scholarly journals Institutional Investors and Equity Returns: Are Short-term Institutions Better Informed?

Author(s):  
Zhe Zhang ◽  
Xuemin Sterling Yan
2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pawel Bilinski ◽  
Douglas J. Cumming ◽  
Lars Helge Hass ◽  
Konstantinos Stathopoulos ◽  
Martin Walker

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Fichtner

During the last decades, institutional investors gained an ever more important position as managers of assets and owners of corporations. By demanding (short-term) shareholder value, some of them have driven the financialization of corporations and of the financial sector itself. This chapter first characterizes the specific roles that private equity funds, hedge funds, and mutual funds have played in this development. It then moves on to focus on one group of institutional investors that is rapidly becoming a pivotal factor for corporate control in many countries – the “Big Three” large passive asset managers BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street.


2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (10) ◽  
pp. 3185-3223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Schulz

I present novel empirical evidence on the term structure of the equity risk premium. In contrast to previous research that documented high discount rates for the short-term component of the market portfolio, I show evidence for an unconditionally flat term structure of equity risk premia. The tension with previous literature arises largely as a result of differential treatments of heterogeneous investment taxes, manifested in micro evidence on abnormal equity returns on ex-dividend days, and liquidity. The results not only help resolve an important recent “puzzle” but provide further important insights on the role of investment taxes in asset pricing. (JEL G11, G12, G35)


Author(s):  
Shamsul Naharabdullah ◽  
Mohd Azlan Yahya ◽  
Faisol Elham

This study attempts to investigate the extent to which the financial characteristics of firms are related to institutional shareholdings. The primary motivation to carry out the study comes from an earlier paper by Hessel and Norman (1992), which showed that seven financial ratios discriminated between strongly-held and institutionally-neglected firms. As an extension of the study, the present study seeks to investigate the seven financial ratios among Malaysian companies by identifying differences in the means of the seven ratios between a group of companies with substantial institutional shareholdings against another group of companies with negligible institutional shareholdings. The findings, from a sample of KLSE listed companies, broadly support the findings by Hessel and Norman (1992), in which firms with significant institutional shareholdings exhibited a significantly higher profitability ratio against firms that were neglected by institutional investors.. This suggested that institutional investors placed greater emphasis on a firm's short-term results. Our evidence also did not indicate institutional shareholders' direct involvement in ensuring a firm's long-term growth and competitiveness, as shown by the insignificant differences in the mean of growth ratio between firms that had significant institutional shareholdings and those that were neglected by institutional investors.  


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 146-156
Author(s):  
Peterson Owusu Junior ◽  
Imhotep Alagidede ◽  
George Tweneboah

We explore interdependence and contagion in the top 9 emerging markets and the US equities using a novel time-varying GLD-based Baruník & Křehlík (2018) (BK18) spillover technique. The GLD accounts for the extreme returns while the BK18 capture the nonlinear, nonstationary, asymmetric, and time-dependent comovements in higher moments. We find dominance of some emerging markets instead of the US in the frequency-dependent spillovers. We also establish shape shift-contagion in emerging markets equities in the short-term. Our results shed new light on the sources of connectedness and contagion through the shape parameters of equity returns.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document