scholarly journals Development of an automated AmpliSeq™ library building workflow for biological stain samples on the Biomek® 3000

BioTechniques ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 342-344
Author(s):  
Maryam Sharafi Farzad ◽  
Brian Møllegaard Pedersen ◽  
Helle Smidt Mogensen ◽  
Claus Børsting

Here, we present the development of an automated AmpliSeq™ (ThermoFischer, MA, USA) workflow for library building using the Biomek® 3000 Laboratory Automation Workstation (Beckman Coulter Inc., CA, USA), in which the total volume of PCR reagents and reagents for library preparation are reduced by one-half. The automated AmpliSeq workflow was tested using 43 stain samples (blood, bone, muscle tissue, semen, swab, nail scrape and cigarette butts) collected from crime scenes. The sequencing data were evaluated for locus balance, heterozygous allele balance and noise. The performance of libraries built with the automated AmpliSeq workflow using one-half of the recommended reagent volumes were similar to the performance of libraries built with the recommended (full) volumes of the reagents.

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Momchilo Vuyisich ◽  
Ayesha Arefin ◽  
Karen Davenport ◽  
Shihai Feng ◽  
Cheryl Gleasner ◽  
...  

Sequencing bacterial genomes has traditionally required large amounts of genomic DNA (~1 μg). There have been few studies to determine the effects of the input DNA amount or library preparation method on the quality of sequencing data. Several new commercially available library preparation methods enable shotgun sequencing from as little as 1 ng of input DNA. In this study, we evaluated the NEBNext Ultra library preparation reagents for sequencing bacterial genomes. We have evaluated the utility of NEBNext Ultra for resequencing andde novoassembly of four bacterial genomes and compared its performance with the TruSeq library preparation kit. The NEBNext Ultra reagents enable high quality resequencing andde novoassembly of a variety of bacterial genomes when using 100 ng of input genomic DNA. For the two most challenging genomes (Burkholderiaspp.), which have the highest GC content and are the longest, we also show that the quality of both resequencing andde novoassembly is not decreased when only 10 ng of input genomic DNA is used.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Guo ◽  
Shilin Zhao ◽  
Quanhu Sheng ◽  
Mingsheng Guo ◽  
Brian Lehmann ◽  
...  

The most popular RNA library used for RNA sequencing is the poly(A) captured RNA library. This library captures RNA based on the presence of poly(A) tails at the 3′ end. Another type of RNA library for RNA sequencing is the total RNA library which differs from the poly(A) library by capture method and price. The total RNA library costs more and its capture of RNA is not dependent on the presence of poly(A) tails. In practice, only ribosomal RNAs and small RNAs are washed out in the total RNA library preparation. To evaluate the ability of detecting RNA for both RNA libraries we designed a study using RNA sequencing data of the same two breast cancer cell lines from both RNA libraries. We found that the RNA expression values captured by both RNA libraries were highly correlated. However, the number of RNAs captured was significantly higher for the total RNA library. Furthermore, we identify several subsets of protein coding RNAs that were not captured efficiently by the poly(A) library. One of the most noticeable is the histone-encode genes, which lack the poly(A) tail.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Yang ◽  
Chenkai Li ◽  
Ka Ming Nip ◽  
René L Warren ◽  
Inanc Birol

AbstractAs a widespread RNA processing machinery, alternative polyadenylation plays a crucial role in gene regulation. To help decipher its underlying mechanism and understand its impact, it is desirable to comprehensively profile 3’-untranslated region cleavage and associated polyadenylation sites. State-of-the-art polyadenylation site detection tools are known to be influenced by library preparation artefacts or manually selected features. Moreover, recently published machine learning methods have only been tested on pre-constructed datasets, thus lacking validation on experimental data. Here we present Terminitor, the first deep neural network-based profiling pipeline to make predictions from RNA-seq data. We show how Terminitor outperforms competing tools in sensitivity and precision on experimental transcriptome sequencing data, and demonstrate its use with data from short- and long-read sequencing technologies. For species without a good reference transcriptome annotation, Terminitor is still able to pass on the information learnt from a related species and make reasonable predictions. We used Terminitor to showcase how single nucleotide variations can create or destroy polyadenylated cleavage sites in human RNA-seq samples.Author Summary3’ cleavage and polyadenylation of pre-mRNA is part of RNA maturation process. One gene can be cleaved at different positions at its 3’ end, namely alternatively polyadenylation, thus identifying the correct polyadenylated cleavage site (poly(A) CS) is essential to unveil its role in gene regulation under different physiological and pathological conditions. The current poly(A) CS prediction tools are either heavily influenced by RNA-Seq library preparation artefacts or have only been designed and tested on ad hoc datasets, lacking association with real world applications. In this study, we present a deep learning model, Terminitor, that predicts the probability of a nucleotide sequence containing a poly(A) CS, and validated its performance on human and mouse data. Along with the model, we propose a poly(A) CS profiling pipeline for RNA-seq data. We benchmarked our pipeline against competing tools and achieved higher sensitivity and precision in experimental data. The usage of Terminitor is not limited to genome and transcriptome annotation and we expect it to facilitate the identification of novel isoforms, improve the accuracy of transcript quantification and differential expression analysis, and contribute to the repertoire of reference transcriptome annotation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aimeric Bruno ◽  
Jean-Marc Aury ◽  
Stefan Engelen

Abstract Background One of the main advantages of the Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) is the possibility of real-time sequencing. This gives access to information during the experiment and allows either to control the sequencing or to stop the sequencing once the results have been obtained. However, the ONT sequencing interface is not sufficient to explore the quality of sequencing data in depth and existing quality control tools do not take full advantage of real-time data streaming. Results Herein, we present BoardION, an interactive web application to analyze the efficiency of ONT sequencing runs. The interactive interface of BoardION allows users to easily explore sequencing metrics and optimize the quantity and the quality of the data generated during the experiment. It also enables the comparison of multiple flowcells to assess library preparation protocols or the quality of input samples. Conclusion BoardION is dedicated to people who manage ONT sequencing instruments and allows them to remotely and in real time monitor their experiments and compare multiple sequencing runs. Source code, a Docker image and a demo version are available at http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/boardion/.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric S. Tvedte ◽  
Jane Michalski ◽  
Shaoji Cheng ◽  
Rayanna S. Patkus ◽  
Luke J. Tallon ◽  
...  

AbstractLibrary preparation for high-throughput sequencing applications is a critical step in producing representative, unbiased sequencing data. The iGenomX Riptide High Throughput Rapid Library Prep Kit purports to provide high-quality sequencing data with lower costs compared to other Illumina library kits. To test these claims, we compared sequence data quality of Riptide libraries to libraries constructed with KAPA Hyper and NEBNext Ultra. Across several single-source genome samples, mapping performance and de novo assembly of Riptide libraries were similar to conventional libraries prepared with the same DNA. Poor performance of some libraries resulted in low sequencing depth. In particular, degraded DNA samples may be challenging to sequence with Riptide. There was little cross-well plate contamination with the overwhelming majority of reads belong to the proper source genomes. The sequencing of metagenome samples using different Riptide primer sets resulted in variable taxonomic assignment of reads. Increased adoption of the Riptide kit will decrease library preparation costs. However, this method might not be suitable for degraded DNA.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Owen ◽  
Mariya Moosajee

Abstract This protocol details the step-by-step procedures followed to process zebrafish retinal mRNA sequencing data generated by the SMARTSeq2 library preparation protocols in the manuscript Richardson et al 2019 1.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angel G. Rivera-Colón ◽  
Nicolas C. Rochette ◽  
Julian M. Catchen

AbstractRestriction-site Associated DNA sequencing (RADseq) has become a powerful and versatile tool in modern population genomics, enabling large-scale genomic analyses in otherwise inaccessible biological systems. With its widespread use, different variants on the protocol have been developed to suit specific experimental needs. Researchers face the challenge of choosing the optimal molecular and sequencing protocols for their experimental design, an often-complicated process. Strategic errors can lead to improper data generation that has reduced power to answer biological questions. Here we present RADinitio, simulation software for the selection and optimization of RADseq experiments via the generation of sequencing data that behaves similarly to empirical sources. RADinitio provides an evolutionary simulation of populations, implementation of various RADseq protocols with customizable parameters, and thorough assessment of missing data. Using the software, we test its efficacy using different RAD protocols across several organisms, highlighting the importance of protocol selection on the magnitude and quality of data acquired. Additionally, we test the effects of RAD library preparation and sequencing on allelic dropout, observing that library preparation and sequencing often contributes more to missing alleles than population-level variation.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Barlow ◽  
Gloria G. Fortes ◽  
Love Dalén ◽  
Ron Pinhasi ◽  
Boris Gasparyan ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe ability to access genomic information from ancient samples has provided many important biological insights. Generating such palaeogenomic data requires specialised methodologies, and a variety of procedures for all stages of sample preparation have been proposed. However, the specific effects and biases introduced by alternative laboratory procedures is insufficiently understood. Here, we investigate the effects of three DNA isolation and two library preparation protocols on palaeogenomic data obtained from four Pleistocene subfossil bones. We find that alternative methodologies can significantly and substantially affect total DNA yield, the mean length and length distribution of recovered fragments, nucleotide composition, and the total amount of usable data generated. Furthermore, we also detect significant interaction effects between these stages of sample preparation on many of these factors. Effects and biases introduced in the laboratory can be sufficient to confound estimates of DNA degradation, sample authenticity and genomic GC content, and likely also estimates of genetic diversity and population structure. Future palaeogenomic studies need to carefully consider the effects of laboratory procedures during both experimental design and data analysis, particularly when studies involve multiple datasets generated using a mixture of methodologies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document