Fair or Unbiased Algorithmic Decision-Making? A Review of the Literature on Digital Economics

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grazia Cecere ◽  
Nicoletta Corrocher ◽  
Clara Jean
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Digital Economics

scholarly journals Role of dashboards in improving decision making in healthcare: Review of the literature

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleeha Iftikhar ◽  
Raymond Bond ◽  
Victoria McGilligan ◽  
Stephen J Leslie ◽  
Khaled Rjoob ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Review Of The Literature

scholarly journals The PICO strategy for the research question construction and evidence search

2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 508-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Mamédio da Costa Santos ◽  
Cibele Andrucioli de Mattos Pimenta ◽  
Moacyr Roberto Cuce Nobre
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Review Of The Literature

Evidence based practice is the use of the best scientific evidence to support the clinical decision making. The identification of the best evidence requires the construction of an appropriate research question and review of the literature. This article describes the use of the PICO strategy for the construction of the research question and bibliographical search.

Perception of Romanian Consumers on Ecological Products

2016 ◽  
pp. 203-224
Author(s):  
Violeta Sima ◽  
Ileana Georgiana Gheorghe
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Organic Food ◽  
Food Products ◽  
Purchase Decision ◽  
Main Concern ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Consumption Behavior ◽  
Perceptions And Attitudes ◽  
Organic Products ◽  
Decision Making System

This chapter aimed to investigate perceptions and attitudes of Romanian consumers about organic products, in order to study the connection between knowledge and attitudes of consumers and their place in purchase decision-making system to understand their behavior toward organic food. In the first part, after a brief introduction, the authors tried to perform a review of the literature in the field, starting from the presentation of the concept of green or ecological consumption behavior and the notions related to it. A synthetic scheme of the drivers of the green market was proposed as a conclusion of this introductory part. The main concern is about consumption of the ecological products in Romania. The authors identified a number of 17 relevant studies performed in Romania in order to help them substantiate their work. They took into account two issues, namely, Ecological Non-Food Products and Ecological Food Products.

Article Commentary: Surgical Management of the Axilla in Breast Cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 475-486
Author(s):  
Stephanie Mastrangelo ◽  
Kelly McMasters ◽  
Nicolas Ajkay
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Axillary Dissection ◽  
Lymph Node Biopsy ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Node Biopsy ◽  
Clinically Node Positive

This article offers a review of the literature on current surgical management of the axilla in breast cancer. This includes the decision-making process involved in clinically node-negative patients versus clinically node-positive patients, with discussion of the indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary dissection. It also examines the surgical axillary management of patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This article will help update practicing surgeons on the evolving research and guidelines for the management of breast cancer axillary disease.

scholarly journals P140: Emergency department decision-making for incapacitated and unrepresented patients: a comprehensive review of the literature

CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. S124-S125
Author(s):  
J.L. Willinsky ◽  
I. Hyun
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Medical Decision Making ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Ethics Committees ◽  
Medical Decision ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Comprehensive Review ◽  
Patient Cohort ◽  
Decision Making Processes

Introduction: Incapacitated patients who lack substitute decision-makers (SDM) are commonly encountered in the emergency department (ED). The number of these patients will rise dramatically as the Baby Boomers age. We can expect an influx of elderly patients who lack decisional capacity due to dementia and other illnesses, and who present without family. It is estimated that 3 to 4 percent of U.S. nursing home residents have no SDM or advance directives. Medical decision-making for this cohort poses an ethical challenge, particularly in the ED setting. Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted surrounding decision-making for incapacitated and unrepresented patients in the hospital setting. Articles were identified using MEDLINE (1946-October 2015) and Embase (1974-October 2015). The reference lists of relevant articles were hand searched. Articles describing decision-making processes that have been proposed, tested or applied in practice were chosen for full review. The aim of this review was to outline recognized medical decision-making processes for incapacitated and unrepresented patients, and to identify areas for future research. Results: The search yielded 20 articles addressing decision-making for incapacitated and unrepresented patients in the hospital setting. All of these articles focus on the intensive care unit and other hospital wards; no literature on the ED setting was found. Five types of formal consulting bodies exist to assist physicians in applying the best interest standard for this patient cohort: internal hospital ethics committees, external ethics committees, public guardians, court-appointed guardians, or judges. The majority of decisions for these patients, however, are made informally by a single physician or by a healthcare team, although it is well recognized that this approach lacks appropriate safeguards. There is no consensus surrounding the optimal approach to decision-making in these cases, and as such there is significant inconsistency in how medical decisions are made for these patients. Conclusion: There are several articles describing decision-making processes for incapacitated and unrepresented patients, none of which focus on the ED. These processes are not practical for use in the ED. Further inquiry is needed into the most ethical and respectful method of decision-making for this patient cohort in the ED.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document