Organizational Risk Taking: Learning versus Variable Risk Preferences

Author(s):  
Jerker Denrell
2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu Li ◽  
Yongqing Fang

AbstractTriggered by rather surprising findings that respondents in Asian cultures (e.g., Chinese) are more risk-seeking and more overconfident than respondents in other cultures (e.g., in United States) and that the reciprocal predictions are in total opposition, four experiments were designed to extend previous collective-culture oriented researches. Results revealed that (1) Singapore 21, which is a vision of Singapore in the 21st century and has highlighted the promotion of a collective culture, did not advocate greater risk-seeking but led to weaker overconfidence; (2) the knowledge of "financial help from social network" did not permit prediction of risk preference but the knowledge of "the value difference between possible outcomes" did; (3) the social network could be viewed not only as a positive "cushion" but also as a negative "burden" in both gain and loss domains of risky choices; (4) the predictions of the risk-as-value, risk-as-feelings and stereotype hypotheses were not consistent with the predicted risk preferences of others but the predictions of the economic-performance hypothesis were consistent with the predicted risk preferences as well as the predicted overconfidence of others. The implications for cross-cultural variations in overconfidence and for cross-cultural variations in risk-taking were discussed.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (1) ◽  
pp. 17341
Author(s):  
Christina Fang ◽  
Torben Juul Andersen ◽  
Richard A Bettis ◽  
Philip Bromiley ◽  
Daniel Feiler ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 17-29
Author(s):  
M. Keith Wright ◽  
Utpal Bose ◽  
Shohreh Hashemi ◽  
Diana Pence

This article presents and experimentally tests a new method for measuring student risk preferences where monetary outcomes are not directly involved. The authors call this new method the Lazy Professor Risk Task (LPRT). This article compares the LPRT's results to popular conventional methods where monetary outcomes are involved. The results show that the new method is capable of producing consistent responses at approximately the same rate as comparable conventional methods. In addition, the method produced responses that were no noisier than conventional methods. It is hoped that future research can perfect this new method and use it to compare classroom risk taking to risk taking in other domains.


2020 ◽  
pp. 0419-10183R1
Author(s):  
Deborah A. Cobb-Clark ◽  
Sarah C. Dahmann ◽  
Nathan Kettlewell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document