scholarly journals Is the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine–cystatin C equation useful for glomerular filtration rate estimation in the elderly?

2013 ◽  
pp. 1387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xun Liu ◽  
Huijuan Ma ◽  
Cheng Wang ◽  
Hua Tang ◽  
Ming Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Cystatin C ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Disease Epidemiology ◽  
Rate Estimation ◽  
Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation

scholarly journals Prospects for improved glomerular filtration rate estimation based on creatinine—results from a transnational multicentre study

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 674-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Björk ◽  
Ulf Nyman ◽  
Marie Courbebaisse ◽  
Lionel Couzi ◽  
R Neil Dalton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Disease Epidemiology ◽  
Gfr Estimation ◽  
Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation

Abstract Background The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine equation is routinely used to assess renal function but exhibits varying accuracy depending on patient characteristics and clinical presentation. The overall aim of the present study was to assess if and to what extent glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation based on creatinine can be improved. Methods In a cross-sectional analysis covering the years 2003–17, CKD-EPI was validated against measured GFR (mGFR; using various tracer methods) in patients with high likelihood of chronic kidney disease (CKD; five CKD cohorts, n = 8365) and in patients with low likelihood of CKD (six community cohorts, n = 6759). Comparisons were made with the Lund–Malmö revised equation (LMR) and the Full Age Spectrum equation. Results 7In patients aged 18–39 years old, CKD-EPI overestimated GFR with 5.0–16 mL/min/1.73 m2 in median in both cohort types at mGFR levels <120 mL/min/1.73 m2. LMR had greater accuracy than CKD-EPI in the CKD cohorts (P30, the percentage of estimated GFR within 30% of mGFR, 83.5% versus 76.6%). CKD-EPI was generally the most accurate equation in the community cohorts, but all three equations reached P30 above the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative benchmark of 90%. Conclusions None of the evaluated equations made optimal use of available data. Prospects for improved GFR estimation procedures based on creatinine exist, particularly in young adults and in settings where patients with suspected or manifest CKD are investigated.

scholarly journals Cistatina C: Um Marcador de Função Renal Promissor em Doentes com Lúpus Eritematoso Sistémico?

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lígia Peixoto ◽  
Patrício Aguiar ◽  
Raquel De Bragança ◽  
Joana Rosa Martins ◽  
Alba Janeiro Acabado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Cystatin C ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Disease Epidemiology

<strong>Purpose:</strong> Cystatin C has a higher correlation with glomerular filtration rate and a more significant clinical prognosis than creatinine. We sought to determine whether it is a marker of renal function different from creatinine (cystatin C potentially superior to creatinine), in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.<br /><strong>Material and Methods:</strong> 37 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus were evaluated. Serum cystatin C was determined by nephelometry and creatinine by modified Jaffe method. We compared five formulas: Chronic Kidney Disease – Epidemiology Collaboration cystiatin; Chronic Kidney Disease – Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine-cystatin; Cockcroft-Gault; Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease – Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine, using the latter as a reference. We analyzed the influence of clinical and laboratory factors in cystatin C variation, using multivariate linear regression.<br /><strong>Results:</strong> Cystatin C was singly elevated in ten participants, versus none isolated creatinine elevation, and this difference was significant (p = 0.002). There was a difference between the estimated glomerular filtration rate by Chronic Kidney Disease – Epidemiology Collaboration cystatin and by Chronic Kidney Disease – Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine (-6.0541 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.07), more pronounced for lower glomerular filtration rate. Consequently, Chronic Kidney Disease – Epidemiology Collaboration cystatin reclassified 4 patients as having chronic kidney disease de novo and 1 patient as not having chronic kidney disease (p = 0.375).<br />Cystatin C was only significantly influenced by age (p &lt; 0.001).<br /><strong>Discussion:</strong> Several reports showed cystatin C as a better marker to define chronic kidney disease, allowing more accurate classification and risk stratification, compared with creatinine. In this study, Cystatin C revealed as a promisor marker of renal function in patient with lupus, mainly in patients with lower glomerular filtration rates. The correlation between age and cystatin C seems to be a confounding<br />factor, as glomerular filtration rate physiologically declines with ageing.<br /><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Cystatin C was potentially superior to creatinine and in this study and cystatin C seems to detect changes in glomerular filtration rate earlier than creatinine and may be a better screening method for chronic kidney disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document