scholarly journals Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Concomitant Boost After Breast Conserving Surgery: A Phase I–II Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 243-249
Author(s):  
Gabriella Macchia ◽  
Savino Cilla ◽  
Milly Buwenge ◽  
Alice Zamagni ◽  
Ilario Ammendolia ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (16) ◽  
pp. 2236-2242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia C. Formenti ◽  
Daniela Gidea-Addeo ◽  
Judith D. Goldberg ◽  
Daniel F. Roses ◽  
Amber Guth ◽  
...  

Purpose To report the clinical feasibility of a trial of accelerated whole-breast intensity modulated radiotherapy, with the patient in prone position, optimally to spare the heart and lung. Patients and Methods Patients with stages I or II breast cancer, excised by breast conserving surgery with negative margins, were eligible for this institutional review board–approved prospective trial. Computed tomography simulation was performed with the patient prone on a dedicated breast board, in the exact position used for treatment. A dose of 40.5 Gy, delivered at 2.7 Gy in 15 fractions, was prescribed to the index breast with an additional concomitant boost of 0.5 Gy delivered to the tumor bed, for a total dose of 48 Gy to the lumpectomy site. Physics constraints consisted of limiting ≤ 5% of the heart volume to receive ≥ 18 Gy and ≤ 10% of the ipsilateral lung volume to receive ≥ 20 Gy. Results Between September 2003 and August 2005, 91 patients were enrolled on the study. Median length of follow-up was 12 months (range, 1 to 28 months). In all patients the technique was feasible and heart and lung sparing was achieved as prescribed by the protocol. Acute toxicities consisting mostly of reversible grades 1-2 skin dermatitis (67%) and fatigue (18%) occurred in 75 patients. One patient sustained a regional recurrence rapidly followed by distant metastases. Conclusion Accelerated whole breast intensity modulated radiotherapy in the prone position is feasible and it permits a drastic reduction in the volume of lung and heart tissue exposed to significant radiation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 155 ◽  
pp. 261-268
Author(s):  
A. Michaelidou ◽  
D. Adjogatse ◽  
Y. Suh ◽  
L. Pike ◽  
C. Thomas ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 272-279
Author(s):  
Steven B. D. Murphy ◽  
Heather Drury-Smith

AbstractBackground and purposeTo determine which concomitant boost technique is dosimetrically superior in the treatment of breast cancer; volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or fixed field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (ff-IMRT).Materials and methodsIn total, 30 breast patients were re-planned with both VMAT and fixed field concomitant boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques. A hybrid technique was used delivering 80% of the dose through tangential beams and 20% through an integrated boost. A two-tailed t-test sample for means was used to compare the dosimetric differences between the techniques.ResultsMaximum dose was statistically lower for VMAT; 103·2 versus 103·7% for ff-IMRT along with statistically lower V2 Gy doses to the contralateral lung (0·7 versus 1·6%) and heart for both left- (19·0%/22·6%), and right- (5·5%/8·8%) sided patients, respectively. ff-IMRT boasted significantly lower ipsilateral lung V20, V18 and V10 Gy (7·9/8·6/13·1 versus 8·1/8·8/13·4%) than VMAT, respectively. No differences were found with minimum coverage, mean dose and V5 Gy to all organs at risk (OARs).ConclusionVMAT and ff-IMRT techniques demonstrate excellent target coverage and OAR sparing facilitated by the hybrid planning technique and deep inspiration breath hold. There is no obvious dosimetrically superior option between the two techniques. Reduced treatment times with VMAT make it more desirable to implement clinically.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document