Rawls and Progressive Democracy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Reidy
Keyword(s):  
Progressive Democracy

scholarly journals Managing Democracy in Malaysia (Identity, Minorities, and Representation)

ARISTO ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 185
Author(s):  
Arik Dwijayanto ◽  
Yusmicha Ulya Afif ◽  
Khoirul Fathoni
Keyword(s):  
Central Government ◽  
Gain Control ◽  
Racial Groups ◽  
Simple Majority ◽  
Muslim Country ◽  
Government Service ◽  
Global Trend ◽  
Standing Up ◽  
Progressive Democracy ◽  
First Time

The Malaysian General Election (GE-14) in May 2018 raised an interesting and new phenomenon. For the first time since independence of Malaysia in 1957, the rulling alliance known as the National Front (Barisan Nasional, BN) which led by UMNO failed to secure simple majority in parliament and lost control of seven of Malaysia’s 13 states. This was due to the challenge presented by the new opposition alliance known as Pakatan Harapan (Alliance of Hope, PH) which won 113 of seats in parliament and gain control the central government. It is interesting that this significant increase in support for the opposition is due to their change the way minorities, identity and representation is managed. The Malaysian Supremacy as political manifesto of Pakatan Harapan which involves eradicating affirmative action based on etnicity, basing it instead on need, for instance need due to prosperity through the removal of government service tax (GST), and reformation of law. This would potentially increase the justice and equality for all ethnic or racial groups. This paper links the 2013 and 2018 elections, the more global trend in which minorities and youth representation  are standing up to demand their right and to the challenge multiracial presents in Malaysia as a Muslim country. Therefore, the fundamental questions in this paper of how Pakatan Harapan manage minorities, identity and representation within in the process of democracy and to what extent the opportunities and the involvement of youth as voters and parliamentary candidates in order to support a progressive democracy in Malaysia.

Radical, Reformist and Aborted Liberalism: Origins of National Regimes in Central America

2001 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAMES MAHONEY
Keyword(s):  
Twentieth Century ◽  
Costa Rica ◽  
El Salvador ◽  
Central America ◽  
Political Development ◽  
Central American ◽  
Political Leaders ◽  
Reform Period ◽  
Liberal Reform ◽  
Progressive Democracy

During the twentieth century, the countries of Central America were characterised by remarkably different political regimes: military-authoritarianism in Guatemala and El Salvador, progressive democracy in Costa Rica and traditional-authoritarianism in Honduras and Nicaragua. This article explains these contrasting regime outcomes by exploring the agrarian and state-building reforms pursued by political leaders during the nineteenth- and early twentieth-century liberal reform period. Based on differences in the transformation of state and class structures, three types of liberalism are identified: radical liberalism in Guatemala and El Salvador, reformist liberalism in Costa Rica and aborted liberalism in Honduras and Nicaragua. It is argued that these types of liberalism set the Central American countries on contrasting paths of political development, culminating in diverse regime outcomes.

scholarly journals The Limits of Deliberation About the Public's Values

2021 ◽  
pp. 1111
Author(s):  
Mark Seidenfeld
Keyword(s):  
Progressive Democracy

A Review of The Public's Law: Origins and Architecture of Progressive Democracy by Blake Emerson.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document