scholarly journals Hearing Protection System By Using A Simple Noise Reduction Strategy

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izziddien Alsogkier
Keyword(s):  
Noise Reduction ◽  
Protection System ◽  
Hearing Protection ◽  
Reduction Strategy

scholarly journals Sparse grid-based adaptive noise reduction strategy for particle-in-cell schemes

2021 ◽  
pp. 100094
Author(s):  
Sriramkrishnan Muralikrishnan ◽  
Antoine J. Cerfon ◽  
Matthias Frey ◽  
Lee F. Ricketson ◽  
Andreas Adelmann
Keyword(s):  
Noise Reduction ◽  
Sparse Grid ◽  
Reduction Strategy ◽  
Particle In Cell ◽  
Adaptive Noise ◽  
Grid Based

Hybrid feedforward-feedback active noise reduction for hearing protection and communication

2006 ◽  
Vol 120 (4) ◽  
pp. 2026-2036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura R. Ray ◽  
Jason A. Solbeck ◽  
Alexander D. Streeter ◽  
Robert D. Collier
Keyword(s):  
Noise Reduction ◽  
Hearing Protection ◽  
Active Noise ◽  
Active Noise Reduction

Evaluation of a Transient Noise Reduction Strategy for Hearing Aids

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (08) ◽  
pp. 606-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
HaiHong Liu ◽  
Hua Zhang ◽  
Ruth A. Bentler ◽  
Demin Han ◽  
Luo Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Noise Reduction ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Background Noise ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Sound Quality ◽  
T Test ◽  
Reduction Strategy ◽  
Speech Stimuli ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Speech Clarity

Background: Transient noise can be disruptive for people wearing hearing aids. Ideally, the transient noise should be detected and controlled by the signal processor without disrupting speech and other intended input signals. A technology for detecting and controlling transient noises in hearing aids was evaluated in this study. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a transient noise reduction strategy on various transient noises and to determine whether the strategy has a negative impact on sound quality of intended speech inputs. Research Design: This was a quasi-experimental study. The study involved 24 hearing aid users. Each participant was asked to rate the parameters of speech clarity, transient noise loudness, and overall impression for speech stimuli under the algorithm-on and algorithm-off conditions. During the evaluation, three types of stimuli were used: transient noises, speech, and background noises. The transient noises included “knife on a ceramic board,” “mug on a tabletop,” “office door slamming,” “car door slamming,” and “pen tapping on countertop.” The speech sentences used for the test were presented by a male speaker in Mandarin. The background noises included “party noise” and “traffic noise.” All of these sounds were combined into five listening situations: (1) speech only, (2) transient noise only, (3) speech and transient noise, (4) background noise and transient noise, and (5) speech and background noise and transient noise. Results: There was no significant difference on the ratings of speech clarity between the algorithm-on and algorithm-off (t-test, p = 0.103). Further analysis revealed that speech clarity was significant better at 70 dB SLP than 55 dB SPL (p < 0.001). For transient noise loudness: under the algorithm-off condition, the percentages of subjects rating the transient noise to be somewhat soft, appropriate, somewhat loud, and too loud were 0.2, 47.1, 29.6, and 23.1%, respectively. The corresponding percentages under the algorithm-on were 3.0, 72.6, 22.9, and 1.4%, respectively. A significant difference on the ratings of the transient noise loudness was found between the algorithm-on and algorithm-off (t-test, p < 0.001). For overall impression for speech stimuli: under the algorithm-off condition, the percentage of subjects rating the algorithm to be not helpful at all, somewhat helpful, helpful, and very helpful for speech stimuli were 36.5, 20.8, 33.9, and 8.9%, respectively. Under the algorithm-on condition, the corresponding percentages were 35.0, 19.3, 30.7, and 15.0%, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed there was a significant difference on the ratings of overall impression on speech stimuli. The ratings under the algorithm-on condition were significantly more helpful for speech understanding than the ratings under algorithm-off (t-test, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The transient noise reduction strategy appropriately controlled the loudness for most of the transient noises and did not affect the sound quality, which could be beneficial to hearing aid wearers.

A noise‐reduction strategy for speech based on phase‐opponency detectors

2005 ◽  
Vol 117 (4) ◽  
pp. 2541-2542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Om Deshmukh ◽  
Michael C. Anzalone ◽  
Carol Y. Espy‐Wilson ◽  
Laurel H. Carney
Keyword(s):  
Noise Reduction ◽  
Reduction Strategy

scholarly journals The effect of hearing protection devices on speech intelligibility of Persian employees

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mina Karami ◽  
Mohsen Aliabadi ◽  
Rostam Golmohammadi ◽  
Morteza Hamidi Nahrani
Keyword(s):  
Noise Reduction ◽  
Speech Intelligibility ◽  
Work Environments ◽  
Hearing Protection ◽  
Noise Attenuation ◽  
Speech Discrimination ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Protection Devices ◽  
Male Subjects ◽  
Speech Interference

Abstract Objective This study aimed to investigate the effect of hearing protection devices (HPDs) on speech intelligibility in Persian work environments. Three current earmuffs and three earplugs and one of the prototypes of molded earplug were tested on 15 male subjects which were randomly selected. The noise reduction of HPDs was measured based on the Real Ear Attenuation at Threshold (REAT) method. Speech intelligibility during using HPDs was determined based on the speech discrimination score (SDS) at two signal to noise (S/N) ratios (0 and + 5). Data were analyzed using SPSS 22. Results The actual to nominal noise reduction rating values were from 47 to 84% for HPDs. At two S/N ratios, no significant differences were observed in speech intelligibility using HPDs (p > 0.05). At S/N ratio = 0, the speech intelligibility descriptively has been only improved by using common earmuffs up to 9.07%. There was a significant difference up to 21.27% in speech intelligibility for proposed molded earplugs at S/N ratio = 0 (p < 0.05). Increasing the HPDs' noise attenuation values led to an increase in speech interference (p < 0.05). The HPDs with the minimum required noise attenuation while maintaining acceptable speech intelligibility should be worn by employees exposed to medium noise levels.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document