C-Suite Incentive Conflict and Firm Efficiency

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kienpin Tee ◽  
Feng Han ◽  
Ghulame Rubbaniy
Keyword(s):  
Firm Efficiency ◽  
Incentive Conflict

scholarly journals Investigation on firm efficiency: evidence from selected Asia-Pacific countries

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 3062-3080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khar Mang Tan ◽  
Fakarudin Kamarudin ◽  
Amin Noordin Bany-Ariffin ◽  
Norhuda Abdul Rahim
Keyword(s):  
Technical Efficiency ◽  
Small Firms ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Profit Maximization ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Scale Efficiency ◽  
Scale Level ◽  
Firm Efficiency ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Parametric Data

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the firm efficiency or technical efficiency (TE), pure technical efficiency (PTE) and scale efficiency (SE) in the selected developed and developing Asia-Pacific countries. Design/methodology/approach The sample consists of a sum of 700 firms in selected developed and developing Asia-Pacific countries over the period from 2009 to 2015. The non-parametric data envelopment analysis under the production approach is used to investigate firm efficiency. Findings On average, this paper discovers that the firms in selected Asia-Pacific countries are moderately efficient. Scale inefficiency (SIE) is found to be the dominant source of firms’ technical inefficiency. The analysis of return to scale shows that the large firms tend to operate at decreasing return to scale level, while the small firms tend to operate at increasing return to scale level. Practical implications The findings from this paper provide significant insights to the policy makers and firm managers in promoting the efficient firms of Asia-Pacific countries. Originality/value The present paper conducts a critical analysis on return to scale in the firms sector of Asia-Pacific context, which is ignored by the past studies on firm efficiency since the analysis of return to scale is mostly emphasized on banking sector. The precise nature of SIE is important for a firm to be efficient in achieving the firm’s primary goals of profit maximization and sustaining market competitiveness.

scholarly journals Does relative (absolute) efficiency affect capital costs?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dafydd Mali ◽  
Hyoung-Joo Lim
Keyword(s):  
Significant Relationship ◽  
Relative Efficiency ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
Operational Performance ◽  
Firm Efficiency ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Capital Costs ◽  
Absolute Efficiency ◽  
Accounting Ratios

AbstractIn this paper, we examine the effect of relative/absolute firm efficiency on weighted average cost of capital (WACC). Using a sample of Korean listed firms, we find that WACC is negatively associated with relative firm efficiency (operational performance) suggesting that firms with higher (lower) relatively efficiency are expected to pay lower (higher) capital costs. When we repeat our analysis using absolute firm efficiency (ROA), we do not find a statistically significant relationship. Our results suggest relative efficiency which is estimated as output (sales) divided by the resources that are directly under the control of management is assessed by capital providers and impounded into a firm’s capital costs. Absolute efficiency (ROA) which is estimated as sales divided by total assets is not. Our results suggest that simple accounting ratios used in the accounting literature are not considered as informative to explain borrowing costs compared to relative efficiency that captures managerial operational performance.

EXPRESS: Despite Efficiencies, M&As Reduce Firm Value by Hurting Customer Satisfaction

2021 ◽  
pp. 002224292110242
Author(s):  
Nita Umashankar ◽  
S. Cem Bahadir ◽  
Sundar Bharadwaj
Keyword(s):  
Customer Satisfaction ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Dark Side ◽  
Executive Attention ◽  
Firm Efficiency ◽  
Upper Echelons Theory ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Customer Dissatisfaction ◽  
Investor Returns

Most researchers focus on the effect of mergers and acquisitions (M&As) on investor returns and overlook customer reactions, despite the fact that customers are directly impacted by these corporate transformations. Others suggest that in M&A contexts, a dual emphasis of customer satisfaction and firm efficiency is both likely and beneficial. In contrast, the authors demonstrate that M&As not only do not yield a dual emphasis but also cause a decline in customer satisfaction to the extent that it eclipses any gain in firm value from an increase in firm efficiency. A quasi-experimental difference-in-differences analysis and an instrumental variable panel regression provide robust evidence for the dark side of M&As for customers. The authors use the attention-based view of the firm to demonstrate that post-M&A customer dissatisfaction occurs because of a shift in executive attention away from customers and toward financial issues. In line with the related upper echelons theory, they find that marketing representation on firms’ board of directors helps maintain executive attention on customers, which mitigates the dysfunctional effect of M&As on customer satisfaction. This research identifies a negative M&A-customer satisfaction relationship and highlights executive attention to customer issues and marketing leadership as factors that mitigate this negative relationship.

Firm Characteristics, Relative Efficiency, and Equity Returns

2009 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 213-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giao X. Nguyen ◽  
Peggy E. Swanson
Keyword(s):  
Explanatory Power ◽  
Stochastic Frontier ◽  
Efficiency Score ◽  
Equity Returns ◽  
Firm Characteristics ◽  
Stochastic Frontier Approach ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Firm Efficiency ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Sectional Analysis

AbstractThis study uses a stochastic frontier approach to evaluate firm efficiency. The resulting efficiency score, based on firm characteristics, is the input for performance evaluation. The portfolio composed of highly efficient firms significantly underperforms the portfolio composed of inefficient firms even after adjustment for firm characteristics and risk factors, suggesting a required premium for the inefficient firms. The difference in performance between the two portfolios remains for at least five years after the portfolio formation year. In addition, firm efficiency exhibits significant explanatory power for average equity returns in cross-sectional analysis.

scholarly journals Ownership Structure Variation and Firm Efficiency

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sallahuddin Hassan ◽  
Zalila Othman ◽  
Mukaramah Harun
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Structure Variation ◽  
Firm Efficiency
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document