scholarly journals The Incidence, Risk Factors, and Patterns of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-Related Venous Thrombosis in Cancer Patients Followed Up by Ultrasound

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 4329-4340
Author(s):  
Xiang Li ◽  
Guodong Wang ◽  
Kun Yan ◽  
Shanshan Yin ◽  
Hongzhi Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter ◽  
Central Catheter ◽  
Incidence Risk

Peripherally inserted central catheter-related complications in cancer patients: a prospective study of over 50,000 catheter days

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junren Kang ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
Wenyan Sun ◽  
Ruibin Ge ◽  
Hailong Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Significant Risk Factor ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter ◽  
Central Catheter ◽  
Multicenter Cohort Study ◽  
Related Factors

Purpose To evaluate incidence and risk factors of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)-related complications in cancer patients. Methods A prospective, multicenter, cohort study of cancer patients with PICC insertion was performed from February 1, 2013 to April 24, 2014. All patients were monitored in clinic until PICCs were removed. The primary endpoint was PICC removal due to complications. Patient-, catheter- and insertion-related factors were analyzed in univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify significant independent risk factors for PICC-related complications. Results There were 477 cancer patients included, for a total of 50,841 catheter-days. Eighty-one patients (17.0%) developed PICC-related complications, with an incidence of 1.59 per 1000 catheter days. Thirty-six (7.5%) PICCs were removed because of complications. The most common complications were skin allergy (4.6%), catheter occlusion (3.4%) and accidental withdrawal (2.3%). Nine (1.9%) patients developed symptomatic upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (UEDVT) and central line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) was shown in six (1.3%) PICCs with an infection rate 0.12 per 1000 catheter days. In multivariable analysis, body mass index (BMI) >25 (odds ratio, 2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-3.47, p = 0.004) was shown to be a significant risk factor for PICC complications. Conclusions Cancer patients with BMI greater than 25 were more likely to have PICC complications.

scholarly journals The Influence of Venous Characteristics on Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-Related Symptomatic Venous Thrombosis in Cancer Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 11909-11920
Author(s):  
Guo-Dong Wang ◽  
Hong-Zhi Wang ◽  
Yan-Fen Shen ◽  
Jing Dong ◽  
Xin-Peng Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter ◽  
Central Catheter

scholarly journals Risk factors for peripherally inserted central catheter line–related deep venous thrombosis in critically ill intensive care unit patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 205031212092923
Author(s):  
M Bhargava ◽  
S Broccard ◽  
Y Bai ◽  
B Wu ◽  
EH Dincer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter ◽  
Central Catheter ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Central Catheters

Introduction: Central venous access using peripherally inserted central catheters is frequently used for patients receiving intravenous medications in the hospital or outpatients. Although there are several benefits of peripherally inserted central catheters, such as ease of insertion, low procedure-related risk and higher patient satisfaction, there are complications associated with peripherally inserted central catheter use. Despite some studies evaluating peripherally inserted central catheter line–related complications, the factors associated with peripherally inserted central catheter–related deep venous thrombosis in critically ill medical-surgical patients are poorly described. The objective of this case-control study was to identify the risk factors associated with peripherally inserted central catheter line–related deep venous thrombosis in critically ill medical-surgical intensive care unit patients in a community hospital. Methods: We abstracted relevant clinical data from 21 cases with symptomatic peripherally inserted central catheter–related deep venous thrombosis and 42 controls with peripherally inserted central catheters but no deep venous thrombosis. Results: Of the factors evaluated, female gender, the use of triple lumen peripherally inserted central catheters, larger outer diameter, and open (vs valve) peripherally inserted central catheters were associated with venous thrombosis. In this retrospective study, we did not identify any association of peripherally inserted central catheter–related deep venous thrombosis with a prior history of deep venous thrombosis, use of alteplase, antiplatelet therapy, prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation, international normalized ratio, platelet count and the use of peripherally inserted central catheters for total parenteral nutrition. Conclusion: Our study indicates that the catheter size relative to the diameter of the vein could be an important risk factor for the development of peripherally inserted central catheter–related deep venous thrombosis. The study findings should be confirmed in a larger study designed to identify risk factors of peripherally inserted central catheter–related deep venous thrombosis. In the meantime, the peripherally inserted central catheter lines should be used judiciously in critically ill patients.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Quality of Life of Patients with Breast or Colon Cancer with an Arm Vein Port (TIVAD) Versus a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC)

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 1495-1506
Author(s):  
Brent Burbridge ◽  
Hyun Lim ◽  
Lynn Dwernychuk ◽  
Ha Le ◽  
Tehmina Asif ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter ◽  
Central Catheter ◽  
Access Device ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Venous Access Device

Introduction: Venous access is a crucial element in chemotherapy delivery. It remains unclear whether cancer patients prefer a port to a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Our study aimed to assess cancer patients’ satisfaction with their venous access device and to compare the quality of life (QoL) of subjects with a PICC to those with a port. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, EORTC QLQ-C30, and a locally developed quality of life survey (QLAVD), designed to assess satisfaction with venous access devices, were administered to breast or colorectal cancer patients over a one-year period following the device insertion. Mixed effects models were used to assess changes on mean scores at different time points. Results: A total of 101 patients were recruited over a three-year period, (PICC group, n = 50; port group, n = 51). Survey response rates for months one and three were 72% and 48%, respectively. Overall, no significant differences were noted between the two groups in relation to EORTC QOL. At three months, the mean pain scores were 3.5 ± 2.3 for the port and 1.3 ± 0.75 for PICC (<0.001). The mean score for a negative effect of the venous access device on psychosocial well-being was 6.0 ± 4.1 for PICC and 3.0 ± 2.7 for the port (p = 0.005). Complications related to PICCs occurred in 38% patients versus 41% with a port (p > 0.24). Conclusions: Although subjects with a port experienced more pain during the device insertion or access for chemotherapy, it had a smaller negative impact on psychosocial scores than the PICC. No significant differences in complications rates were observed between the two devices.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document