scholarly journals Emerging permanent filler technologies: focus on Aquamid

2014 ◽  
pp. 261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Yamauchi
Keyword(s):  
Permanent Filler

Surgical Lip Remodeling After Injection of Permanent Filler

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 565-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaele Rauso ◽  
Luigi Califano ◽  
Luigi Rugge ◽  
Fabrizio Chirico ◽  
Gianpaolo Tartaro
Keyword(s):  
Permanent Filler

Surgical Lip Remodeling Following Permanent Filler Injection

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaele Rauso ◽  
Romolo Fragola ◽  
Morena Fasano ◽  
Nicola Zerbinati ◽  
Giovanni Francesco Nicoletti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Filler Injection ◽  
Permanent Filler

scholarly journals Facial Gel Complication after Dental Injection: A Case Report

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 267-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fereydoun Pourdanesh ◽  
Shahin Shams ◽  
Hasan Mir Mohammad Sadeghi
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Local Anesthetic ◽  
Rare Complication ◽  
The United States ◽  
Polyacrylamide Gel ◽  
Filler Materials ◽  
Permanent Filler ◽  
History Of ◽  
Materials Used

Injectable gel is becoming increasingly popular for cosmetic reasons. The polyacrylamide gel (PAAG) is a permanent filler material used worldwide. In spite of the fact that the filler materials used today are considered quite safe, various complications have been reported in the literature. Hence PAAG use in the United States is not popular. As the area is very close to the dental field, a large complication potential is relatively considered following buccal dental injections. The aim of this article is to highlight a rare complication observed following a local anesthetic administration of a simple molar restoration in a healthy 33-year-old woman who had history of a filler augmentation in her cheek approximately 6 years ago.

Purified Polydimethylsiloxane (Silicone) as Dermal Filler Resolving the Controversy?

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ehab Akkary ◽  
Robert Shumway ◽  
Jay Barnett
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Dermal Filler ◽  
Off Label Use ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Permanent Filler ◽  
Nasolabial Folds ◽  
Silicone Migration ◽  
Label Use

Dermal fillers are widely used in Medical and Surgical Cosmetic practices. Temporary and semipermanent fillers are more commonly used for a wide variety of reasons; however, permanent fillers represent an excellent option in properly selected patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the off-label use of Silikon 1000 (S1000) as a permanent filler analyzing safety, durability, and patient satisfaction. This was a retrospective chart review of prospectively collected data. The study included 25 patients who underwent S1000 injection in 32 treatment areas. The following parameters were assessed: age, gender, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), number of treatments, duration of treatments, follow-up, complications, and interventions. Patients who had other fillers injected into the same area within 1 year before or after the S1000 injection were excluded from the study. In all, 32 treatment areas in 25 patients (21 females, 4 males) were included in the study. Five female patients received S1000 in more than one area. Treatment areas included the following: nose (n = 4), lips (n = 16), glabella (n = 4), nasolabial folds (n = 3), scars (acne or others) (n = 2), orbital rim (n = 2), and perioral (n = 1). Extrusion of silicone, migration, cosmetic deformity, hematoma, seroma, and infection were considered as inclusive criteria for injection complications. None of the patients developed any complications along the course of follow-up that ranged from 8-38 months; therefore, no intervention or surgery was needed to treat any adverse outcomes. All patients reported high satisfaction with the cosmetic results. Off-label use of highly purified polydimethylsiloxane as dermal filler is safe and durable. Being conservative is key to optimize outcomes and avoid complications. Proper approach involves injection of small doses using microdroplet technique to augment the tissue gradually over sessions at 1-2 months apart. Complications as silicone migration and irregularities can be largely avoided by following proper techniques and understanding the unique mechanism of action of S1000 compared with traditional fillers.

Skill, Technique Are Critical With Permanent Filler

2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
DAMIAN MCNAMARA
Keyword(s):  
Permanent Filler
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document