up of 6.2 months, 22 and 28% in the intervention and control groups respectively, experienced at least one exacerbation. Intervention had no effect on time to first exacerbation (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.21 to 2.07, P = .24), but showed a trend toward a 39% decreased frequency of exacerbations (RR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.03, P = .070) for the adjusted models, respectively. The intervention group had significantly more days with 80–100% taking adherence regarding puff inhalers (82 ± 14% vs. 60 ± 30%, P < .001) and dry powder capsules (90 ± .10% vs. 80 ± 21%, P = .01). Timing adherence in participants using puff inhalers was higher in the intervention group (69 ± 25% vs. 51 ± 33%, P < .001). No significant differences in QoL were found between the two groups. Conclusion Participants assigned to the intervention group had significantly better taking and timing adherence of inhaled medication resulting in a trend towards a decreased frequency of exacerbations. However, no effect on time to next exacerbation was observed. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02386722, Registered 14 February 2014.

The physical activity counselling (PAC) randomized controlled trial: rationale, methods, and interventions

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1170-1185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle S. Fortier ◽  
William Hogg ◽  
Tracey L. O’Sullivan ◽  
Christopher Blanchard ◽  
Robert D. Reid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Physical Activity Counselling ◽  
Metabolic Outcomes ◽  
Motivation And Confidence ◽  
The Impact

Primary care is a promising venue to build patient motivation and confidence to increase physical activity (PA). Physician PA counselling has demonstrated some success; however, maintenance of behaviour change appears to require more intensive interventions. In reality, most physicians do not have the necessary training nor the time for this type of counselling. The purpose of this paper is to outline the rationale, methods, and interventions for the ongoing physical activity counselling (PAC) randomized controlled trial (RCT), which aims to assess the impact of integrating a PA counsellor into a primary care practice. This RCT has 2 arms: (i) brief PA counselling (2–4 min) from a health care provider and (ii) brief PA counselling + intensive PA counselling from a PA counsellor (3 months). The impact of this intervention is being evaluated using the comprehensive RE-AIM framework. One hundred twenty insufficiently active adult patients, aged 18 to 69 y and recruited during regular primary care visits have been randomized. Dependent measures include psychological mediators, PA participation, quality of life, and physical and metabolic outcomes. The PAC project represents an innovative, theoretically-based approach to promoting PA in primary care, focusing on psychological mediators of change. We anticipate that key lessons from this study will be useful for shaping future public health interventions, theories, and research.

scholarly journals A Mobile Health Salt Reduction Intervention for People With Hypertension: Results of a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Payne Riches ◽  
Carmen Piernas ◽  
Paul Aveyard ◽  
James P Sheppard ◽  
Mike Rayner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Salt Intake ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Salt Content ◽  
Salt Reduction ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

BACKGROUND A high-salt diet is a risk factor for hypertension and cardiovascular disease; therefore, reducing dietary salt intake is a key part of prevention strategies. There are few effective salt reduction interventions suitable for delivery in the primary care setting, where the majority of the management and diagnosis of hypertension occurs. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of a complex behavioral intervention to lower salt intake in people with elevated blood pressure and test the trial procedures for a randomized controlled trial to investigate the intervention’s effectiveness. METHODS This feasibility study was an unblinded, randomized controlled trial of a mobile health intervention for salt reduction versus an advice leaflet (control). The intervention was developed using the Behavior Change Wheel and comprised individualized, brief advice from a health care professional with the use of the SaltSwap app. Participants with an elevated blood pressure recorded in the clinic were recruited through primary care practices in the United Kingdom. Primary outcomes assessed the feasibility of progression to a larger trial, including follow-up attendance, fidelity of intervention delivery, and app use. Secondary outcomes were objectively assessed using changes in salt intake (measured via 24-hour urine collection), salt content of purchased foods, and blood pressure. Qualitative outcomes were assessed using the think-aloud method, and the process outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 47 participants were randomized. All progression criteria were met: follow-up attendance (45/47, 96%), intervention fidelity (25/31, 81%), and app use (27/31, 87%). There was no evidence that the intervention significantly reduced the salt content of purchased foods, salt intake, or blood pressure; however, this feasibility study was not powered to detect changes in secondary outcomes. Process and qualitative outcomes demonstrated that the trial design was feasible and the intervention was acceptable to both individuals and practitioners and positively influenced salt intake behaviors. CONCLUSIONS The intervention was acceptable and feasible to deliver within primary care; the trial procedures were practicable, and there was sufficient signal of potential efficacy to change salt intake. With some improvements to the intervention app, a larger trial to assess intervention effectiveness for reducing salt intake and blood pressure is warranted. CLINICALTRIAL International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 20910962; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN20910962

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document