scholarly journals Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Early Morning Symptoms of COPD Instrument (EMSCI)

2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 1633-1645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asha Hareendran ◽  
Barry Make ◽  
Erica Zaiser ◽  
Esther Garcia Gil
2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. A179 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Mocarski ◽  
A. Hareendran ◽  
M.H. Jen ◽  
E. Zaiser ◽  
B. Make

CHEST Journal ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 144 (4) ◽  
pp. 694A
Author(s):  
Sean Sullivan ◽  
Michelle Mocarski ◽  
Qian Cai ◽  
Judith Stephenson ◽  
Hiangkiat Tan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. e20210156
Author(s):  
Maria Montes de Oca1 ◽  
Maria Victorina Lopez Varela2 ◽  
Ana Maria B. Menezes3 ◽  
Fernando C. Wehrmeister3 ◽  
Larissa Ramirez4 ◽  
...  

Objective: To assess the frequency and severity of 24-hour respiratory symptoms according to COPD GOLD-ABCD classification (2017-version), the distribution of the patients with COPD into GOLD categories using mMRC (=2) or CAT (=10) scores, and agreement between these cut-off points. Methods: In this cross-sectional study (LASSYC study), 24-hour day respiratory symptoms were assessed by the Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD (E-RS) questionnaire, Nighttime Symptoms of COPD Instrument (NiSCI), Early Morning Symptoms of COPD Instrument (EMSCI), CAT and mMRC scores. Results: Among the 734 patients with COPD, 61% were male, age 69.6±8.7 years, FEV1% post-BD 49.1±17.5%, mMRC 1.8±1.0 and CAT 15.3±.8.1. By mMRC 33.7% were group-A, 29.2% group-B, 10.2% group-C and 26.9% group-D. By CAT 22.3% were group-A, 41% group-B, 4.8% group-C and 31.9% group-D. Using the mMRC the severity of E-RS, NiSCI and EMSCI scores increased from group A to D. Using the CAT, the groups B and D had the higher scores. Agreement between mMRC and CAT was 89.5% (Kappa statistics=75.7%). For mMRC score of 2, CAT score of =11 showed the maximum Youden's index (1.34). For mMRC score of 1, CAT score of =9 and =10 showed the maximum Youden's index (1.48). Conclusion: GOLD COPD classification by CAT seems to better discriminate 24-hour symptoms. Results do not support the equivalent use of CAT=10 and mMRC=2 for assessing symptoms.


Author(s):  
Michelle Mocarski ◽  
Katherine Houghton ◽  
Andrew Palsgrove ◽  
Asha Hareendran ◽  
Michael Schaefer ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. A496-A497 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Palsgrove ◽  
K. Houghton ◽  
A. Hareendran ◽  
M. Schaefer ◽  
J. Setyawan ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. A239 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.D. Sullivan ◽  
Q. Cai ◽  
M. Mocarski ◽  
J.J. Stephenson ◽  
H. Tan ◽  
...  

Thorax ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 70 (8) ◽  
pp. 757-763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam P Garrow ◽  
Naimat Khan ◽  
Sarah Tyson ◽  
Jørgen Vestbo ◽  
Dave Singh ◽  
...  

AimEarly morning symptoms (EMS) in people with COPD are associated with poor health, impaired activities and increased exacerbation risk. We describe the development and preliminary validation of the Manchester Early Morning Symptom Index (MEMSI) to quantify EMS in COPD.MethodsFocus groups and cognitive debriefing with patients with COPD were used to develop the potential item list, followed by a cross-sectional study to finalise the items for inclusion. In addition to test-retest reliability, comparisons with the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire-C (SGRQ-C), modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) evaluated construct validity. Hierarchical methods informed item deletion and Rasch analysis was applied to assess scale unidimensionality.Results23 items were identified from the focus groups and debriefings. The cross-sectional study involved 203 patients with COPD (mean age 64.7 SD 7.5 years, male 63%, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD): 1:14% 2:41% 3:25% 4: 7%). 13 items were removed during item reduction. MEMSI contains 10 items, demonstrates good overall fit to the Rasch model (χ2 p=0.26) and item score distribution; excellent reliability (Person Separation Index: 0.91) and good test-retest repeatability (r=0.82). It correlates with the SGRQ-C (r=0.73), FACIT-F (r=−0.65) and HADS (r=0.53–0.54) indicating good construct validity.ConclusionsMEMSI is a reliable and valid unidimensional measure of EMS for patients with COPD. It is simple to use and score supporting its suitability for research and clinical use. Work is underway to determine the minimal clinical important difference and cross-cultural validity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document