Creating a National State Rainy Day Fund: A Modest Proposal to Improve Future State Fiscal Performance

Author(s):  
Rick Mattoon
2021 ◽  
pp. 293-318
Author(s):  
Vasyl Ilnytskyi ◽  
Mykola Hlibischuk ◽  
Oleksii Kompaniiets

Summary. The purpose of the article is to analyze the peasant issues in the ideological-theoretical and epistolary heritage of Peter Fedun-"Poltava". Research methodology – the principles of science, objectivity, historicism, methods of external and internal criticism of sources. The scientific novelty – P. Fedun’s vision concerning the solution of the peasant question in the future Ukrainian state is studied for the first time. Conclusions. Having analyzed the works of Petro Fedun-"Poltava", we claim that all of them are marked by the depth and breadth of the issues raised, some have not even lost their relevance to this day. The style of writing, the clear presentation of opinions, the processing of various literature (including foreign language) indicate to the author’s high intellectual level. Developments required an immediate response to them, therefore much attention was paid to refining the program principles and their popularization as well as refuting the myths created by the Soviet propaganda machine. In his works P. Fedun-"Poltava" wrote about the development of the future Ukrainian state, refinement of the program principles of the OUN, the problem of various social strata, justified its position on the confrontation among the Ukrainian political emigration and more. When considering the problems of different social strata, the question of the peasantry was among the central ones in the works of Peter Fedun. The researcher substantiated the OUN’s position on the peasantry, in particular: forms of land ownership and tools, collectivization (methods and forms of involvement in collective farms, the consequences for the peasantry and resistance to this policy), elections etc. "Poltava" considered the peasantry to be the foundation of the whole nation, emphasizing its contribution to the assimilation and denationalization policy of the occupiers, sacrifice, loyalty to national traditions, the presence of healthy morals and spirit. According to P. Fedun, the economic basis of this society was to be public, national-state or social-cooperative ownership of tools and means of production in all major sectors of the economy, as well as planning and social control of all economic life. P. Fedun saw the solution of the land issue in the formation of national-state ownership of land in the future Ukrainian state, in parallel with individual or collective use of land. At the same time, in the future state, a parliamentary form of government should be established in the future state.


2001 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter E. Nathan
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 149-155
Author(s):  
Alexey B. Panchenko

Yu. F. Samarin’s works are traditionally viewed through the prism of his affiliation with Slavophilism. His view of the state is opposed to the idea of the complex empire based on unequal interaction of the central power with the elite of national districts. At the same time it was important for Samarin to see the nation not as an ethnocultural community, but as classless community of equal citizens, who were in identical position in the face of the emperor. Samarin’s attitude to religion and nationality had pragmatic character and were understood as means for the creation of the uniform communicative space inside the state. This position for the most part conformed with the framework of the national state basic model, however there still existed one fundamental difference. Samarin considered not an individual, but the rural community that owned the land, to be the basic unit of the national state. As the result the model of national state was viewed as the synthesis of modernistic (classlessness, pragmatism, equality) and archaic (communality) features.


CFA Magazine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-7
Author(s):  
Ed McCarthy
Keyword(s):  

1970 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 14-18
Author(s):  
Tilford C. Gaines
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (11) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Harith Qahtan Abdullah ◽  
Abbas Fadel Atwan

The borders of Kurdistan represent an important point in Kurdish thought. They represent the hope of establishing their national state. The circumstances of the war on terrorism in Iraq and Syria have led to the emergence of what is known as a "propaganda" and the formation of a global front in its struggle. And with the signs of the collapse of the Syrian state and the weakness of the Iraqi state in the face of the "dashing" in the beginning. These circumstances led to the emergence of the role of the Kurdistan region in the confrontation "ISIS" and maintain the administrative border in the three provinces of Kurdistan in addition to the province of Kirkuk. That the circumstances of the war on terrorism created new international conditions on the Middle East arena, which will generate many problems between the Kurdistan region and the central government of Baghdad, as well as other problems between the region, Syria, Turkey and Iran. The war on terrorism has made countries free to fight the opposition groups under the name Terrorism by their classification. The Turkish side is fighting the PKK within the borders of the Kurdistan region, and this war can develop in a post-"warlike" phase. The war in Syria is also contradictory to vision and not resolved to a specific side and Iran's position on developments is encouraging.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document