Hypomethylating Agents as Maintenance Therapy in the Treatment of Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia:A Meta-Analysis

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhihua Wu ◽  
Pei Zhu ◽  
Hao Yan ◽  
Tiansheng Zeng ◽  
Lin Fu
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Smith Kungwankiattichai ◽  
◽  
Ben Ponvilawa ◽  
Claudie Roy ◽  
Pattaraporn Tunsing ◽  
...  

Review question / Objective: P: Patients with AML or MDS after allo-SCT; I: Hypomethylating agents after allo-SCT; C: Observation after allo-SCT; O: Overall survival rates. Condition being studied: Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) seem to have a range of properties favorable to post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) maintenance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. This meta-analysis was performed to review all relevant studies to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing allo-SCT for AML or MDS receiving HMA maintenance therapy with observation only. Information sources: The systematic search of the Embase and MEDLINE databases identified 4,416 articles, from which 512 duplicates were removed. This resulted in 3,904 articles available for title and abstract review. Subsequently, 3,875 articles were excluded as the article type and study design did not fulfill the inclusion criteria, or there was no report on a primary outcome of interest. The remaining 29 articles underwent full-length review and 18 of those were excluded for the aforementioned reasons. Ultimately, the eligibility criteria for our meta-analysis were met by 11 studies: 2 RCTs, 1 prospective cohort study, and 8 retrospective cohort studies.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2327-2327
Author(s):  
Imran Nizamuddin ◽  
Timothy Seijung Oh ◽  
Yazan Numan ◽  
Max Farber Kelsten ◽  
Madelyn Burkart ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has evolved tremendously. Recently, venetoclax with hypomethylating agents (HMA/ven) demonstrated durable responses in the frontline and relapsed/refractory (R/R) settings. This regimen is now standard of care for older adults or those unfit for intensive induction chemotherapy (DiNardo CD, N Engl J Med, 2020). Our institution also often uses HMA/ven to treat fit patients (pts) with high risk disease characteristics. Because HMA/ven was studied in transplant-ineligible pts, outcomes following potentially curative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remain unknown. This retrospective study aims to describe characteristics and outcomes of pts treated with HMA/ven who proceeded to HSCT. Methods Adult pts diagnosed with AML and treated with HMA/ven either in the frontline or R/R setting between 1/2010 and 2/2020 at the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University were identified. Hypomethylating agents included either azacitadine or decitabine. Data were collected and analyzed based on demographics, laboratory and clinical characteristics, and disease and toxicity outcomes. Efficacy endpoints included complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), and CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp). Survival curves for overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analyses were performed to determine impact of clinical variables on outcomes (significance defined as p≤0.05). Cohorts were compared using χ 2 or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the unpaired t-test for continuous variables. Results Clinical and demographic features at time of diagnosis are listed in Table 1. In total, 257 pts received HMA/ven. Of these, 36 pts received a HSCT, which was the population analyzed in this study. In the front-line setting 11 (31%) pts received HMA/ven and 25 (69%) pts received HMA/ven for R/R disease. 25 (69%) pts received azacitadine and 11 (31%) pts received decitabine (5 days, n=5, 14%; 10 days, n=6, 17%). Based on ELN guidelines, 23 (64%) pts had adverse risk disease at diagnosis. Response to HMA/ven in the pre-transplant setting is shown in Table 2. Of 35 evaluable pts, 34 achieved remission (CR, n=32, 91%; CRi, n=1, 3%; CRp, n=1, 3%). Table 3 shows outcomes following HSCT. 14 (39%) pts relapsed post HSCT and 13 (36%) pts received treatment for relapse. With a median follow-up of 11.6 months, median LFS from time of transplantation was 11.2 months. Median OS was not reached over follow up period but estimated to be 25.4 months. There was a significant difference in rates of relapse based on ELN classification at diagnosis (p=0.0296). In comparison, presence of complex/monosomal karyotypes (p=0.593), blast percentage at diagnosis (p=0.456), donor type (p=0.484), and number of previous lines of therapy (p=0.822) did not predict for relapse. Median LFS in adverse and favorable/intermediate risk ELN groups was 5.8 and 19.8 months, respectively. Median OS in adverse and favorable/intermediate risk ELN groups was 25.4 and 29.5 months, respectively. Following transplant, 10 (28%) pts received maintenance therapy with a median of 5 cycles (range 1-14); 8 pts (22%) received HMA/ven maintenance following HSCT. There was no significant difference in relapse rates between those who received maintenance therapy (n=6, 43%) and those who did not (n=8, 57%) (p = 0.107). Median time to relapse from HSCT was 4.42 months in those who received maintenance therapy compared to 2.98 months in those who did not receive maintenance therapy (p=0.370). Following relapse, 10 (28%) pts were retreated with HMA/ven, but less than half (n=4, 40%) had a response. To date, 22 (61%) pts are alive with the majority (n=19, 86%) in remission. 14 (39%) pts died with half in remission at the time of death. Conclusions Our study showed that HMA/ven can feasibly be used not only to bridge to transplant, but to achieve durable remissions post HSCT. For those pts that relapsed post HSCT, duration of remission was very short. ELN classification was the only factor that informed relapse risk. Prospective studies must be done to understand which cytogenetic and molecular subgroups benefit the most from HMA/ven prior to transplant. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Abaza: BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Altman: Biosight: Consultancy, Other: Travel fees, Research Funding; Fujifilm: Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Kartos: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; ALZ Oncology: Research Funding; Theradex: Consultancy, Other: Advisory boards; Syros: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Aprea: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; GlycoMimetics: Other: Participation on an advisory board; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Kura Oncology: Consultancy. Dinner: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nico Gagelmann ◽  
Christine Wolschke ◽  
Evgeny Klyuchnikov ◽  
Maximilian Christopeit ◽  
Francis Ayuk ◽  
...  

This analysis aimed to systematically review and synthesize the existing evidence regarding the outcome of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) maintenance therapy after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation for patients with FLT3-ITD-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We searched publicly available databases, references lists of relevant reviews, registered trials, and relevant conference proceedings. A total of 7 studies comprising 680 patients were included. Five studies evaluated sorafenib and 2 studies evaluated midostaurin, compared with control. The incidence of relapse was significantly reduced after TKI therapy, showing an overall pooled risk ratio (RR) of 0.35 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.51; P < 0.001), with a marked 65% reduced risk for relapse. The overall pooled RR for relapse-free survival and overall survival showed significantly improved outcome after TKI maintenance therapy, being 0.48 (95% CI, 0.37–0.61; P < 0.001) and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.36–0.64; P < 0.001). The risk for relapse or death from any cause was reduced by 52% using TKI. No difference in outcome was seen for non-relapse mortality, and the risk for chronic or acute graft-vs. -host disease appeared to be increased, at least for sorafenib. In conclusion, post-transplant maintenance therapy with TKI was associated with significantly improved outcome in relapse and survival in patients with FLT3-ITD positive AML.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick K. Reville ◽  
Tapan M. Kadia

Recent advances in therapeutics coupled with steady improvements in supportive care for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have led to improved outcomes. Despite these advances, even in patients that achieve a complete remission with initial therapy high rates of relapse remain a clinical dilemma. For decades, investigators have attempted strategies of maintenance therapy to prolong both remission duration and overall survival in patients with AML. These approaches have included cytotoxic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, hypomethylating agents, and targeted small molecule therapy. Overall, the evidence in favor of maintenance therapy is limited. Recent strategies, especially with hypomethylating agents have begun to show promise as maintenance therapy in improving clinical outcomes. Ongoing and future studies will continue to elucidate the true role for maintenance therapy options in patients with AML. In this review we summarize prior and ongoing maintenance therapy approaches in AML and highlight some of the most promising strategies.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 34-35
Author(s):  
Jan Philipp Bewersdorf ◽  
Martin S. Tallman ◽  
Christina Cho ◽  
Amer M. Zeidan ◽  
Maximilian Stahl

Background: Prognosis of patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) is extremely poor and strategies to reduce the risk of disease relapse are warranted. Hypomethylating agents (HMA) or FLT3 inhibitors have been used in several studies for relapse prevention following allo-HCT with mixed results leaving the question regarding the safety and efficacy of this strategy unanswered. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis and searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and CENTRAL from inception to 8/2020 for studies using the following combination of free-text terms linked by Boolean operators: [Acute myeloid leukemia OR AML OR MDS OR Myelodysplastic syndrome] AND [transplant OR allogeneic stem cell transplant OR hematopoietic stem cell transplantation] AND [maintenance OR maintenance therapy OR maintenance treatment]. Titles and abstracts were reviewed and excluded if they were review or basic research articles, not on post-allo-HCT maintenance in AML or MDS, no English full-text was available, or if they were clinical trials without published results. Full-texts were reviewed and excluded if (I) duplicate publications from the same patient cohort, (II) insufficient reporting of endpoints, (III) studies not on FLT3 inhibitors or HMA, (IV) case series with <5 pts, or (V) commentaries without original independent data. Studies using FLT3 inhibitors or HMA for pre-emptive treatment of imminent relapse based on positive minimal residual disease (MRD) testing were excluded. Outcomes of interest were the rates of 2-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) as well as incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020187298). Results: The search strategy retrieved 1388 unique citations (Figure 1). After application of additional exclusion criteria, 22 studies were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 829 pts was included with 462 and 367 receiving post-allo-HCT treatment with FLT3 inhibitors or HMA, respectively. All pts treated with FLT3 inhibitors had AML, while 231 AML and 112 MDS pts were treated with HMA, respectively. Among studies on FLT3 inhibitors, sorafenib was used in 10 studies with midostaurin and quizartinib being used in 1 study each. Azacitidine was used in 8 studies, decitabine in 3 studies and 1 study used both azacitidine and decitabine. Patient, transplant, and treatment characteristics of the included studies are shown in Table 1. Reporting of outcomes was variable among the included studies (Figure 2;Panels A-D). Among pts treated with FLT3 inhibitors, 2-year OS and RFS rates were 81.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 70.0 - 89.5%), and 82.9% (95% CI: 76.9 - 87.5%), respectively. Acute and chronic GVHD occurred in 10.4% (95% CI: 0.5 - 73.3%) and 38.4% (95% CI: 13.4 - 71.5%) of pts, respectively. In HMA-treated pts, 2-year OS and RFS rates were 65.6% (95% CI: 54.7 - 75.1%) and 56.2% (42.4 - 69.2%), respectively. Acute and chronic GVHD occurred in 39.9% (95% CI: 29.2 - 51.6%) and 44.4% (95% CI: 34.1 - 55.2%) of pts, respectively. Study quality was limited by retrospective design employed by 10 studies, small sample sizes in some of the analyses, and heterogenous patient populations, reporting of outcomes, and transplant characteristics which were limiting cross-study comparisons. Discussion: Maintenance therapy with FLT3 inhibitors or HMA following allo-HCT in AML and MDS pts appears to be safe and can potentially be associated with prolonged RFS and OS although its efficacy needs to be verified in randomized trials. Careful patient selection is necessary as both the rates of GVHD and the burden on pts related to extended treatment following allo-HCT can be substantial. Selecting pts based on high-risk genetic (e.g. presence of TP53 mutations) and other disease characteristics (MRD-positivity at time of allo-HCT) could be options for patient selection but require additional validation. Various clinical trials investigating the role of post allo-HCT maintenance therapy are ongoing and our data could serve as a reference when interpreting the results of those trials. Disclosures Tallman: Daiichi-Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Orsenix: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bioline rx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioSight: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rafael: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; Delta Fly Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncolyze: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KAHR: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zeidan:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CCITLA: Other; Astex: Research Funding; Trovagene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Aprea: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Cardiff Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Ionis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acceleron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Cardinal Health: Consultancy, Honoraria; Taiho: Consultancy, Honoraria; BeyondSpring: Consultancy, Honoraria; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene / BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; MedImmune/Astrazeneca: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document