scholarly journals Molecular Swarm Robot Realized by the Intelligence of a Biomolecular Motor System and DNA

2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 330-331
Author(s):  
Jakia Jannat KEYA ◽  
Akinori KUZUYA ◽  
Akira KAKUGO
Keyword(s):  
Motor System ◽  
Swarm Robot ◽  
Biomolecular Motor

scholarly journals DNA-assisted swarm control in a biomolecular motor system

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakia Jannat Keya ◽  
Ryuhei Suzuki ◽  
Arif Md. Rashedul Kabir ◽  
Daisuke Inoue ◽  
Hiroyuki Asanuma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor System ◽  
Biomolecular Motor

Integration of Soft Actuators Based on a Biomolecular Motor System to Develop Artificial Machines

2019 ◽  
pp. 691-709
Author(s):  
Jakia Jannat Keya ◽  
Kentaro Kayano ◽  
Arif Md. Rashedul Kabir ◽  
Akira Kakugo
Keyword(s):  
Motor System ◽  
Soft Actuators ◽  
Biomolecular Motor

Does the Motor System Facilitate Spatial Imagery?

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 127-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Krüger ◽  
Horst Krist
Keyword(s):  
Motor System ◽  
Third Graders ◽  
External Support ◽  
New Paradigm ◽  
Perceptual Condition ◽  
Imagery Condition ◽  
Passive Rotation ◽  
Perception Condition ◽  
Motor Condition ◽  
Dynamic Imagery

Abstract. Recent studies have ascertained a link between the motor system and imagery in children. A motor effect on imagery is demonstrated by the influence of stimuli-related movement constraints (i. e., constraints defined by the musculoskeletal system) on mental rotation, or by interference effects due to participants’ own body movements or body postures. This link is usually seen as qualitatively different or stronger in children as opposed to adults. In the present research, we put this interpretation to further scrutiny using a new paradigm: In a motor condition we asked our participants (kindergartners and third-graders) to manually rotate a circular board with a covered picture on it. This condition was compared with a perceptual condition where the board was rotated by an experimenter. Additionally, in a pure imagery condition, children were instructed to merely imagine the rotation of the board. The children’s task was to mark the presumed end position of a salient detail of the respective picture. The children’s performance was clearly the worst in the pure imagery condition. However, contrary to what embodiment theories would suggest, there was no difference in participants’ performance between the active rotation (i. e., motor) and the passive rotation (i. e., perception) condition. Control experiments revealed that this was also the case when, in the perception condition, gaze shifting was controlled for and when the board was rotated mechanically rather than by the experimenter. Our findings indicate that young children depend heavily on external support when imagining physical events. Furthermore, they indicate that motor-assisted imagery is not generally superior to perceptually driven dynamic imagery.

Higher-order representations of newly learnt action sounds in the human motor system

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Waszak ◽  
S. Schuetz-Bosbach ◽  
C. Weiss ◽  
L. Ticini
Keyword(s):  
Motor System ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Human Motor

EEG Investigation of Motor System Activity During Language Comprehension

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Carranza ◽  
Matthew Bachman ◽  
Michael P. Kaschak ◽  
Edward M. Bernat ◽  
John L. Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Language Comprehension ◽  
Motor System ◽  
System Activity

An Inverter-Driven Induction Motor System with a Deadlock Breaking Capability

2012 ◽  
Vol 132 (8) ◽  
pp. 802-807
Author(s):  
Takuto Ichikawa ◽  
Toshiya Yoshida ◽  
Osamu Miyashita
Keyword(s):  
Induction Motor ◽  
Motor System

Observing painful events in others leads to a temporally extended general response facilitation in the self

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl Michael Orquiola Galang
Keyword(s):  
Motor System ◽  
Response Times ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Painful Stimulus ◽  
Facilitation Effect ◽  
Motor Responses ◽  
Response Facilitation ◽  
Task Instructions ◽  
General Response ◽  
Muscle Specificity

Excitability in the motor cortex is modulated when we observe other people receiving a painful stimulus (Avenanti et al., 2005). However, the task dependency of this modulation is not well understood, as different paradigms have yielded seemingly different results. Previous neurophysiological work employing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) suggests that watching another person’s hand being pierced by a needle leads to a muscle specific inhibition, assessed via motor evoked potentials. Results from previous behavioural studies suggest that overt behavioural responses are facilitated due to pain observation (Morrison et al., 2007a; 2007b). There are several paradigmatic differences both between typical TMS studies and behavioural studies, and within behavioural studies themselves, that limit our overall understanding of how pain observation affects the motor system. In the current study, we combine elements of typical TMS experimental designs in a behavioural assessment of how pain observation affects overt behavioural responding. Specifically, we examined the muscle specificity, timing, and direction of modulation of motor responses due to pain observation. To assess muscle specificity, we employed pain and non-pain videos from previous TMS studies in a Go/No-Go task in which participants responded by either pressing a key with their index finger or with their foot. To assess timing, we examined response times for Go signals presented at 0ms or 500ms after the video. Results indicate that observation of another individual receiving a painful stimulus leads to a non-effector specific, temporally extended response facilitation (e.g., finger and foot facilitation present at 0ms and 500ms delays), compared to observation of non-pain videos. This behavioural facilitation effect differs from the typical motor inhibition seen in TMS studies, and we argue that the effects of pain observation on the motor system are state-dependent, with different states induced via task instructions. We discuss our results in light of previous work on motor responses to pain observation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document