scholarly journals Consumption Commitments and Employment Contracts

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Postlewaite ◽  
Larry Samuelson ◽  
Dan Silverman
Keyword(s):  
Employment Contracts ◽  
Consumption Commitments

Consumption Commitments and Employment Contracts, Second Version

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Postlewaite ◽  
Larry Samuelson ◽  
Dan Silverman
Keyword(s):  
Employment Contracts ◽  
Consumption Commitments

scholarly journals Consumption Commitments and Employment Contracts

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Postlewaite ◽  
Larry Samuelson ◽  
Dan Silverman
Keyword(s):  
Employment Contracts ◽  
Consumption Commitments

scholarly journals Consumption Commitments and Employment Contracts

2008 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 559-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANDREW POSTLEWAITE ◽  
LARRY SAMUELSON ◽  
DAN SILVERMAN
Keyword(s):  
Employment Contracts ◽  
Consumption Commitments

Atypical Forms of Employment Contracts in Times of Crisis

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carole Lang ◽  
Isabelle Schhmann ◽  
Stefan Clauwaert
Keyword(s):  
Employment Contracts

Employment contracts

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (4) ◽  
pp. 14-15
Author(s):  
Rachel Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Employment Contracts

The Inviolability of Diplomatic Agents in the Context of Employment

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Rodgers
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Fair Trial ◽  
European Convention ◽  
Employment Contracts ◽  
Domestic Servants ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Diplomatic Immunity ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Way

‘Ordinary’ employment contracts—including those of domestic servants—have been deemed to attract diplomatic immunity because they fall within the scope of diplomatic functions. This chapter highlights the potential for conflict between these forms of immunity and the rights of the employees, and reflects on cases in which personal servants of diplomatic agents have challenged both the existence of immunity and the scope of its application. The chapter examines claims that the exercise of diplomatic immunity might violate the right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the way in which courts have dealt with these issues. The chapter analyses diplomats’ own employment claims and notes that they are usually blocked by the assertion of immunity, but also reflects on more recent developments in which claims had been considered which were incidental to diplomatic employment (eg Nigeria v Ogbonna [2012]).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document