Out of Options? Optimal Incentives and Industry Dynamics

Author(s):  
Antonio Falato ◽  
Dalida Kadyrzhanova
2009 ◽  
pp. 132-143
Author(s):  
K. Sonin ◽  
I. Khovanskaya

Hiring decisions are typically made by committees members of which have different capacity to estimate the quality of candidates. Organizational structure and voting rules in the committees determine the incentives and strategies of applicants; thus, construction of a modern university requires a political structure that provides committee members and applicants with optimal incentives. The existing political-economic model of informative voting typically lacks any degree of variance in the organizational structure, while political-economic models of organization typically assume a parsimonious information structure. In this paper, we propose a simple framework to analyze trade-offs in optimal subdivision of universities into departments and subdepartments, and allocation of political power.


1992 ◽  
Vol 1992 (4) ◽  
pp. 108-113
Author(s):  
Wilson H. Taylor

1996 ◽  
Vol 1996 (6) ◽  
pp. 59-71
Author(s):  
Christopher P. Dixon
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Enrico Böhme ◽  
Jonas Severin Frank ◽  
Wolfgang Kerber

AbstractIn this paper, we show that a provision in antitrust law to allow patent settlements with a later market entry of generics than the date that is expected under patent litigation can increase consumer welfare. We introduce a policy parameter for determining the optimal additional period for collusion that would incentivize the challenging of weak patents and maximize consumer welfare. While in principle, later market entry leads to higher profits and lower consumer welfare, this can be more than compensated for if more patents are challenged as a result.


2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime Gomez ◽  
Gianvito Lanzolla ◽  
Juan Pablo Maicas

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew B. Bernard ◽  
J. Bradford Bradford Jensen ◽  
Peter K. Schott

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document