scholarly journals A Neuronal Code for Space in Hippocampal Coactivity Dynamics Independent of Place Fields

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliott R.J. Levy ◽  
Eun Hye Park ◽  
William T. Redman ◽  
André A. Fenton
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliott R J Levy ◽  
Eun Hye Park ◽  
William T Redman ◽  
André A Fenton

Hippocampus CA1 place cells express a spatial neural code by discharging action potentials in cell-specific locations (′place fields′), but their discharge timing is also coordinated by multiple mechanisms, suggesting an alternative ′ensemble cofiring′ neural code, potentially distinct from place fields. We compare the importance of these distinct information representation schemes for encoding environments. Using miniature microscopes, we recorded the ensemble activity of mouse CA1 principal neurons expressing GCaMP6f across a multi-week experience of two distinct environments. We find that both place fields and ensemble coactivity relationships are similarly reliable within environments and distinctive between environments. Decoding the environment from cell-pair coactivity relationships is effective and improves after removing cell-specific place tuning. Ensemble decoding relies most crucially on anti-coactive cell pairs distributed across CA1 and is independent of place cell firing fields. We conclude that ensemble cofiring relationships constitute an advantageous neural code for environmental space, independent of place fields.


1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J. Knierim ◽  
Hemant S. Kudrimoti ◽  
Bruce L. McNaughton
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebi V. Rolotti ◽  
Mohsin Ahmed ◽  
Miklos Szoboszlay ◽  
Tristan Geiller ◽  
Adrian Negran ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 597-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsuneyuki Kobayashi ◽  
Hisao Nishijo ◽  
Masaji Fukuda ◽  
Jan Bures ◽  
Taketoshi Ono

Kobayashi, Tsuneyuki, Hisao Nishijo, Masaji Fukuda, Jan Bures, and Taketoshi Ono. Task-dependent representations in rat hippocampal place neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 597–613, 1997. It is suggested that the hippocampal formation is essential to spatial representations by flexible encoding of diverse information during navigation, which includes not only externally generated sensory information such as visual and auditory sensation but also ideothetic information concerning locomotion (i.e., internally generated information such as proprioceptive and vestibular sensation) as well as information concerning reward. In the present study, we investigated how various types of information are represented in the hippocampal formation, by recording hippocampal complex-spike cells from rats that performed three types of place learning tasks in a circular open field with the use of intracranial self-stimulation as reward. The intracranial self-stimulation reward was delivered in the following three contexts: if the rat 1) entered an experimenter-determined reward place within the open field, and this place was randomly varied in sequential trials; 2) entered two specific places, one within and one outside the place field (an area identified by change in activity of a place neuron); or 3) entered an experimenter-specified place outside the place field. Because the behavioral trails during navigation were more constant in the second task than in the first task, ideothetic information concerning locomotion was more relevant to acquiring reward in the second task than in the first task. Of 43 complex-spike cells recorded, 37 displayed place fields under the first task. Of these 37 place neurons, 34 also had significant reward correlates only inside the place field. Although reward and place correlates of the place neuron activity did not change between the first and second tasks, neuronal correlates to behavioral variables for locomotion such as movement speed, direction, and turning angle significantly increased in the second task. Furthermore, 6 of 31 place neurons tested with the third task, in which the reward place was located outside the original place field, shifted place fields. The results indicated that neuronal correlates of most place neurons flexibly increased their sensitivity to relevant information in a given context and environment, and some place neurons changed the place field per se with place reward association. These results suggest two strategies for how hippocampal neurons incorporate an incredible variety of perceptions into a unified representation of the environment: through flexible use of information and the creation of new representations.


2001 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J. Knierim ◽  
Bruce L. McNaughton

“Place” cells of the rat hippocampus are coupled to “head direction” cells of the thalamus and limbic cortex. Head direction cells are sensitive to head direction in the horizontal plane only, which leads to the question of whether place cells similarly encode locations in the horizontal plane only, ignoring the z axis, or whether they encode locations in three dimensions. This question was addressed by recording from ensembles of CA1 pyramidal cells while rats traversed a rectangular track that could be tilted and rotated to different three-dimensional orientations. Cells were analyzed to determine whether their firing was bound to the external, three-dimensional cues of the environment, to the two-dimensional rectangular surface, or to some combination of these cues. Tilting the track 45° generally provoked a partial remapping of the rectangular surface in that some cells maintained their place fields, whereas other cells either gained new place fields, lost existing fields, or changed their firing locations arbitrarily. When the tilted track was rotated relative to the distal landmarks, most place fields remapped, but a number of cells maintained the same place field relative to the x-y coordinate frame of the laboratory, ignoring the z axis. No more cells were bound to the local reference frame of the recording apparatus than would be predicted by chance. The partial remapping demonstrated that the place cell system was sensitive to the three-dimensional manipulations of the recording apparatus. Nonetheless the results were not consistent with an explicit three-dimensional tuning of individual hippocampal neurons nor were they consistent with a model in which different sets of cells are tightly coupled to different sets of environmental cues. The results are most consistent with the statement that hippocampal neurons can change their “tuning functions” in arbitrary ways when features of the sensory input or behavioral context are altered. Understanding the rules that govern the remapping phenomenon holds promise for deciphering the neural circuitry underlying hippocampal function.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document