Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin after ischemic stroke: A review of the evidence

2015 ◽  
Vol 72 (19) ◽  
pp. 1623-1629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle A. Davis ◽  
Marta A. Miyares ◽  
Eric Dietrich
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy

Abstract 104: Disability After Minor Stroke and TIA in the POINT Trial

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett L Cucchiara ◽  
Jordan Elm ◽  
J Donald Easton ◽  
Shelagh Coutts ◽  
Joshua Willey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Recurrent Stroke ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Minor Stroke ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Index Event

Background and Purpose: To assess the effect of combination antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel versus aspirin alone on disability following TIA or minor stroke and to identify factors associated with disability. Methods: The POINT trial randomized patients with TIA or minor stroke (NIHSS≤3) within 12 hours of onset to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus clopidogrel versus aspirin alone. The primary outcome measure was a composite of stroke, MI, or vascular death. We performed a post-hoc exploratory analysis to examine the effect of treatment on overall disability (defined as mRS>1) at 90 days as well as disability ascribed by the local investigator to index or recurrent stroke. We also evaluated predictors of disability. Results: At 90 days, 188/1964 (9.6%) of patients enrolled with TIA and 471/2586 (18.2%) of those enrolled with stroke were disabled. Overall disability was similar between patients assigned DAPT versus aspirin alone (14.7% vs. 14.3%, OR 0.97, 95%CI 0.82-1.14, p=0.69). However, there were numerically fewer patients with disability in conjunction with a primary outcome event in the DAPT arm (3.0% vs. 4.0%, OR 0.73, 95%CI 0.53-1.01, p=0.06), and significantly fewer patients in the DAPT arm with disability attributed by the investigators to either the index event or recurrent stroke (5.9% vs. 7.4%, OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.99, p=0.04). Notably, disability attributed to the index event accounted for the majority of this difference (4.5% vs. 6.0%, OR 0.74 95% CI 0.57-0.96, p=0.02). In multivariate analysis of patients enrolled with TIA, disability was significantly associated with age, subsequent ischemic stroke, serious adverse events, and major bleeding. In patients enrolled with stroke, disability was associated with female sex, hypertension, diabetes, NIHSS score, recurrent ischemic stroke, subsequent myocardial infarction, and serious adverse events. Conclusions: In addition to reducing recurrent stroke in patients with acute minor stroke and TIA, dual antiplatelet therapy might reduce stroke-related disability.

scholarly journals Ticagrelor and Acetylsalicylic Acid after Placement of Pipeline Embolization Device for Cerebral Aneurysm: A Case Series

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jodi R DeGrote ◽  
Elizabeth M Olafson ◽  
Alexander Drofa ◽  
Evgueni Kouznetzov ◽  
Michael Manchak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acetylsalicylic Acid ◽  
Cerebral Aneurysm ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Attractive Alternative ◽  
Pipeline Embolization Device ◽  
End Point

<p><strong>ABSTRACT</strong><br /><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Background:</strong> Dual antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and a P2Y12-receptor antagonist is often used to prevent thrombotic complications after placement of a Pipeline embolization device (PED) for cerebral aneurysm. Although clopidogrel is common in this setting, high rates of nonresponse to this drug have made ticagrelor a potentially attractive alternative. <br /><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Objective:</strong> To describe safety and efficacy outcomes for ticagrelor following PED placement, including measurement of platelet function.<br /><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> A retrospective analysis of data was completed for patients who underwent PED placement for cerebral aneurysm at a single centre between November 2015 and March 2017, with subsequent prescription of ticagrelor and ASA as dual antiplatelet therapy. The primary end point was any ischemic stroke or death within 1 year after the procedure. Intracranial hemorrhage was a secondary end point. Additionally, measurement of and values for platelet reactivity units (PRUs) during receipt of ticagrelor and ASA were evaluated.<br /><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Results:</strong> A total of 29 patients were included in this retrospective study. One patient experienced ischemic stroke 226 days after placement of the PED. In addition, 3 patients died during the 1-year follow-up period for causes unrelated to stroke or bleeding complications. No cases of intra -cranial hemorrhage were observed. Samples for measurement of P2Y12 levels were drawn at the discretion of the neurointerventionalists, and the PRU value was measured at least once for 28 (97%) of the 29 patients. The mean number of PRU measurements per patient after initiation of ticagrelor was 2.1 (standard deviation [SD] 1). Mean PRU value after initiation of ticagrelor was 65 (SD 57). <br /><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> In this case series describing the use of ticagrelor and ASA as dual antiplatelet therapy after PED placement for cerebral aneurysm, there was just one ischemic stroke, which occurred after the dual antiplatelet therapy had been discontinued. Further prospective trials are needed to describe the utility of ticagrelor use after PED placement, as well as its dosing and monitoring.</p><p><strong>RÉSUMÉ</strong></p><p><strong></strong><strong>Contexte :</strong> Une bithérapie antiplaquettaire composée d’acide acétylsali-cylique (AAS) et d’un inhibiteur du récepteur P2Y12 est fréquemment utilisée pour prévenir les complications thrombotiques après la mise en place d’un dispositif d’embolisation Pipeline pour traiter un anévrisme cérébral. Quoique le clopidogrel soit souvent utilisé dans ce contexte, des taux élevés d’absence de réponse à ce médicament ont fait du ticagrélor une solution de rechange potentiellement intéressante. <br /><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Objectif :</strong> Décrire les résultats relatifs à la sécurité et à l’efficacité du ticagrélor après la mise en place d’un dispositif d’embolisation, y compris l’analyse de la fonction plaquettaire.<br /><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Méthodes :</strong> Une analyse rétrospective de données a été réalisée dans un seul centre entre novembre 2015 et mars 2017 à l’aide des dossiers médicaux de patients chez qui a été posé un dispositif d’embolisation Pipeline comme traitement pour un anévrisme cérébral et à qui a ensuite été prescrite une bithérapie antiplaquettaire de ticagrélor et d’AAS. Le critère d’évaluation principal était les cas d’infarctus cérébral ou de décès durant l’année suivant l’opération. Les cas d’hémorragie intracrânienne ont servi de critère d’évaluation secondaire. De plus, l’analyse a porté sur l’évaluation de la réactivité plaquettaire et sa quantification en unités de réaction au P2Y12 pendant la prise de ticagrélor et d’AAS.<br /><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Résultats :</strong> Au total, 29 patients ont été admis à la présente étude rétrospective. Un patient a subi un infarctus cérébral 226 jours après la mise en place d’un dispositif d’embolisation Pipeline. De plus, 3 patients sont décédés au cours de la période de suivi d’un an en raison de causes sans lien avec des complications liées à un accident vasculaire cérébral ou à une hémorragie. Aucun cas d’hémorragie intracrânienne n’a été observé. Les échantillons destinés à la mesure des unités de réaction au P2Y12 ont été prélevés selon le jugement des neuro-intervenants et l’évaluation de la réactivité plaquettaire a été réalisée au moins une fois chez 28 (97 %) des 29 patients. Le nombre moyen de mesures des unités de réaction au P2Y12 par patient était de 2,1 (écart-type de 1). Après l’amorce d’un traitement par ticagrélor, le résultat moyen en unités de réaction au P2Y12 était de 65 (écart-type de 57).</p><p><strong>Conclusions :</strong> Dans la présente série de cas décrivant l’utilisation d’une bithérapie antiplaquettaire composée de ticagrélor et d’AAS après la mise en place d’un dispositif d’embolisation Pipeline comme traitement pour un anévrisme cérébral, seul un cas d’infarctus cérébral a été observé et il s’est produit après l’arrêt de la bithérapie antiplaquettaire. De plus amples études prospectives sont nécessaires pour décrire l’utilité et la posologie du ticagrélor ainsi que le suivi du traitement après la mise en place d’un dis-positif d’embolisation Pipeline.</p>

Indications and Evidence for Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Acute Ischemic Stroke

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-137
Author(s):  
Jessica Ringler ◽  
Mackenzie Steck ◽  
Samarth P. Shah ◽  
Katleen W. Chester
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Minor Ischemic Stroke

2019 ◽  
Vol 82 (4-6) ◽  
pp. 93-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangjian Zhao ◽  
Fanzhen Lin ◽  
Ziran Wang ◽  
Xiaolin Shao ◽  
Yanxue Gong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator ◽  
Stroke Recurrence ◽  
Minor Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Scale Scores ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

Objective: To verify the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy after intravenous thrombolysis for acute minor ischemic stroke (AMIS). Methods: AMIS patients who received recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) intravenous thrombolysis from January to October 2018 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into the aspirin (ASP) and ASP + clopidogrel (ASP-CLO) groups based on the type of antiplatelet therapy to compare the rates of good clinical outcome, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) after thrombolysis, and mortality in 90 days. Results: A total of 207 patients were included (group ASP, 105 patients; group ASP-CLO, 102 patients). There was no significant difference in the baseline clinical data between the 2 groups. The ­90-day modified Rankin scale scores (66.7 vs. 82.4%, p = 0.009) showed a statistically significant difference, but SICH (1.0 vs. 1.0%, p = 0.917) and 90-day mortality (1.9 vs. 1.0%, p = 0.585) showed no significant difference between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Short-term (21 days) dual antiplatelet therapy after rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis for AMIS can improve the prognosis, reduce the risk of stroke recurrence, without increasing the risk of bleeding and mortality.

Dual antiplatelet therapy after carotid artery stenting: trends and outcomes in a large national database

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-13
Author(s):  
Eric S Sussman ◽  
Michael Jin ◽  
Arjun V Pendharkar ◽  
Benjamin Pulli ◽  
Austin Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
National Database ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Hemorrhagic Complications ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Large National Database

BackgroundWhile dual antiplatelet therapy (dAPT) is standard of care following carotid artery stenting (CAS), the optimal dAPT regimen and duration has not been established.MethodsWe canvassed a large national database (IBM MarketScan) to identify patients receiving carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or CAS for treatment of ischemic stroke or carotid artery stenosis from 2007 to 2016. We performed univariable and multivariable regression methods to evaluate the impact of covariates on post-CAS stroke-free survival, including post-discharge antiplatelet therapy.ResultsA total of 79 084 patients diagnosed with ischemic stroke or carotid stenosis received CEA (71 178; 90.0%) or CAS (7906; 10.0%). After adjusting for covariates, <180 days prescribed post-CAS P2Y12-inhibition was associated with increased risk for stroke (<90 prescribed days HR=1.421, 95% CI 1.038 to 1.946; 90–179 prescribed days HR=1.484, 95% CI 1.045 to 2.106). The incidence of hemorrhagic complications was higher during the period of prescribed P2Y12-inhibition (1.16% per person-month vs 0.49% per person-month after discontinuation, P<0.001). The rate of extracranial hemorrhage was nearly six-fold higher while on dAPT (6.50% per patient-month vs 1.16% per patient-month, P<0.001), and there was a trend towards higher rate of intracranial hemorrhage that did not reach statistical significance (5.09% per patient-month vs 3.69% per patient-month, P=0.0556). Later hemorrhagic events beyond 30 days post-CAS were significantly more likely to be extracranial (P=0.028).ConclusionsIncreased duration of post-CAS dAPT is associated with lower rates of readmissions for stroke, and with increased risk of hemorrhagic complications, particularly extracranial hemorrhage. The potential benefit of prolonging dAPT with regard to ischemic complications must be balanced with the corresponding increased risk of predominantly extracranial hemorrhagic complications.

Abstract TMP22: Safety of Pretreatment With Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nitin Goyal ◽  
Georgios Tsivgoulis ◽  
Ali Kerro ◽  
Aristeidis H Katsanos ◽  
Rashi Krishnan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis

scholarly journals Effect of Argatroban Combined With Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Early Neurological Deterioration in Acute Minor Posterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 107602962090413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling-Shan Zhou ◽  
Xiao-Qiu Li ◽  
Zhong-He Zhou ◽  
Hui-Sheng Chen
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Posterior Circulation ◽  
Neurological Deterioration ◽  
Nihss Score ◽  
Safety Outcome ◽  
Early Neurological Deterioration ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

There is a lack of studies on anticoagulant plus antiplatelet therapy for acute ischemic stroke. The present study made a pilot effort to investigate the efficacy and safety of argatroban plus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with acute posterior circulation ischemic stroke (PCIS). We retrospectively collected patients diagnosed with acute PCIS according to inclusion/exclusion criteria. According to treatment drugs, patients were divided into an argatroban plus DAPT group and a DAPT group. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of early neurological deterioration (END). The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. All outcomes were compared between the 2 groups before and after propensity score matching (PSM). A total of 502 patients were enrolled in the study, including 35 patients with argatroban plus DAPT and 467 patients with DAPT. There was a higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score in the argatroban plus DAPT group than the DAPT group before PSM (3 vs 2, P = .017). Compared with the DAPT group, the argatroban plus DAPT group had no END (before PSM: 0% vs 6.2%, P = .250; after PSM: 0% vs 5.9%, P = .298). Argatroban plus DAPT yielded a significant decrease in the NIHSS score from baseline to 7 days after hospitalization, compared with that of the DAPT group before PSM ( P = .032), but not after PSM ( P = .369). No symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was found in any patient. A short-term combination of argatroban with DAPT appears safe in acute minor PCIS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document