Breastfeeding Skills Training for Health Care Professionals: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Mulcahy ◽  
Llyod F. Philpott ◽  
Michelle O’Driscoll ◽  
Róisín Bradley ◽  
Patricia Leahy-Warren
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Skills Training

Improving Communication Skills in Health Care

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 109-117
Author(s):  
Lynda Katz Wilner ◽  
Marjorie Feinstein-Whittaker
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Communication Skills ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Skills Training ◽  
International Medical Graduate ◽  
Medical Graduate ◽  
Health Care Environment ◽  
Medical Interpreters ◽  
Accent Modification

Hospital reimbursements are linked to patient satisfaction surveys, which are directly related to interpersonal communication between provider and patient. In today’s health care environment, interactions are challenged by diversity — Limited English proficient (LEP) patients, medical interpreters, International Medical Graduate (IMG) physicians, nurses, and support staff. Accent modification training for health care professionals can improve patient satisfaction and reduce adverse events. Surveys were conducted with medical interpreters and trainers of medical interpreting programs to determine the existence and support for communication skills training, particularly accent modification, for interpreters and non-native English speaking medical professionals. Results of preliminary surveys suggest the need for these comprehensive services. 60.8% believed a heavy accent, poor diction, or a different dialect contributed to medical errors or miscommunication by a moderate to significant degree. Communication programs should also include cultural competency training to optimize patient care outcomes. Examples of strategies for training are included.

scholarly journals Current Evidence for Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring by Wearable Wireless Devices in Hospitalized Adults: Systematic Review

10.2196/18636 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. e18636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jobbe P L Leenen ◽  
Crista Leerentveld ◽  
Joris D van Dijk ◽  
Henderik L van Westreenen ◽  
Lisette Schoonhoven ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Continuous Monitoring ◽  
Vital Signs ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Wireless Devices

Background Continuous monitoring of vital signs by using wearable wireless devices may allow for timely detection of clinical deterioration in patients in general wards in comparison to detection by standard intermittent vital signs measurements. A large number of studies on many different wearable devices have been reported in recent years, but a systematic review is not yet available to date. Objective The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review for health care professionals regarding the current evidence about the validation, feasibility, clinical outcomes, and costs of wearable wireless devices for continuous monitoring of vital signs. Methods A systematic and comprehensive search was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 2009 to September 2019 for studies that evaluated wearable wireless devices for continuous monitoring of vital signs in adults. Outcomes were structured by validation, feasibility, clinical outcomes, and costs. Risk of bias was determined by using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2nd edition, or quality of health economic studies tool. Results In this review, 27 studies evaluating 13 different wearable wireless devices were included. These studies predominantly evaluated the validation or the feasibility outcomes of these devices. Only a few studies reported the clinical outcomes with these devices and they did not report a significantly better clinical outcome than the standard tools used for measuring vital signs. Cost outcomes were not reported in any study. The quality of the included studies was predominantly rated as low or moderate. Conclusions Wearable wireless continuous monitoring devices are mostly still in the clinical validation and feasibility testing phases. To date, there are no high quality large well-controlled studies of wearable wireless devices available that show a significant clinical benefit or cost-effectiveness. Such studies are needed to help health care professionals and administrators in their decision making regarding implementation of these devices on a large scale in clinical practice or in-home monitoring.

scholarly journals Mindfulness, Compassion, and Self-Compassion Among Health Care Professionals: What's New? A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ciro Conversano ◽  
Rebecca Ciacchini ◽  
Graziella Orrù ◽  
Mariagrazia Di Giuseppe ◽  
Angelo Gemignani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Self Compassion

scholarly journals Health care professionals' attitudes towards deprescribing in older patients with limited life expectancy: A systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. 868-892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina Lundby ◽  
Trine Graabæk ◽  
Jesper Ryg ◽  
Jens Søndergaard ◽  
Anton Pottegård ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Life Expectancy ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Limited Life Expectancy ◽  
Limited Life

scholarly journals Implicit Racial/Ethnic Bias Among Health Care Professionals and Its Influence on Health Care Outcomes: A Systematic Review

2015 ◽  
Vol 105 (12) ◽  
pp. 2588-2588 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Hall ◽  
Mimi V. Chapman ◽  
Kent M. Lee ◽  
Yesenia M. Merino ◽  
Tainayah W. Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Ethnic Bias ◽  
Health Care Outcomes ◽  
Care Outcomes ◽  
Racial Ethnic

scholarly journals PNS42 Health Care Professionals and Mobile Applications: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S88
Author(s):  
V. Chandran ◽  
A. Nair ◽  
G. Thunga ◽  
G. Pai ◽  
S. Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Mobile Applications

scholarly journals A Systematic Review of Usability Challenges and Testing in Mobile Health

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tareq Ali Al-Saadi ◽  
Tamer Mohammed Aljarrah ◽  
Anahed Mudheher Alhashemi ◽  
Azham Hussain
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Mobile Health ◽  
Mobile Communications ◽  
Digital Libraries ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Usability Testing ◽  
Smart Phones ◽  
Portable Devices ◽  
The Impact

Nowadays, the combining of advanced mobile communications and mobile account now in portable devices named "smart phones" has becomes more great uses. Among of these include health care professionals. Few studies in the challenge, blurred reality challenge facing the patient and developer alike in the usability of mobile health. Therefore, this paper aims to analyze the usability challenges in mobile health and usability testing. The systematic review was using for collecting the prior studies that relation with our study. This study concentrates on the three digital libraries Google scholar, ACM and IEEE, as well as, the researcher selected the studies between 2007 and 2015. The results from this systematic were selected 11 studies of 106 based on the inclusions criteria. In more details, the usability challenges found that 27% offered User Interface, 22% tasks and screen size, 16% insert media and 13% network. On the other hand, usability use found that, 46% of the selected studies the usability use of formal type of 45% informal and 9% mixed formal and informal. Sum up, the use of smart phones is getting more on health care and day out. Medical applications make smart phones useful tools in the practice of evidence-based medicine at the point of care, in addition to its use in mobile clinical communications. This study will making a contribution to the researchers to extract over the impact of the challenges on usability testing and the types of usability in mobile health.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document