Collaboration between a college of pharmacy and a for-profit health system at an academic medical center

2012 ◽  
Vol 69 (13) ◽  
pp. 1150-1156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew L. Bird ◽  
Rebecca L. Dunn ◽  
Tracy M. Hagemann ◽  
Michael E. Burton ◽  
Mark L. Britton ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 170-174
Author(s):  
Brian L. Erstad ◽  
Tina Aramaki ◽  
Kurt Weibel

Objective: To provide lessons learned for colleges of pharmacy and large health systems that are contemplating or in the process of undergoing integration. Method: This report describes the merger of an academic medical center and large health system with a focus on the implications of the merger for pharmacy from the perspectives of both a college of pharmacy and a health system’s pharmacy services. Results: Overarching pharmacy issues to consider include having an administrator from the college of pharmacy directly involved in the merger negotiation discussions, having at least one high-level administrator from the college of pharmacy and one high-level pharmacy administrator from the health system involved in ongoing discussions about implications of the merger and changes that are likely to affect teaching, research, and clinical service activities, having focused discussions between college and health system pharmacy administrators on the implications of the merger on experiential and research-related activities, and anticipating concerns by clinical faculty members affected by the merger. Conclusion: The integration of a college of pharmacy and a large health system during the acquisition of an academic medical center can be challenging for both organizations, but appropriate pre- and post-merger discussions between college and health system pharmacy administrators that include a strategic planning component can assuage concerns and problems that are likely to arise, increasing the likelihood of a mutually beneficial collaboration.


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasilios Athans ◽  
Elizabeth Neuner ◽  
Andrea Pallotta ◽  
Jeffrey Chalmers ◽  
Eric Vogan ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaitlyn Rivard ◽  
Elizabeth Neuner ◽  
Vasilios Athans ◽  
Andrea Pallotta ◽  
Seth Bauer ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. 13-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren E. Brownell ◽  
Meagan L. Adamsick ◽  
Erin K. McCreary ◽  
Joshua P. Vanderloo ◽  
Erika J. Ernst ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 380-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyeoneui Kim ◽  
Elizabeth Bell ◽  
Jihoon Kim ◽  
Amy Sitapati ◽  
Joe Ramsdell ◽  
...  

Background: Implementation of patient preferences for use of electronic health records for research has been traditionally limited to identifiable data. Tiered e-consent for use of de-identified data has traditionally been deemed unnecessary or impractical for implementation in clinical settings. Methods: We developed a web-based tiered informed consent tool called informed consent for clinical data and bio-sample use for research (iCONCUR) that honors granular patient preferences for use of electronic health record data in research. We piloted this tool in 4 outpatient clinics of an academic medical center. Results: Of patients offered access to iCONCUR, 394 agreed to participate in this study, among whom 126 patients accessed the website to modify their records according to data category and data recipient. The majority consented to share most of their data and specimens with researchers. Willingness to share was greater among participants from an Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) clinic than those from internal medicine clinics. The number of items declined was higher for for-profit institution recipients. Overall, participants were most willing to share demographics and body measurements and least willing to share family history and financial data. Participants indicated that having granular choices for data sharing was appropriate, and that they liked being informed about who was using their data for what purposes, as well as about outcomes of the research. Conclusion: This study suggests that a tiered electronic informed consent system is a workable solution that respects patient preferences, increases satisfaction, and does not significantly affect participation in research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document