scholarly journals The 10-Point Plan 2021: Updated Concepts for Improved Procedural Safety During Facial Filler Treatments [Corrigendum]

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 1601-1602
Author(s):  
Izolda Heydenrych ◽  
Koenraad De Boulle ◽  
Krishan Mohan Kapoor ◽  
Dario Bertossi
Keyword(s):  
Facial Filler

Quality and Reliability of YouTube for Patient Information on Facial Fillers

2021 ◽  
pp. 074880682199140
Author(s):  
Manish J. Patel ◽  
Mit M. Patel ◽  
Brittany T. Abud ◽  
Robert T. Cristel
Keyword(s):  
Patient Education ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Dermal Filler ◽  
Accurate Information ◽  
Sufficient Information ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Educational Value ◽  
Facial Filler ◽  
Source Reliability

YouTube proves to be a source of health information for patients. This is the first study to analyze the source reliability and educational value of YouTube videos on facial filler treatments. On August 12, 2020, YouTube.com was queried using the keywords “facial filler” or “dermal filler” or “fillers.” A total of 100 were initially reviewed in which 74 videos met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Video characteristics were recorded, and each video was graded for source reliability and educational value by using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria and the Global Quality Score (GQS), respectively. Furthermore, each video was assessed to determine whether there was discussion of 5 different topics that were deemed to be useful to patients prior to undergoing a facial filler treatment. A total of 74 videos met the inclusion criteria and had an average length of 436 seconds (7 minutes and 16 seconds), 146 805 views, 1906 likes, 73 dislikes, and 241 comments. Forty-five videos (61%) were posted with an intention to educate patients, whereas 29 videos (39%) were posted with an intention to describe a patient’s experience with facial filler treatment. Patient education videos were found to have a significantly higher educational value ( PGQS < .001). Patient experience videos showed no difference in reliability score ( PJAMA > .05) to patient education videos, but patient experience videos were found to have lower educational value compared with patient education videos ( PGQS < .001). In addition, both categories are not providing sufficient information for informed decision-making prior to treatment deemed by the 5 selected categories we found most informative. As patients will continue to seek educational material online, clinicians should use this information to help primarily educate patients with standardized and accurate information about their treatment.

scholarly journals Concurrent ophthalmic artery occlusion and optic nerve infarction after cosmetic facial filler

2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (11) ◽  
pp. 2512
Author(s):  
InHwan Cho ◽  
Hyun-Hae Cho ◽  
DaeJoong Ma ◽  
MinSeong Kim
Keyword(s):  
Optic Nerve ◽  
Ophthalmic Artery ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Facial Filler

Unilateral Blindness With Bilateral Brain Infarction After Cosmetic Facial Filler Injection

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Suk Lee ◽  
Jun Yup Kim ◽  
Se Joon Woo
Keyword(s):  
Brain Infarction ◽  
Filler Injection ◽  
Facial Filler

An In Vitro Model Assessing the Penetration of Hyaluronidase through Optic Nerve Dura for Management of Hyaluronic Acid Facial Filler Embolism

2019 ◽  
Vol 144 (1) ◽  
pp. 43e-47e ◽  
Author(s):  
Namrata Adulkar ◽  
Charles Cheng ◽  
Lawrence Lee ◽  
Steve Rasmussen ◽  
Peter J. Dolman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hyaluronic Acid ◽  
Optic Nerve ◽  
In Vitro Model ◽  
Facial Filler ◽  
Vitro Model

A Rare Vascular Complication Caused by Autologous Fat Facial Filler

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 2323-2325
Author(s):  
Aiping Li ◽  
Jianwen Yang ◽  
Xiang Ren ◽  
Zhiwen Zhou ◽  
Wei Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Complication ◽  
Autologous Fat ◽  
Facial Filler
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document