scholarly journals Social Value Orientation as a Moral Intuition: Decision-Making in the Dictator Game

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gert Cornelissen ◽  
Siegfried Dewitte ◽  
Luk Warlop
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Dictator Game ◽  
Value Orientation ◽  
Moral Intuition ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation

Theories and Measurement Methods of Social Value Orientation Related to Decision Making

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen ZHANG ◽  
Fan ZHANG ◽  
Liang HUANG ◽  
Bo YUAN ◽  
Yiwen WANG
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Value Orientation ◽  
Measurement Methods ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation

scholarly journals Social Value Orientation Modulates Fairness Processing During Social Decision-Making: Evidence From Behavior and Brain Potentials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinmu Hu ◽  
Xiaoqin Mai
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Ultimatum Game ◽  
Value Orientation ◽  
Emotional Reactions ◽  
Event Related Potential ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation ◽  
Social Decision ◽  
Frontal Negativity ◽  
Social Decision Making

Abstract Social value orientation (SVO) characterizes stable individual differences by an inherent sense of fairness in outcome allocations. Using the event-related potential (ERP), this study investigated differences in fairness decision-making behavior and neural bases between individuals with prosocial and proself orientations using the Ultimatum Game (UG). Behavioral results indicated that prosocials were more prone to rejecting unfair offers with stronger negative emotional reactions compared with proselfs. ERP results revealed that prosocials showed a larger P2 when receiving fair offers than unfair ones in a very early processing stage, whereas such effect was absent in proselfs. In later processing stages, although both groups were sensitive to fairness as reflected by an enhanced medial frontal negativity (MFN) for unfair offers and a larger P3 for fair offers, prosocials exhibited a stronger fairness effect on these ERP components relative to proselfs. Furthermore, the fairness effect on the MFN mediated the SVO effect on rejecting unfair offers. Findings regarding emotional experiences, behavioral patterns, and ERPs provide compelling evidence that SVO modulates fairness processing in social decision-making, whereas differences in neural responses to unfair vs. fair offers as evidenced by the MFN appear to play important roles in the SVO effect on behavioral responses to unfairness.

Injustice for All or Just for Me? Social Value Orientation Predicts Responses to Own Versus Other’s Procedures

2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 1247-1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Willem van Prooijen ◽  
Tomas Ståhl ◽  
Daniel Eek ◽  
Paul A. M. van Lange
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Value Orientation ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Social Value Orientation

In two experiments, the authors investigated how differences in social value orientation predict evaluations of procedures that were accorded to self and others. Proselfs versus prosocials were either granted or denied an opportunity to voice an opinion in a decision-making process and witnessed how someone else was either granted or denied such an opportunity. Consistent with the hypothesis, procedural evaluations of both proselfs and prosocials were influenced by own procedure when other was granted voice, but only proselfs were influenced by own procedure when other was denied voice. These findings were particularly attributable to prosocials’ tendency to evaluate a situation where no-voice procedures are applied consistently between persons more positively than proselfs. It is concluded that proselfs are focused on procedural justice and injustice for self more than prosocials, whereas prosocials value equality in procedures more than proselfs—even when equality implies injustice for all.

scholarly journals The egocentric nature of procedural justice: Social value orientation as moderator of reactions to decision-making procedures

2008 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 1303-1315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Willem van Prooijen ◽  
David De Cremer ◽  
Ilja van Beest ◽  
Tomas Ståhl ◽  
Marius van Dijke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Value Orientation ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation

scholarly journals A Game Mechanism of Individual Value Decision-Making Based on SVO Differences

Complexity ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Xu Shi ◽  
Lu-yun Qiu ◽  
Zhi-geng Fang ◽  
Xia-qing Liu ◽  
Yang-yang Du
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Intrinsic Value ◽  
Value Orientation ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation ◽  
Value System ◽  
The Social ◽  
Prosocial Orientation ◽  
Individual Value

As the externalized carrier of intrinsic value, value decision-making is an important factor affecting the social value system. As an old Chinese saying goes, “A friend in need is a friend indeed,” crisis environment provides the background for the conflicts of multiple values, while individual social value orientation (SVO) determines the ranking of the value states. This paper defined the SVO types by means of Slider Measure method on the basis of environment description, constructed a decision-making game model in accordance with SVO differences, and finally analysed the mechanism of people’s decision-making. Taking the epidemic situation as the background, this paper conducted an empirical analysis with the sample of college students. The results showed that the most SVO types of college students were prosocial orientation, followed by individualistic orientation, altruistic orientation, and competitive orientation. In the crisis environment, individual SVO type and decision-making constituted a mapping relationship. There was an equilibrium point in the decision of prosocial orientation, and the dominant decision of altruistic orientation or individualistic orientation is relatively stable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document