Performance of the CoinShares Gold and Cryptoassets Index Under Different Market Regimes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aikaterini Koutsouri ◽  
Michael Petch ◽  
Will Knottenbelt
Keyword(s):  
Market Regimes

Catching-up and Leapfrogging in Key Manufacturing Sectors

2021 ◽  
pp. 136-155
Author(s):  
Keun Lee
Keyword(s):  
Mobile Phones ◽  
Explicit Knowledge ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Cycle Times ◽  
Catching Up ◽  
Manufacturing Sectors ◽  
Market Regimes ◽  
Catch Up ◽  
The Government ◽  
High Degree

Chapter 6 assesses China’s catching-up and leapfrogging in key manufacturing sectors compared with the Korean experience. It explains the varying records of market catch-up by referring to diverse aspects of technological and market regimes, such as modularity, degrees of embodied technical change, tacitness of knowledge, knowledge accessibility, and frequency of innovations. Easy access to foreign technologies from developed countries (mobile phones vs. semiconductors), high degree of modularity (mobile phones vs. automobiles and semiconductors), and frequent changes in the generations of technologies or short cycle times of technologies (mobile phones and telecommunications systems vs. automobiles) generally help latecomers catch up. More importantly, sectors with a high degree of tacit knowledge (e.g., automobiles) tend to show a slower speed of catch-up than the manufacturers of telecommunications equipment with a high degree of explicit knowledge. Whether markets feature segmentation (or the existence of low-end niche segments for Chinese latecomers) seems to play an important role in the market regimes. Chinese firms manage to achieve initial success from a low-end market in segmented market conditions (e.g., telecommunications equipment and mobile phones) or markets protected by the government (e.g., telecommunications equipment). Conversely, they face high entry barriers in markets with no such segmentation (e.g., memory chips), which is one of the reasons for their slow progress in the memory chip sector (see also Chapter 4). These cases also suggest that technological regimes are not the only paramount determining factor; the outcomes are affected by the roles of actors, including firms and governments.

scholarly journals US stock market regimes and oil price shocks

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 132-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timotheos Angelidis ◽  
Stavros Degiannakis ◽  
George Filis
Keyword(s):  
Stock Market ◽  
Oil Price ◽  
Oil Price Shocks ◽  
Price Shocks ◽  
Market Regimes

scholarly journals Model closure and price formation under switching grain market regimes in South Africa

Agrekon ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Meyer ◽  
P Westhoff ◽  
J Binfield ◽  
J F Kirsten
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Price Formation ◽  
Market Regimes ◽  
Grain Market

Capital Market Regimes and Bank Structure in Europe

2010 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 1073-1092 ◽  
Author(s):  
RONALD E. SHRIEVES ◽  
DREW DAHL ◽  
MICHAEL F. SPIVEY
Keyword(s):  
Capital Market ◽  
Bank Structure ◽  
Market Regimes
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document