From Census Tracts to Metropolitan Areas. Measuring Multiscale Residential Segregation of Immigrant Population. Barcelona and Madrid (2008-2018)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan Carles Martori ◽  
Rafa Madariaga
Keyword(s):  
Residential Segregation ◽  
Metropolitan Areas ◽  
Immigrant Population ◽  
Census Tracts

Change in Elderly Residential Segregation in Canadian Metropolitan Areas, 1981–91

1998 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey C. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Residential Segregation ◽  
Census Data ◽  
Metropolitan Areas ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Census Tracts ◽  
Suburban Areas ◽  
Population Distributions ◽  
Age Segregation ◽  
Elderly Living

ABSTRACTUsing census data, this study investigates change in the residential segregation of persons age 65 years and over from younger persons in Canadian census metropolitan areas (CMAs) between 1981 and 1991. In each CMA, age-segregation is first evaluated in terms of inner city-suburban population distributions, and then according to the degree of segregation across census tracts expressed by the Index of Dissimilarity. Although the CMAs typically had moderate segregation levels in both 1981 and 1991, there were consistent trends toward (i) increasing proportions of the elderly living in suburban areas, and (ii) declining degrees of age-segregation across census tracts. It is proposed that these trends are partly attributable to the aging in place of suburban residents. Correlation and regression analyses indicate that in 1991 lower degrees of segregation were associated with CMAs which had relatively high percentages of both older dwellings and elderly population. The policy implications of the results are discussed.

Residential Segregation and Ethnic Enterprise in U.S. Metropolitan Areas

2000 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 408-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary J. Fischer ◽  
Douglas S. Massey
Keyword(s):  
Residential Segregation ◽  
Metropolitan Areas

Residential Patterns among Religious Groups in Canadian Cities

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 393-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Fong ◽  
Elic Chan
Keyword(s):  
Residential Segregation ◽  
Religious Identity ◽  
Census Data ◽  
Metropolitan Areas ◽  
Community Services ◽  
Religious Community ◽  
Canadian Society ◽  
Religious Groups ◽  
Residential Patterns ◽  
Comprehensive Comparison

This study, based on 2001 Canadian census data for 16 census metropolitan areas, explores residential segregation among eight religious groups. We include non–Christian religious groups to reflect the emerging religious diversity of Canadian society. Our study provides the first comprehensive comparison of the residential patterns of people affiliated with major religious groups in Canada. We argue that each religion is associated with unique sets of religious institutional behaviors, which in turn shape each religious group's relationships with other religious groups. In this study, we identify four religious institutional behaviors that can affect the residential segregation of various religious groups: institutional orientation of religious community services, subcultural identity, religious identity, and discrimination. The findings indicate that these religious institutional behaviors are related to the residential segregation patterns of different religious groups.

Activity locations, residential segregation and the significance of residential neighbourhood boundary perceptions

Urban Studies ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 004209802096626
Author(s):  
Nicolo P Pinchak ◽  
Christopher R Browning ◽  
Catherine A Calder ◽  
Bethany Boettner
Keyword(s):  
Residential Segregation ◽  
Activity Patterns ◽  
Social Processes ◽  
Routine Activity ◽  
Urban Residents ◽  
Census Tracts ◽  
Activity Spaces ◽  
Measurement Strategies ◽  
Urban Activity ◽  
Residential Neighbourhood

The inadequacies of residential census geography in capturing urban residents’ routine exposures have motivated efforts to more directly measure residents’ activity spaces. In turn, insights regarding urban activity patterns have been used to motivate alternative residential neighbourhood measurement strategies incorporating dimensions of activity space in the form of egocentric neighbourhoods – measurement approaches that place individuals at the centre of their own residential neighbourhood units. Unexamined, however, is the extent to which the boundaries of residents’ own self-defined residential neighbourhoods compare with census-based and egocentric neighbourhood measurement approaches in aligning with residents’ routine activity locations. We first assess this question, examining whether the boundaries of residents’ self-defined residential neighbourhoods are in closer proximity to the coordinates of a range of activity location types than are the boundaries of their census and egocentric residential neighbourhood measurement approaches. We find little evidence that egocentric or, crucially, self-defined residential neighbourhoods better align with activity locations, suggesting a division in residents’ activity locations and conceptions of their residential neighbourhoods. We then examine opposing hypotheses about how self-defined residential neighbourhoods and census tracts compare in socioeconomic and racial composition. Overall, our findings suggest that residents bound less segregated neighbourhoods than those produced by census geography, but self-defined residential neighbourhoods still reflect a preference towards homophily when considering areas beyond the immediate environment of their residence. These findings underscore the significance of individuals’ conceptions of residential neighbourhoods to understanding and measuring urban social processes such as residential segregation and social disorganisation.

Change in Racial and Ethnic Residential Inequality in American Cities, 1970–2000

2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 335-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey M. Timberlake ◽  
John Iceland
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Residential Segregation ◽  
Time Horizon ◽  
Metropolitan Areas ◽  
Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Spatial Assimilation ◽  
Location Patterns ◽  
Ethnic Residential Segregation ◽  
Residential Inequality ◽  
American Cities

We complement and extend research on change in racial and ethnic residential segregation by estimating determinants of change from 1970 to 2000 in four measures of residential inequality—dissimilarity, entropy, isolation, and net difference—between American Whites, Blacks, Asians, and Latinos. Because we use a longer time horizon and multiple measures, our findings clearly demonstrate some convergence in residential location patterns across groups, indicating gradual spatial assimilation in U.S. metropolitan areas. Although Blacks continue to be more segregated than either Asians or Latinos, residential inequality has declined more rapidly for Blacks than for the other two groups, particularly in terms of neighborhood socioeconomic status. We also find that all three groups, but particularly Asians, have been converting income gains relative to Whites into improved neighborhood socioeconomic status more than into increased residential integration with Whites.

The Dimensions of Racial Inequality: Occupational and Residential Segregation Across Metropolitan Areas in the United States

2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 313-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth Ovadia
Keyword(s):  
Residential Segregation ◽  
Racial Inequality ◽  
Census Data ◽  
Metropolitan Areas ◽  
The United States ◽  
Zero Order ◽  
Structural Systems ◽  
Exogenous Factor ◽  
Empirical Examination ◽  
American Society

Residential and occupational segregation are two structural systems that perpetuate the disadvantaged status of blacks in American society. Despite extensive research on both these topics, there has been little empirical examination as to whether they are independent systems or both part of a larger monolithic system of racial inequality. An analysis of 1990 Census data for 261 metropolitan areas shows that there is a negative zero‐order correlation between the two forms of segregation. However, controlling for the size of the population accounts for the negative correlation. Net of this exogenous factor, the correlation between the two forms of segregation is not statistically significant. This suggests that for individuals, the issue of racial inequality is one of tradeoffs between forms of disadvantage as one moves from city to city. For policymakers, these results indicate that urban racial inequality is multidimensional, requiring different strategies for different manifestations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document