scholarly journals Property Rights, Mobile Capital, and Comparative Advantage

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry S. Karp
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Comparative Advantage ◽  
Mobile Capital

scholarly journals PENGARUH PERKEMBANGAN IPTEK TERHADAP PERMASALAHAN HAKI

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (Edsus) ◽  
Author(s):  
Munsharif Abdul Chalim
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Genetic Engineering ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Comparative Advantage ◽  
Economic Benefit ◽  
Technology Development ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Rights Issues

Intellectual Property Rights’ issues are growing problems in accordance with the development of science and technology. As examples of developments in biotechnology with the technology of genetic engineering led to the birth of the need to protect the results of biotechnology engineering. In developed countries Intellectual Property Rights has become part of everyday society, so that science and technology development in the country are always oriented to the protection of Intellectual Property Rights. Excellence in aspects of trade can be owned by developed countries because one of them is determined by the comparative advantage of the ability of science and technology that is related to the field of intellectual property rights.  Keywords: IPRs, law protection, economic benefit

The Role of the Local State in China's Transitional Economy

1995 ◽  
Vol 144 ◽  
pp. 1132-1149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean C. Oi
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Market Economy ◽  
Comparative Advantage ◽  
East Asian ◽  
Transitional Economy ◽  
Newly Industrializing Countries ◽  
Developmental States ◽  
Secure Environment ◽  
Laissez Faire

All states have a role in development, but this varies widely. The spectrum is defined at one end by the laissez faire minimalist state whose role is limited to ensuring a stable and secure environment so that contracts, property rights and other institutions of the market can be honoured. At the opposite end are the centrally planned Leninist states that directly replace the market with bureaucratic allocation and planning. Between these two extremes are the capitalist developmental states of Japan and the East Asian Newly Industrializing Countries (NICs) that are neither Communist nor laissez faire, but exhibit characteristics of both. The state plays an activist, rather than a minimalist, role; there is planning, but it is geared toward creating maximum competitive and comparative advantage for manufacturers within a market economy.

The Evolution of Private Property in Nineteenth-Century Hawaii

1990 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 829-852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumner J. La Croix ◽  
James Roumasset
Keyword(s):  
Nineteenth Century ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Comparative Advantage ◽  
Private Property ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Population Pressure ◽  
Private Land ◽  
Sugar Production ◽  
Tax Revenues ◽  
Market Opportunities

Population pressure has been identified as a major force behind the transition from traditional property rights in land to exclusive, transferable property rights. This article examines the case of Hawaii where the transition to private property in land occurred while its population was rapidly declining. That transition was driven by new market opportunities and considerations of public finance.The shift in comparative advantage to sugar production increased the rents associated with private land rights, while declining tax revenues prompted the king and his government to pursue property rights reform to gain additional revenues.

The State, Civilization, and Extreme Inequality

2021 ◽  
pp. 133-186
Author(s):  
Jon D. Wisman
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Comparative Advantage ◽  
Western Europe ◽  
Social Hierarchy ◽  
The State ◽  
Social Agency ◽  
Military Organization ◽  
Organizational Skills

Agriculture set the preconditions for metallurgy and sophisticated military organization, facilitating the rise of the state and civilization about 5,500 years ago. Whereas earlier stone weapons, available to all, served to preclude the formation of elites and inequality, expensive metal weapons, superior organizational skills, and ideology enabled elites to subjugate all others and extract their surplus, leaving the latter with bare subsistence. This elite formed the state, that social agency with a comparative advantage in violence. Social hierarchy became hereditary and increasingly rigid, and inequality became extreme. Elites gained highly disproportionate sexual access to women, often enclosed in harems. Understandably, rulers would strive to appease potential internal usurpers by protecting their property rights and ability to extract surplus from their subordinates. Until the rise of capitalism and a bourgeoisie in Western Europe, this appeasement of potential usurpers and elites generally precluded robust and sustainable economic dynamism.

The Origins and Consequences of Property Rights

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Harris ◽  
Meina Cai ◽  
Ilia Murtazashvili ◽  
Jennifer Murtazashvili
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document